For this head-to-head article, I analyzed 23 Swann cameras and 22 Lorex cameras to give you some key insights on a good cross-section of their camera offerings. A full list of the product codes is included at the end of the article.

The Winners

Best for Home Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Advanced Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Home Security: Swann

I’ve decided on Swann as the best for home security. 

They have a wider range of battery-powered and Wi-Fi cameras, which are more suited to small home security installations. Most of their cameras have a cloud storage option and they offer 24/7 professional monitoring with Swann Secure+. Lorex does not offer either of these services. 

Swann also has a wide range of cameras with active deterrence tech (flashing blue and red lights based on movement) which can help deter intruders.

Best for Advanced Security: Lorex

For households with larger security budgets or businesses looking for a more comprehensive surveillance solution, then I definitely recommend Lorex over Swann. Lorex has a much wider range of wired cameras (PoE in particular) and also offers a much better range of PTZ cameras.

Their kit is generally heavier duty and all features come out of the box. So no need to subscribe to a monthly payment plan, like Swann.

Lorex vs Swann: Overview

Swann and Lorex cater to different customer bases, with Swann providing a mix of business and consumer products, while Lorex leans more toward business solutions. In terms of user reviews, Swann enjoys a higher mobile app rating (4.6/5) compared to Lorex (3.6/5) (as of the time of writing).

Swann has a cloud solution called Secure+ Plans, which offers cloud storage, smart/AI notifications, extended warranty, and rich app previews for a monthly subscription fee ranging from $2.99 – $9.99. Unfortunately, some of the features on some devices are limited unless you subscribe (e.g. rich app previews, video analytics, motion zones). Lorex, on the other hand, no longer has a cloud offering.

Regarding interoperability, both brands support protocols like RTSP, but Swann promotes it while Lorex doesn't advertise its support for ONVIF and RTSP. Additionally, Swann equipment is manufactured by HikVision, while Lorex equipment is manufactured by Dahua and is now owned by Skywatch, a Taiwanese company.

In terms of disadvantages, Swann faces complaints about hardware quality, whereas Lorex has no professional monitoring option. Key benefits for Swann include flexible recording options and premium tech support, while Lorex is known for its specialization in security cameras and systems, no monthly fees, financing options, and a good reputation among DIYers and installers.

Camera Types

Swann offers a greater variety of camera types, from fully wired, to Wi-Fi and fully battery-powered. Lorex, on the other hand, lends more toward fully wired cameras which is better suited for commercial installations.

For those who are cost-conscious, Swann and Lorex both offer budget, mid-range, and high-end camera models. Swann's price range generally starts from $29.95 and goes up to $249.99, while Lorex's price range begins at $39.99 and goes up to $1,199.99. The wide price range for both brands allows you to choose a camera based on your budget.

Regarding cloud subscriptions, Swann cameras have optional monthly contracts for some models, allowing you to decide if you want to save your footage on the cloud or not. On the other hand, Lorex cameras do not have cloud subscription options.

In comparing warranties, most Swann cameras come with a standard 1-year warranty, while some of their mid-range models have a 3-year warranty. Subscribing to Swann Secure+ can also extend the warranty. Lorex, on the other hand, offers 1-year warranties on all models.

Video

Swann offers a comprehensive range of security camera options, with many models supporting motion-activated recording. Motion-activated recording is a feature that allows the camera to start recording only when movement has been detected, which can save storage space and extend the life of the camera. Most Swann models also support continuous recording, ensuring that you never miss a moment of action.

One notable feature of Swann's security cameras is Privacy Masking, available for some models, such as the SWNHD-1200BE. Privacy Masking is a technique used to block out specific areas within the camera's field of view, ensuring more sensitive areas are not recorded, maintaining privacy while still providing security coverage.

On the other hand, Lorex security cameras come with a variety of advanced features to enhance their performance. For instance, many models support a higher maximum supported frame rate compared to Swann models. A high frame rate allows for smoother video playback and better image quality, which is crucial when it comes to identifying subjects or reviewing footage.

Lorex cameras are also equipped with advanced video coding formats, such as H.265 and H.264, which enable efficient video compression without sacrificing image quality. This is essential for saving storage space and reducing the necessary bandwidth for video streaming.

In addition, Lorex cameras come with various advanced video features, such as 3D Digital Noise Reduction (3D DNR), White Balance Control, and Gain Control. These features provide clearer images by reducing noise, maintaining accurate color representation, and adjusting brightness levels.

Some Lorex models, like the LNE9383 and LNZ81P25, include Digital Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) or High Dynamic Range (HDR) technology. This technology is essential for capturing clear images in challenging lighting conditions, such as backlight or high-contrast scenes.

Power & Data Feeds

Swann offers a variety of models with different power options, such as Power over Ethernet (PoE), AC Power, DC Power, and Battery. Some Swann models can even be powered by a solar panel. Lorex has a similar range of power options, including PoE, AC Power, DC Power, and Battery, and some models support solar panel power. 

Regarding data transmission, the majority of Swann cameras use either PoE or 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, while some of the models use coaxial cables for data transmission. However, Lorex offers additional versatility, with cameras supporting both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi frequencies and some models with PoE or coaxial cable connections.

Swann has a mix of cameras that communicate over IP and analog data formats, with some models supporting HD-AHD analog data format. Lorex also offers a mix of cameras with IP and analog data formats, along with a wider support for HD-TVI, HD-AHD, HD-CVI, and HD-CVBS analog data formats. This indicates that Lorex may provide more compatibility with various security systems and integration options.

Focusing on specific models, the Lorex U471AA-E is a versatile choice, as it supports multiple power options like DC Power, Battery, and Solar Panel, and can connect using both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi frequencies. The Swann SWIFI-XTRCM16G1PK, on the other hand, is a reliable contender with a battery and solar panel power option, and 2.4GHz Wi-Fi connectivity.

Night Vision

Both brands offer several camera models with night vision functionality. Night vision is essential for providing clear images in low light conditions or complete darkness. There are two types of night vision: Infrared, where the camera uses infrared LED lights to illuminate the scene without emitting visible light; and Full Color night vision, which provides colored images in low light conditions through an advanced sensor or a built-in spotlight.

Swann cameras tend to use Infrared and Full Color night vision, utilizing either low light sensor technology or a spotlight to achieve colored images at night. On the other hand, Lorex cameras incorporate Infrared night vision and may include Full Color night vision through a low light sensor in combination with a spotlight or a low light sensor alone.

One important feature related to night vision is the infrared distance, measured in feet, which indicates how far the camera can capture images clearly in total darkness or ambient lighting. Swann cameras offer a range of infrared distances, reaching up to 200 feet with ambient lighting and 150 feet in total darkness. In contrast, Lorex cameras tend to have a shorter range, with some models capturing images up to 135 feet in ambient lighting and 98 feet in total darkness.

When it comes to built-in spotlights, Swann offers more models with this feature than Lorex. These spotlights help to illuminate the scene, providing a clearer view and enabling Full-Color night vision. Additionally, some Swann camera models have active deterrence technology in combination with the spotlight to discourage potential intruders.

Lorex also offers some camera models with integrated spotlights, and active deterrence is available in a few models as well. Lorex is known for its camera models with advanced low-light sensors that provide color images with minimal light without needing a spotlight.

Storage & Interoperability

Firstly, when it comes to on-board storage capacity, Lorex tends to offer more options with built-in microSD card slots. This feature allows you to store footage directly on the camera itself, providing more options for data storage and retrieval. Many Lorex models, such as the W881AAD-E, W452ASDB-E, and F461AQD-E, can accommodate microSD cards with capacities of up to 256GB. Swann also provides on-board storage for several models like SWIFI-COREPRO, SWIFI-TRACKCM32GB, and SWIFI-BUDDY with support for microSD cards of varying capacities.

In addition to on-board storage, most Swann cameras offer storage options such as Network Video Recorders (NVRs), DVRs or cloud-based storage, while some Lorex cameras also utilize Network Attached Storage (NAS) or FTP servers. This difference in storage options may influence your choice between the two brands, depending on your preference for centralized or cloud-based storage. 

Interoperability is an essential factor to consider when choosing security cameras. This aspect allows for more seamless integration with other security devices in your home. While most Swann cameras listed in my research do not provide specific interoperability features, a few Lorex models like LNZ44P4BW, LNZ44P12B, and LNE9383 feature integration protocols such as ONVIF, RTSP, and CGI. ONVIF (Open Network Video Interface Forum) is particularly noteworthy as it promotes standardized communication between different IP-based security products, ensuring better compatibility with a wide range of devices.

Audio

Starting with audio features, it is evident that both Swann and Lorex offer models equipped with two-way audio. This means that you can communicate with someone in front of the camera remotely, which can be useful if you want to speak to a visitor, delivery person, or even to deter an intruder. The majority of models from both brands come with an integrated microphone and speaker, enabling the two-way audio function. 

In terms of alarm systems, it's worth noting that Swann and Lorex cameras offer slightly different features. While many Swann models come with an integrated siren alarm, not all Lorex models do. For example, Swann's SWIFI-SLMFLCW model has a siren loudness of 75 dB, and the W881AAD-E model from Lorex has a 110 dB siren. These sirens can be crucial in alerting you and scaring away potential intruders, so it's worth considering this when choosing which brand to purchase. However, if you're not too concerned about having an alarm, then you have more flexibility in choosing a suitable model from either brand.

Intelligence

One key aspect that many customers prioritize in security cameras is smart integration with popular voice assistants like Alexa and Google Assistant. Swann offers integration with both voice assistants in many of its camera models, as well as support for Chromecast, Echo Show, Fire TV, and Google Nest Hub. On the other hand, Lorex also provides strong support for Alexa and Google Assistant in some models, and a few even offer integration with Chromecast, Fire TV, and Apple TV. 

Note: Some integrations and intelligence features are restricted to those with the Swann Secure+ membership.

Another important consideration for potential buyers is the ability to configure motion zones and sensitivity. Motion zones allow you to focus on specific areas for monitoring while adjusting motion sensitivity helps reduce false alarms. Most Swann and Lorex camera models in my research offer configurable motion zones and sensitivity, however, this feature is limited to the cloud plan for some Swann models.

Motion alerts are crucial for a security camera system, as they notify users of any detected motion in real-time. Both Swann and Lorex cameras offer push notifications for motion alerts, helping users stay informed and react quickly in case of any suspicious activities. Again, some Swann models require the cloud plan for rich alerts and notifications.

A major selling point for security cameras is their ability to accurately detect people, vehicles, and other objects. These smart motion detection features play a crucial role in reducing false alarms and providing more reliable monitoring. Swann cameras come equipped with various detection capabilities such as person detection, vehicle detection, face detection, object detection, heat maps, and even animal detection in some models. On the other hand, Lorex cameras also showcase an impressive suite of detection features including person detection, vehicle detection, object detection, face detection, animal detection, people counting, and heat maps.

In addition to standard motion detection, some security cameras also offer other event triggers such as abandoned object detection, missing object detection, and video tampering. Both Swann and Lorex cameras feature models with these advanced event triggers, making both brands ideal for customers who require heightened security and monitoring options.

Lastly, perimeter protection features like intrusion detection and line crossing are valuable additions for many security-conscious consumers. Some Swann camera models offer this added layer of security, making them ideal for users who need comprehensive monitoring for specific perimeters.

PTZ

Regarding PTZ features, not all security cameras from either brand come with these capabilities. PTZ stands for Pan-Tilt-Zoom and allows a camera to cover a wider range and move in different directions. These features can be particularly useful for monitoring large spaces or when tracking an object in a specific area is necessary. In my research, I found that only one Swann model has PTZ functionality whereas Lorex offers several PTZ models. This could be an important factor to consider if you require a camera that can pan, tilt, and zoom.

Looking at optical zoom capabilities, a clear difference can be seen between the two brands. Optical zoom works by moving the camera lens and maintaining the camera's resolution while zooming in or out. This typically results in better image quality compared to digital zoom. In my research, I found that while none of the Swann models offer optical zoom, several Lorex models do, including the models LNZ44P4BW, LNZ44P12B, LNE9383, LNZ81P25, and LNZ2925SC. This makes Lorex the better option if optical zoom is a crucial feature for your home security needs.

Lastly, a closer look at the pan and tilt functionality across these brands highlights that Lorex has more models with these features. Cameras with pan and tilt capabilities can move in horizontal and vertical directions, providing a larger coverage area. These features are present in some of the Lorex models, such as the LNZ44P4BW, LNZ44P12B, F461AQD-E, and LNZ2925SC. Conversely, the only Swann model with both pan and tilt functionality is the SWNHD-900PT.

In conclusion, if PTZ features and optical zoom capabilities are important to you, Lorex seems to be the better choice offering more models with these options. However, both brands do offer cameras with digital zoom capabilities, and selecting a model ultimately comes down to the specific combination of features and design you prefer. Always double-check the specifications of each camera model to ensure it meets your individual requirements.

Camera & Lens

Starting with Swann, most of their cameras have a Fixed Focus lens type, ensuring sharp and clear images without the need for manual adjustments. Fields of view (FoV) in their cameras vary, with some models covering a wide range of 180 degrees (e.g., SWIFI-TRACKCM32GB) and some having an FoV around 90 degrees (e.g., SWPRO-4KMSD). In terms of resolution quality, Swann cameras offer a diverse range including 2MP (1920×1080) HD, 4MP (2560×1440) and 4K (3840×2160) Ultra HD models. They even have a 12MP option (SWNHD-1200BE).

In comparison, Lorex also offers a range of lens types with Fixed Focus being the most common, but they also provide some motorized and manual varifocal options (e.g., LNZ44P4BW and LNE9383). Their resolutions also span 2MP (1920×1080) HD, 4MP (2560×1440), 2K (2560×1920) and 4K (3840×2160) Ultra HD models, similar to Swann. 

However, Lorex cameras generally have slightly wider fields of view than Swann's, with some models going as high as 164 degrees while others have a more standard FoV of around 105-108 degrees (e.g., E896AB).

Device

Swann cameras offer a diverse range of dimensions with models like the SWNHD-1200BE (5.94×2.76×2.76″) being compact and discreet, while the SWNHD-900PT (6.5×4.8×9.4″) is larger, providing a more noticeable security presence. Similarly, Lorex cameras also have varying sizes, with the U424AA-E (8.5×7.5×3.7″) designed for those who prefer large, visible cameras, and the E896AB (2.9×6.9×2.9″) being smaller for more discreet placements.

IP rating indicates how well a camera is protected against dust and water ingress. Both Swann and Lorex offer cameras with IP66 and IP67 weather-resistant ratings. Swann cameras such as the SWNHD-900BE and SWNHD-887MSFB have an IP66 rating, while Lorex cameras like the LNE9383 and E896AB have a higher IP67 rating, providing better protection against water and dust.

Materials used in cameras can differ as well, with some Lorex models featuring heavy-duty metal, aluminum, and polycarbonate, such as the LNZ44P12B, E896AB, and C883DA-Z models respectively. While specific materials are not mentioned for most Swann cameras, some come in aluminum, like the SWNVW-800CAM and SWNHD-886MSD models.

Operating temperatures vary between the two brands. Most Swann camera models have a maximum operating temperature of 122°F-131°F and a minimum of -22°F. Lorex cameras have a slightly broader operating temperature range in comparison. Some Lorex cameras like the LNZ44P12B can withstand up to 158°F and as low as -40°F, providing greater durability in extreme weather conditions.

Lastly, the weight of the cameras can impact the ease of installation and positioning. Swann models range from lightweight ones like SWWHD-INDCAM (100g) to heavier options like SWPRO-4KDER (2000g). Lorex also offers a variety of weights, with lighter models like the U471AA-E (190g) and heavier models like the V261LCD-E (1.8kg).

Lorex vs Swann: Camera Models Included in Research

Sources

https://www.lorex.com/

https://us.swann.com/

The post Top 5 Key Differences Between Lorex vs Swann: Comprehensive Comparison Guide appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

Honeywell vs ecobee

9.3

Ecobee 4 Smart Thermostat

WinnerIntegrated voice assistant

View Price

9.2

Honeywell Home T9 WIFI Smart Thermostat

Great sensor range

View Price

So, why would you want a smart thermostat? The real question is, why wouldn’t you? A smart thermostat allows you to control your HVAC system using your phone or voice while allowing it to become more efficient over time!

Ecobee has taken a leaf from the Nest thermostat with a built-in feature to learn from your routine to create customized schedules. It can also recommend changes to your existing schedule based on your routine. Whereas Honeywell is a better choice for those who want to be able to program the settings to their liking.

Ecobee 4 Smart Thermostat

Score: 9.3

View Price

Honeywell Home T9 WIFI Smar…

Score: 9.2

View Price

Smart Thermostat Head to Head

9.3

Ecobee 4 Smart Thermostat

Integrated voice assistant

Ecobee SmartThermostat with Voice Control uses SmartSensor technology to adjust temperatures based on room occupancy. It claims to help in saving up to 23% on your HVAC costs every year. The smart thermostat takes less than an hour to install!

You can control the thermostat with the user-friendly phone app from your smartphone, tablet, computer, or Apple Watch. The thermostat has Alexa built-in which is a great feature, particularly if you don’t have an Echo speaker lying around. With Alexa you can adjust the temperature settings using your voice.

View Price
On Amazon.com

Other Shops

View Price on Ecobee.com

9.2

Honeywell Home T9 WIFI Smart Thermostat

Great sensor range

vs

Model(s): RCHT9610WFSW2003

Honeywell Home T9 WIFI Smart Thermostat allows you to change the temperature in any given room manually or let the Smart Room Sensors figure out which rooms are most populated and thus should be focused on. That said, the thermostat can handle more than one room at once!

Adjust the temperature on your thermostat with just a few clicks on your phone or use the programming feature to fit your schedule.

View Price
On Amazon.com

Pros

• Elegant design with a glass finish and a touch display.
• Touchscreen interface and an intuitive app make the thermostat easy to use.
• Works well with most smart home systems and voice assistants, including Alexa and Google Assistant.

Cons

• Programming detailed and complex schedules can be a little tricky.

Pros

• The sensors reach up to 200 feet and even further.
• The touchscreen display is stylish and easy to operate with a friendly user interface.
• The thermostat is easy to install yourself and compatible with most homes.

Cons

• The thermostat cannot learn your schedule automatically, you need to program it manually.
• The mobile app can be slow when delivering real-time updates.

Installation

9.5

9.5

Both smart thermostats are relatively easy to install. Though the ease of installation will likely depend on your skills and experience, you don’t need to call in a professional unless you have a very specific HVAC configuration. 

Ecobee claims their thermostat can be installed in under 45 minutes with no extra help. There is a video that you can follow that will guide you through the installation process. You can also find a detailed guide on the official ecobee mobile app. If all else fails, the company invites you to call the support team and ask for help!

Honeywell Home claims that their thermostat is just as easy to install as their competitors'. There is an installation guide available that you can follow closely for easy setup. There is a power adapter included in the package that replaces a C-Wire to provide a constant stream of power to the device. That makes the thermostat even easier to install and highly compatible with most HVAC systems. 

Overall, it appears as though both contenders offer quick and easy installation. If you’re worried about setting things up, you can’t go wrong with either option.

Style & Design

9.7

9.3

Sure, we’ll get to talking about the technical features and capabilities of these thermostats, but first, let’s discuss style and design. This is a category where both products really shine! 

The ecobee smart thermostat has a beautiful shape that is neither extravagant nor too harsh or boring. Its lack of sharp edges automatically makes it feel cosy, while its crisp glass display allows for easy viewing and programming. Overall, the smart thermostat will look quite, for lack of a better word, smart, in your home!

The thermostat offered by Honeywell Home is slightly less interesting to look at. The shape is nice and soft, and the white colorway will fit in well with any color variations on your wall. The beauty of the T9 smart thermostat is in its simplicity. If you’re looking for a thermostat that will blend in with the surroundings, this is a great option.

Though both thermostats are beautiful in their design, the Honeywell Home model is slightly underwhelming in comparison to the ecobee.

Programming & Learning Capabilities

8.9

8.9

Finally, we’re getting to the important stuff! Programming and learning capabilities are important features customers look for in a smart thermostat. 

The smart thermostat by ecobee can learn your daily schedule and even give you recommendations that will help lower heating costs. The occupancy sensor will automatically adjust the temperature when you leave the room/house, and again when you return. Programming the thermostat to follow a complex schedule can be tricky, but you can always ask the support team for help, or let the thermostat adjust the temperature automatically.

The T9 smart thermostat by Honeywell Home is quite the opposite. It cannot learn your schedule automatically, so you need to program it yourself. You can choose the temperature for each room manually or let the thermostat do that for you. It does so by using occupancy sensors to detect which rooms are in use. Naturally, the ones that are in use get the most comfort, be it heat in the winter, or cool air in the summer. 

Smartphone App

9.1

9.3

One of the features that make a smart thermostat smart is the official app you can use to control the device. Of course, both ecobee and Honeywell Home have their very own apps that make changing the temperature in your home easier than ever.

The ecobee app not only lets you control your indoor climate, but also offers a myriad of other helpful features. These include notifications sent when the system needs maintenance. You will also get a notification if the temperature in your house has become dangerously low which can lead to frozen or burst pipes. 

Honeywell Home lets you monitor the usage of all your Honeywell Home devices. You will get a handy reminder when you need to change the air filter, as well as when temperatures fall or rise way above the norm, leading to possible problems. Your thermostat can also determine when you’re home or away using your phone’s location. It can then adjust the temperature automatically and shave a few dollars off your electricity bill for the month.

Smart Features, Integrations & Extensibility

9.5

9.3

What’s a smart thermostat without any smart features? Here are some capabilities that help the ecobee smart thermostat and Honeywell Home T9 Wi-Fi smart thermostat stand out from the crowd. 

The ecobee smart thermostat boasts a SmartSensor feature that allows the device to adjust the temperature all on its own. The eco+ software maximizes efficiency and reduces wasted energy in your home. 

The smart thermostat by ecobee works with many smart home systems, including Google Assistant, Apple HomeKit, Alexa, Samsung SmartThings, and IFTTT. And as if that wasn’t enough, the thermostat also has Alexa built-in. Talk to your thermostat, ask for weather updates, play music, and make use of the Alexa Calling feature!

The Honeywell Home device uses smart room sensors to determine which rooms are occupied and keep them comfortable. Use Auto Home and Away Scheduling to keep your energy costs at a minimum and reduce waste. Let the sensors change according to your lifestyle and enjoy maximum comfort with the Honeywell Home T9 Wi-Fi Smart Thermostat! The device is compatible with Alexa, Google Assistant, and other smart home systems.

Technical Comparison (ecobee vs Honeywell)

	ecobee4 Smart Thermostat	Honeywell Home T9
Item Weight	1.72 pounds	1.46 pounds
Product Dimensions	4.29 x 4.29 x 1 inches	3.7 x 4.92 x 0.94 inches
Style	Smart Thermostat	Thermostat with Sensor
Included Components	Ecobee Smart Thermostat mounting plate, Ecobee Smart Thermostat, SmartSensor w/ detachable stand, Install & Quickstart guide, Wire Labels, Large Trim Plate	Thermostat, Mounting Hardware, Sensor
Battery Cell Type	Lithium-Ion	Alkaline
Warranty Description	3-year limited	1-year warranty
Control Through iOS and Android App	Yes	Yes
Works with Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Samsung SmartThings, etc.	Yes	Yes
Amazon Alexa Built-In	Yes	No
Color	Black	White

Conclusion

Both thermostats we’ve reviewed showed great capabilities and scored almost the same. The smart thermostat by ecobee is our winner because of its sleek design, voice control, and SmartSensor features. The Honeywell Smart Thermostat is almost as good, as it offers an great sensor range and allows you to program settings with ease.

So between Honeywell vs ecobee, which one are you leaning towards? Let us know in the comments below!

Sources

ecobee.com
honeywellhome.com

The post Honeywell vs ecobee: Smart Thermostat Head to Head! appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

In this comprehensive article, I thoroughly compare and assess the features, capabilities, and performance of 9 Arlo cameras and 31 Reolink security cameras across nine key categories. 

With a list of model codes included for reference, you'll have all the information you need to decide which brand best suits your preferences.

So, let the battle of Arlo versus Reolink begin as we determine the ultimate winner in this head-to-head showdown!

The Winners

Arlo and Reolink have a lot in common, such as offering budget-friendly cameras, diverse power options, and no monthly fees. 

Best for Plug and Play Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Comprehensive Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Plug and Play Security: Arlo

When it comes to having a straightforward security solution, Arlo is my winner.

With its reliance on battery power, Arlo cameras are incredibly easy to install, allowing for flexible and hassle-free placement. 

Arlo also excels in terms of smart home integration options, offering a wider range of compatibility with other devices and platforms. Its smart motion detection is consistently reliable, ensuring that you receive accurate and timely alerts for any detected activity. 

Additionally, Arlo provides customizable motion detection features, allowing you to fine-tune the camera's settings to suit your specific security needs. 

With the inclusion of WDR (Wide Dynamic Range) in its models, Arlo ensures enhanced image quality, even in challenging lighting conditions, and a higher field of view (FOV) for comprehensive coverage. 

Best for Comprehensive Security: Reolink

When it comes to a secure and dependable solution, Reolink is my winner.

With both wireless and professional-grade wired devices, Reolink offers a reliable and stable connection, ensuring uninterrupted surveillance coverage. 

Reolink also offers diverse storage options, allowing you to customize how you store and access your valuable footage. 

Their cameras also excel in interoperability, effortlessly integrating with industry-standard protocols like ONVIF, RTSP, and P2P, providing seamless compatibility with various security systems and devices. 

But that's not all – Reolink also offers camera models with optical zoom and motorized lenses that enable precise and adjustable monitoring, capturing even the smallest details with utmost clarity. 

They also have advanced PTZ (Pan-Tilt-Zoom) models, which empowers you to cover a wide area and track any movement with ease. 

Winners per Category

Overview

Camera Type

Arlo mainly offers spotlight and bullet cameras, while Reolink has a more diverse range, including bullet, turret, PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom), PT (pan-tilt), and multi-sensor panoramic cameras. 

Power and Data Options

Most Arlo cameras offer wireless data connection and battery power while Reolink's selection includes wireless data and battery-powered cameras, as well as wired data and power models. 

Pricing

Both Arlo and Reolink offer budget, mid-range, and high-end camera models. Arlo's prices generally start at $99.99 with the Essential Spotlight Camera, while Reolink's budget-friendly options start as low as $44.99 with the Lumus Spotlight. This makes Reolink a more accessible option for those with a limited budget.

Warranty

Lastly, warranty duration is an essential consideration when buying security cameras. Arlo offers a standard 1-year warranty on all their cameras, while Reolink provides a longer 2-year warranty.

Power & Data Options

In analyzing power and data feeds, I specifically looked at different power, and data transmission options from the Arlo and Reolink camera lineup. 

Winner: Reolink

Arlo focuses on wireless power options and data transmission for its models for those who prefer straightforward security solutions, while Reolink provides more flexibility on power and data connections.

Wired vs Wireless

Arlo generally offers battery-operated cameras with the exception of its indoor cameras that run on wired power. Additionally, its Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi, Pro 3, and Essential models also support solar power. 

Comparatively, the majority of Reolink models support Power over Ethernet (PoE) and DC power, with some models also providing battery and solar panel support like the Argus series. 

Data Transmission Options

Most Arlo cameras support Wi-Fi connectivity, with some models using both 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequencies. The Arlo lineup also has a variety of wireless options available, including the Arlo Pro 5S 2K and Arlo Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi.

On the other hand, Reolink cameras primarily use PoE for data transmission, which allows for a more reliable connection and fewer signal interference issues compared to Wi-Fi. Several Reolink models, such as the Reolink E1 Zoom and Argus 3 Pro Solar, support both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi frequencies, offering more flexibility in wireless connectivity.

Additionally, when comparing the indoor-specific models, Arlo has the Essential Indoor camera, which relies on AC power and 2.4GHz Wi-Fi for connectivity. Reolink offers the E1 Pro and E1 Zoom, both using DC power and supporting both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi frequencies.

Storage & Interoperability

In terms of storage and smart interactions of both brands, I specifically focused on storage capacity, different storage options offered, and interoperability features.

Winner: Reolink

While Arlo is a reliable option for those looking for simple storage solutions and hassle-free integration with its own ecosystem, Reolink's diverse storage options, larger on-board capacity, and extensive interoperability make it a versatile choice that caters to various user preferences, especially those seeking compatibility with non-Reolink products.

Storage Capacity

When it comes to on-board storage capacity, Reolink cameras outshine Arlo. Most Reolink models offer 128GB or 256GB of built-in storage capacity, while Arlo only has the Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi model that comes with 2048 MB on-board storage.

A larger storage capacity is essential for users who want to keep footage for longer periods, enabling them to review past videos when necessary.

Storage Options

Most Arlo models support microSD, Cloud, and USB Flash Drive storage, while few of them, such as the Essential Indoor model, use Wireless Hub and Cloud storage. On the other hand, Reolink offers more storage options for its cameras, including microSD, NVR, FTP, and Cloud. 

Interoperability

Almost all Reolink cameras support various protocols such as ONVIF, RTSP, and P2P, making them compatible with third-party software and hardware solutions. This allows users to integrate their Reolink cameras with surveillance systems they might already have in place. 

In contrast, Arlo cameras do not mention support for these industry-standard protocols, which may limit their compatibility with other products in the market.

Intelligence

Here, I focused on smart integration functionalities, smart motion detection, and customization of motion zones and sensitivity. 

Winner: Arlo

It has a wider range of smart home integration options, more consistent smart motion detection, and customizable motion detection features across models compared to Reolink.

Smart Home Integrations

Arlo cameras generally offer a wider range of integrations with devices such as Alexa, Google Assistant, Amazon Sidewalk, Apple HomeKit, IFTTT, and SmartThings, depending on the model. 

In comparison, Reolink cameras commonly integrate with Google Assistant, Chromecast, and Google Nest Hub.

Configurable Motion Zones and Sensitivity

Both Arlo and Reolink offer cameras with configurable motion zones, which allow users to outline specific areas where they want the motion to be detected.

The majority of Arlo cameras come equipped with this feature, while most Reolink cameras also have it.

Another aspect of motion detection worth considering is motion sensitivity. All Arlo models and a majority of Reolink models in this research allow users to adjust the sensitivity levels of their motion detection. 

Motion Alerts

When it comes to motion alerts, both Arlo and Reolink cameras can send push notifications and email alerts when motion is detected.

Smart Motion Detection

Smart motion detection features like person detection, vehicle detection, and object detection are available in most Arlo camera models. Additionally, some models including the Essential Wireless, Essential Wired, Essential Indoor, and Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi even have animal detection.

Reolink cameras also have smart motion detection features, such as person detection, vehicle detection, and animal detection, depending on the model. A few Reolink models like the RLC-823A 16X, RLC-830A, and RLC-833A have object detection as well.  

Audio

With regards to the audio capabilities of Arlo and Reolink, I specifically looked at integrated microphones and speakers, alarms, and sirens. 

Winner: Arlo

While both Arlo and Reolink offer security cameras with essential features like audio recording, and two-way audio, Arlo features integrated sirens in all its camera models included in this research compared to Reolink.

Two-way Audio and Integrated Microphones and Speakers

Both Arlo and Reolink offer cameras with integrated microphones, allowing for audio recording along with video. 

Two-way audio is another valuable feature that enables you to communicate through the camera with people visiting your property. 

In this aspect, all Arlo models have two-way audio with integrated microphones and speakers. However, this feature is not present in RLC-410W, RLC-520A, RLC-820A, RLC-510A, RLC-542WA, RLC-511W, RLC-810A, and RLC-822A models of Reolink.

Integrated Sirens

Integrated sirens or alarms are additional security measures to scare off intruders. While most Reolink models include an integrated siren, all Arlo models in this research come with this feature.

Video Specs

When analyzing the video functionalities of each brand’s camera lineup, I looked at the mode of recording, video coding formats, wide dynamic range, and maximum supported frame rates of footage. 

Winner: Draw

Both Arlo and Reolink provide models with continuous and motion-activated recording and efficient video compression formats. While Arlo has WDR capabilities, Reolink has higher frame rates per second for better video quality.

Continuous vs Motion-Activated Recording

Arlo offers continuous recording only in its Ultra 2 and Essential Indoor models, whereas Reolink provides this feature in their RLC-511WA, RLC-523WA, RLC-542WA, and RLC-410W models, among others. Continuous recording is a valuable feature for those looking for round-the-clock monitoring without interruptions.

Both brands offer motion-activated recording, a popular feature that enables the cameras to start recording only when movement is detected. 

In Arlo, it is integrated into most models like Pro 5S 2K, Essential Wireless, Essential Wired, Essential Indoor, Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi, and Pro 3. 

Reolink offers this feature in a wide range of models, such as Reolink E1 Zoom, Argus Eco, Argus 2E, Argus 3 Pro Solar, Go Plus, Argus 3, Go PT Plus, Argus Pro, and Argus 2.

Video Coding Formats

For video coding formats, Arlo supports either H.264 or H.265 (mainly in Pro 3, Pro 4, Pro 5S 2K) playback, while Reolink commonly supports H.264 in some models (E1 Pro, RLC-410W, RLC-511WA), and H.265 in others (Argus 3 Pro, Duo 4G, RLC-823A, RLC-810A). 

This distinction is essential since H.265 offers better video compression, reducing bandwidth and storage requirements without compromising image quality.

WDR

When it comes to Wide Dynamic Range (WDR), which helps balance exposure levels in high-contrast scenes, Arlo models such as Pro 5S 2K, Pro 3, Pro 4, and Ultra 2 utilize Digital WDR/HDR. 

Maximum Supported Frame Rates

In terms of maximum supported frame rate, Reolink offers a clearer picture with rates ranging from 15 (Argus Eco, Argus 2E, Argus 3 Pro Solar, Go Plus, Argus 3, Go PT Plus, Argus Pro, Argus 2) to 30 frames per second (FPS) (RLC-511WA, RLC-410W, RLC-523WA, RLC-542WA). 

Frame rate impacts the smoothness of the footage, with a higher frame rate providing smoother video quality.

Camera Lens Specs

With regard to the camera and lens specifications of each brand’s lineup, I focused on the field of view, resolution, lens type, and image sensor size.

Winner: Reolink

Both Arlo and Reolink provide models with continuous and motion-activated recording and efficient video compression formats. While Arlo has WDR capabilities, Reolink has higher frame rates per second for better video quality.

Field of View

Arlo cameras generally offer a wider field of view, ranging from 130 degrees to 180 degrees. Reolink cameras, on the other hand, mostly offer narrower fields of view, from 80 degrees up to 150 degrees, with some exceptions. A wider field of view can be helpful for covering larger areas with fewer cameras.

Camera Resolution

Arlo cameras come in HD (1536 x 1536), 2MP (1920×1080), 4MP (2560×1440), and even 4K (3840×2160) resolutions, while Reolink offers cameras in 2MP, 4MP, 5MP, 8MP, and 12MP resolutions. Having higher resolution cameras provide more detailed images, which can be helpful if you need to identify faces or license plates within the footage.

Lens Type

Most Arlo cameras in my research feature fixed focus lenses, meaning the lens does not have the ability to zoom in or out. Reolink, on the other hand, has a mix of fixed focus lenses and motorized lenses, which allow for optical zooming and more flexible viewing options.

Image Sensor Size

Lastly, image sensor size is another important aspect to consider, as it can impact image quality. Arlo cameras mostly feature 1/3″ or 1/2″ image sensors, while Reolink uses a variety of sizes, including 1/3″, 1/2.7″, 1/2.8″, and 1/2.49″ image sensors.

Pan-Tilt-Zoom

In analyzing the pan, tilt, and zoom capabilities of the cameras, I focused on digital and optical zoom, and pan and tilt features and angles. 

Winner: Reolink

Reolink offers a variety of models with optical zoom and advanced panning and tilting features for users who prefer more comprehensive monitoring.

Zoom Capabilities

Digital zoom allows you to zoom in on your camera's live or recorded footage, but it may lose some image quality in the process.

Most of the Arlo camera models I analyzed offer a digital zoom feature with a 12x magnification, while the optical zoom feature is not available in these models. 

In contrast, many Reolink camera models offer an optical zoom feature, which uses physical lenses to zoom in without losing image quality. The optical zoom magnification varies from 3x to 16x, depending on the camera model. 

Pan and Tilt Features

The pan feature allows you to move your camera's view horizontally, while the tilt function lets you move it vertically. This increases the field of view and coverage area for your camera, making it possible to track movement or get different views of your property.

Arlo cameras mostly lack the pan and tilt features.  On the other hand, several Reolink camera models offer both pan and tilt features. For example, the Reolink E1 Zoom model has a pan angle of 355 degrees and a tilt angle of 50 degrees.

Advanced PTZ Features

Some Reolink models, such as the RLC-823A 16X, offer more advanced PTZ features like preset points and tracking capabilities. 

Presets allow you to save specific camera positions and angles, making it easy to switch between different views without manual adjustments. 

The tracking function can detect and follow moving objects, providing enhanced security and monitoring. These advanced PTZ features, however, are not available in the Arlo cameras I analyzed.

Night Vision

Here, I take into consideration various night vision functionalities, infrared distance, and spotlight features of the camera models from Arlo and Reolink.

Winner: Draw

Both brands offer camera models with night vision and spotlight features, with Arlo having these in a majority of their cameras. While Reolink has selected models with longer infrared distance ranges and a higher number of IR LEDs.

Night Vision Functionality

In terms of night vision functionality – which is essential for capturing clear video footage in low-light conditions – both Arlo and Reolink models excel in this aspect. 

However, Reolink cameras tend to have a longer infrared distance in total darkness. For instance, the Reolink E1 Zoom provides a 40 feet range, while the RLC-823A 16X model boasts an impressive 262 feet range. On the other hand, Arlo cameras, like the Essential Wireless model, typically go up to 20 to 25 feet. 

Infrared Distance

Arlo cameras offer both infrared and full-color night vision via an integrated spotlight, such as the Pro 3 and Ultra 2 cameras. This provides a more detailed and vibrant image compared to traditional infrared night vision. In contrast, Reolink also has models with this dual-functionality, like the RLC-833A and RLC-1224A, though not as widespread.

Spotlight Features

Arlo has a higher number of models offering this feature, like the Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi, which also boasts a powerful 850 lumens output.

In comparison, Reolink has models with spotlight features as well, such as the Argus 3 Pro Solar, but not as abundant. However, some Reolink models can reach as high as 945 lumens in RLC-523WA, which makes them ideal for brightening up a larger area.

Number of IR LEDs

The number of infrared LEDs (IR LEDs) employed in the cameras can vary significantly, depending on the model. To give a clearer image in low-light conditions, more IR LEDs are generally preferred. 

For instance, Reolink's RLC-520A uses 18 IR LEDs, whereas Arlo's Pro 3 has only two.

Device Quality

With regard to the device quality, I primarily focused on outdoor camera models offered by both brands, their weather resistance, operating temperatures, materials used, weight, and unique features. 

Winner: Reolink

Reolink cameras provide higher IP ratings, and a wider range of operating temperatures, and are generally made with durable materials to withstand varying weather conditions. 

Indoor and Outdoor Options

Arlo offers indoor options like the Essential Indoor, but most models are designed for outdoor use with weather-resistant features. 

On the other hand, Reolink has a variety of cameras to choose from for both indoor and outdoor use. Models like Reolink E1 Zoom are specifically designed for indoor use, while others such as RLC-823A 16X and Argus Eco are built to withstand outdoor conditions with IP66 and IP65 ratings, respectively.

IP Rating

The weather resistance of each camera is determined by an Ingress Protection (IP) rating. A higher IP rating indicates a better resistance to water and dust, making the camera more suitable for outdoor use. 

Arlo cameras, in general, possess a weather-resistant rating, while Reolink cameras have more specific IP ratings that range from IP64 (RLC-520A, Go PT Plus) to IP66 (RLC-823A, RLC-833A).

Operating Temperature

Arlo cameras can generally withstand temperatures as low as -4°F and as high as 113°F. Reolink cameras offer a wider temperature range, usually between 14°F and 131°F, making them suitable for more extreme climates.

Build Material

In terms of build material, both brands offer durable options. Most Arlo cameras do not specify the material used, but they are all considered weather-resistant. On the other hand, many Reolink models feature metal or metal aluminum cases, ensuring more durability and protection.

Weight

Weight plays a role in the portability and ease of installation of a camera. Arlo cameras generally weigh between 113 g and 650 g, while Reolink cameras have a broader weight range, from 185 g (Lumus) to 1800 g (RLC-823A).

This means that Reolink cameras can vary more significantly in size and heft, so you will need to carefully consider your mounting options when selecting a camera.

Camera Models Included in Research

Citations

https://www.arlo.com/en-us/

https://reolink.us.com/

The post Arlo vs Reolink: Head to Head appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

With distinct product offerings they have notable differences worth discussing that will hopefully help you pick the right choice for your needs.

To provide you with the essentials on their camera lineup, I reviewed a total of 43 security cameras, including 11 from Ring and 32 from Reolink in this head-to-head analysis. At the end of the article, you can find a detailed list of the product codes that I analyzed. Let’s get started!

The Winners

Best for Simple Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Cost-Effective Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Simple Security: Ring

If you are looking for a hassle-free DIY security solution, Ring is my winner.

With its user-friendly setup process and a range of convenient features, like the integrated alarm, Ring provides an added layer of security by allowing users to sound an alarm remotely to deter potential intruders. 

The tight integration with the Amazon Alexa ecosystem enhances convenience by enabling users to control their Ring cameras and receive alerts through simple voice commands or via a FireTV, further simplifying the monitoring and management of their security system. 

Best for Cost-Effective Security: Reolink

If you are looking for value for money and reliability, Reolink is my winner. 

Reolink offers budget-friendly options, making it accessible to users with varying budgets and a 2-year warranty on most of its products, providing peace of mind and ensuring long-term support for customers. 

Despite its affordability, Reolink doesn't compromise on features and quality. It can integrate into various smart ecosystems, allowing users to expand their security system and enjoy seamless compatibility with other smart devices. 

Reolink cameras also boast decent night vision capabilities, ensuring clear monitoring and recording in low-light conditions and clearer resolutions and motorized lenses, providing users with the ability to adjust the viewing angle for optimal coverage.

Winners per Category

Overview

Ring 

Founded in 2013, the company started with the development of the Ring Video Doorbell, which allowed homeowners to see and talk to visitors at their front door from anywhere using a smartphone. 

Today, Ring offers various camera types such as video doorbells, floodlights, spotlights, and bullet cameras. Some notable models include the high-end Video Doorbell Elite, the mid-range Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, and the Video Doorbell 4 which is wireless and battery-powered.

While Amazon acquired Ring in 2018, it continues to operate as an independent brand with its own line of products and services.

Reolink

As a brand of security cameras founded in 2009 by a group of tech enthusiasts in Hong Kong, Reolink initially focused on developing and manufacturing IP cameras for home and business use, but it has since expanded its product line to provide a wider variety of camera types such as PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom), PT (pan-tilt), turret, bullet, spotlight, dome, and even a multi-sensor panoramic camera called Duo 4G. 

Some noteworthy models include the high-end RLC-823A 16X PTZ camera, the budget-friendly Argus Eco bullet camera, and the mid-range Go PT Plus pan-tilt camera.

Cloud Subscription Features

Ring has paid subscription plans, such as Ring Protect, which offer cloud storage for video recordings, advanced motion detection settings, and extended warranties on Ring devices. Reolink has a cloud storage offering however it also has a host of other storage options, if you don't want a monthly fee.

Price Segments

When it comes to price, Ring, and Reolink are quite different. You tend to get more bang for your buck with Reolink, in terms of camera specs and features. For the most up-to-date pricing, check out the packages above.

Warranty

Another point of distinction between the two brands is the standard warranty provided. Ring has a 1-year warranty on all the products included in this research, whereas Reolink provides a 2-year warranty on all models. 

This extended coverage on Reolink cameras may be appealing to customers who require long-term product support and protection.

Wired vs Wireless

When examining power and data options, I took a look at Ring and Reolink’s power connection options and data transmission features.

Winner: Draw

Both Ring and Reolink offer various power options including battery and solar alternatives, and in terms of data, both brands transmit data through 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi.

Power Options

When it comes to power options, both brands offer cameras with DC Power and AC Power, as evident in models like the Ring Pro 2 and the E1 Zoom.

Additionally, several Reolink cameras like the Argus Eco, and Ring cameras, such as the Video Doorbell 4, offer battery or solar panel alternatives, providing flexibility in installation and energy consumption. 

Notably, Ring's Video Doorbell Elite and a few Reolink models, including the RLC-823A 16X, support Power over Ethernet (PoE), which allows a single cable to supply both power and data connection.

Data Transmission Options

Wi-Fi 

In terms of connectivity, both Ring and Reolink cameras generally support 2.4GHz WiFi, with some models like the Ring Video Doorbell 4 and E1 Zoom also providing 5GHz WiFi connectivity. This dual-band WiFi capability can help deliver faster and more stable connections compared to single-band options. 

Power over Ethernet (PoE)

PoE is another data transmission method found in certain Ring and Reolink models, such as the RLC-823A 16X. Reolink takes it further with some models like the Go Plus offering 4G LTE connectivity for remote location installations where WiFi may not be available.

Storage & Interoperability

Here, I examined the storage capabilities of both brands and support for different existing smart ecosystems and security applications. 

Winner: Reolink

Reolink offers various storage options, including onboard storage of up to 256 GB without having to pay monthly fees for cloud storage, like Ring. Additionally, it is easier for Reolink to function cohesively with other existing components of a security system.

Storage Options

When it comes to storage options, Ring exclusively offers cloud storage for their security cameras, such as the Pro 2, Video Doorbell 4, Indoor Cam, and Floodlight Cam Wired Pro. 

This means that you'll need to subscribe to a monthly service plan to access your recorded videos. 

On the other hand, Reolink provides diverse storage options, including microSD, NVR, FTP, and cloud storage. 

Almost all Reolink models, such as the E1 Zoom and RLC-823A 16X, offer a local storage option, which means you can save recorded videos without relying entirely on an internet connection or a subscription.

In terms of camera onboard storage capacity, Reolink generally offers more generous storage options. Many of their models support up to 256 GB of storage, such as the RLC-830A, while others offer 128 GB, like the Argus 3 Pro Solar. 

Interoperability

A majority of Reolink products included in this research have a broader range of support for standards like ONVIF, RTSP, and P2P. This makes it easier for Reolink cameras to work with existing home security setups and third-party software. 

For example, the Reolink RLC-523WA supports RTSP and P2P, while RLC-820A supports Synology, RTSP, and P2P. 

In contrast, Ring models have limited interoperability options which may potentially limit integration with other security products or systems.

Audio

When examining the audio features of these brands, I specifically looked at microphones, speakers, and alarms.

Winner: Ring

While both brands offer integrated microphones and speakers for ease of communication, Ring stands out with its alarm and loudness, which can deter potential intruders, alert the occupants of a property, and even activate an emergency response.

Integrated Microphone and Speakers

A key feature common among the cameras of both brands is the presence of integrated microphones and speakers. This enables the cameras to capture audio, allowing for two-way communication. 

Integrated Alarm

The presence of an integrated alarm differentiates the two brands.  Most of the Ring models included in this research offer an integrated alarm, including the Pro 2, Video Doorbell, Indoor Cam, Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, and Spotlight Cam Plus Battery. 

In contrast, Reolink offers alarms in fewer models like the E1 Zoom, RLC-830A, Argus Eco, and Argus 2E.

Siren Loudness

Siren loudness can play a crucial role in deterring potential intruders. Some Ring cameras, like the Floodlight Cam Wired Pro and Spotlight Cam Plus Wired, feature a siren loudness of 110 dB. 

Night Vision Capabilities

Here, I scrutinized Ring and Reolink’s functionality on night vision, infrared distance, and spotlights.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink’s infrared and full-color night vision technology and its infrared distance specification allow clearer images even in complete darkness, which is ideal for securing the perimeters of the property. 

Night Vision

Both Ring and Reolink security cameras offer night vision functionality. Ring cameras typically use infrared technology, whereas Reolink offers both infrared technology and full-color night vision with most of its models such as the Lumus and Argus 3 Pro. 

Full-color night vision is generally achieved via a built-in spotlight or a low-light sensor. This feature provides clearer and more detailed color images in poorly lit conditions, which can be beneficial for identifying people or objects in the dark.

Infrared Distance

The infrared distance specification indicates how far the camera's illuminators can effectively illuminate the area in front of the camera. The longer the infrared distance of a camera, the more it is capable of providing clearer and more detailed images at greater distances in complete darkness.

In this head-to-head, Reolink cameras' infrared distance ranges from 33 – 100 meters. 

For example, the E1 Zoom has an infrared distance of up to 40 meters, while the RLC-823A 16X model boasts an impressive distance of 262 meters for pitch-black environments. 

Spotlight

Another noteworthy feature is the presence of spotlights in some security cameras. Several Reolink models, like the RLC-830A, RLC-1224A, and RLC-833A, come with powerful spotlights that have lumens ranging from 400 to 945. Similarly, Ring also offers spotlight-equipped models like the Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, which has an output of 2000 lumens.

Video Specs

When examining the video features of both brands, I specifically focused on functions such as continuous and motion-activated recording, frame rates, video format, wide dynamic range, and the number of video streams allowed.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink has a range of cameras that support both continuous recording and motion-activated recording.

Continuous vs Motion-activated Recording

With the exception of the Video Doorbell Elite, all other Ring cameras included in this research have motion-activated recording where the camera only starts recording when motion or activity is detected within its surveillance area.

On the other hand, many of Reolink’s cameras including the RLC-511WA, RLC-410W, E1 Pro, RLC-523WA, RLC-542WA, and RLC-511W boast continuous recording capabilities. 

Hence, if you prefer uninterrupted footage, I’d recommend Reolink. But if you are after capturing video footage of detected events, Ring is a good choice. 

Maximum Supported Frame Rate and Video Coding Format

Reolink cameras offer a range of frame rates, with some models supporting up to 30 frames per second like the RLC-511WA, RLC-410W, and RLC-520A.

In terms of video coding format, most Reolink cameras use H.264 or H.265 compression, which can provide high-quality video while using less storage and bandwidth. 

Number of Video Streams

Reolink cameras offer one or two simultaneous video streams, providing flexibility when monitoring live feeds and reviewing recorded footage. 

Smart Monitoring

Here, I focused on the cameras’ smart integration capabilities, configurable motion zones, sensitivity, motion alerts, and smart motion detection.

Winner: Ring

While Reolink integrates with Google’s ecosystem and Ring integrates with Amazon’s; Ring integration is very tight and works really well.

Smart integration

In terms of smart integrations, both brands have models that are compatible with popular voice assistants. 

Ring cameras like the Video Doorbell Elite, Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, and Spotlight Cam Plus Battery are primarily compatible with Alexa, Echo Show, and Fire TV, making them an ideal choice for Amazon-based smart home ecosystems. 

On the other hand, Reolink cameras offer a wider range of compatibility with Google Assistant, Chromecast, Google Nest Hub, and even some models supporting Alexa and Echo Show such as the Argus 3, Argus Pro, and Argus 2. This makes Reolink a versatile option for people using Google Home or a mixed ecosystem of smart devices.

Configurable Motion Zones and Sensitivity

When looking at configurable motion zones and sensitivity, both Ring and Reolink offer these features in most of their camera models. This allows users to customize the areas and level of motion sensitivity they want to receive alerts for, minimizing false alarms.

Motion Alerts 

Both brands provide push notifications as the primary alert method. However, many of the Reolink models also offer email alerts as an additional way to receive notifications when motion is detected. This can be useful for users who want multiple channels of communication for their security alerts.

Smart Motion Detection

All Ring models analyzed in my research offer person detection, some also include object detection. Reolink cameras boast a larger range of detection capabilities including person, vehicle, and animal detection in many models. This can be advantageous for users who want to monitor specific types of motion events and further tailor their notifications.

Build Quality

When examining the device build of both brands, I specifically looked at their weather resistance ratings, materials, temperature ranges, humidity levels, camera dimensions, and functionality. 

Winner: Reolink

Reolink cameras have higher IP ratings, sturdier materials, a broader temperature operating range, and higher humidity levels.

Weather Resistance

Ring security cameras are generally labeled as “weather-resistant,” while Reolink devices have specific Ingress Protection (IP) ratings to indicate durability, such as IP66 or IP65. 

The higher the IP rating, the more resistant a camera is to dust and water. This suggests that Reolink cameras may generally be more suitable for outdoor use.

Build Materials

Some Reolink models are built with sturdy metal aluminum cases like the RLC-511WA, and RLC-820A, which may provide better durability. 

On the other hand, Ring models are generally made of plastic while their video doorbells are a combination of plastic and metal materials.

Operating temperature range

Most Ring cameras have an operating temperature range of -5°F to 120°F or 122°F, while Reolink cameras typically have a broader range, starting at 14°F and going up to 131°F. 

This means that Reolink cameras might be more suitable for areas with extreme temperatures.

Camera Dimensions

Ring offers compact options, such as the Ring Pro 2 at 4.49 in. x 1.9 in. x .87 in., and the Video Doorbell 3, measuring 5.1 in. x 2.4 in x 1.1 in. Reolink also provides compact cameras, such as the Go PT Plus with dimensions of 98 x 112mm / 3.7 x 4.4 in and the Argus 2E at 96 x 61 x 58mm. 

Depending on your installation needs, both brands offer models with various sizes that can fit different spaces.

Maximum Humidity Levels 

Some Reolink cameras included in this research can handle up to 90% humidity like the E1 Zoom, RLC-511WA, and RLC-823A, while there is limited information on Ring cameras’ humidity tolerance.

If you live in a humid area, a Reolink camera might be the better choice due to the available information on humidity tolerance.

Camera & Lens

Here, I specifically reviewed the field of view, resolution, lens type, and image sensors of Ring and Reolink to give a clearer view of what they offer.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink cameras offer higher resolutions, and motorized lenses which improve image quality, and increase flexibility in security camera systems. 

Field of View

A wider field of view allows for greater coverage of the area you're monitoring.

Ring cameras offer a range of 110 to 160 degrees in the horizontal direction and 57 to 150 degrees in the vertical direction. 

Reolink cameras have a more diverse range, with the E1 Zoom having a smaller field of view due to its motorized lens, while the Duo 4G, offers a significantly wider field of view at 180 degrees.

Resolution

Most Ring cameras offer a resolution of 1080p, with the exception of the Ring Pro 2 which has a 1536 x 1536 resolution. 

Reolink, on the other hand, offers cameras with various resolutions such as the 1080p Argus Eco, 4MP Argus 3 Pro, and the higher resolution 4K RLC-830A model.

Lens Type

Both brands offer fixed-focus lenses that don't require adjustments, such as the Ring Video Doorbell Pro and Reolink Argus 2E. 

Reolink, however, has models like the RLC-823A 16X and RLC-833A that feature motorized lenses. Motorized lenses allow for more control over the focus and zoom capability.

Image Sensors

Both Ring and Reolink use CMOS sensors. Reolink has several models featuring 1/2.49″ to 1/2.7″ image sensors.

Pan, Tilt, and Zoom Capabilities

In this section, I take a look at the PT features of Ring and Reolink cameras, including their zoom capabilities.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink cameras have PTZ features and optical zoom which can zoom in on specific areas of interest and capture greater detail without pixelation or loss of clarity.

PTZ 

Most Ring cameras do not have pan, tilt, and zoom (PTZ) features, with the exception of the Stick Up Cam Plug-In.  This may be because most of their cameras are designed for specific areas, such as door entrances or indoor monitoring.

On the other hand, Reolink offers a wide array of cameras with various PTZ capabilities.  

Among their models, the E1 Zoom, RLC-823A 16X, and RLC-523WA are great examples. These cameras provide substantial pan and tilt angles, and some even include presets and advanced tracking capabilities.

Optical Zoom Features

Optical zoom provides better image quality when zoomed in compared to digital zoom, which could be essential for those who require clear image details for security reasons.

Ring cameras generally offer digital zoom but lack optical zoom options. In contrast, Reolink has a range of models that do include optical zoom, such as the RLC-823A 16X and the RLC-511WA, with magnifications from 3x to 16x. 

Camera Models Included in Research

Sources

https://ring.com/

https://reolink.com/

The post Ring vs Reolink: An In-depth Analysis appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

This article compares the best models from these two brands based on all the most important features. We will compare resolution and field of view, power & installation options, night vision, motion detection & audio, and footage storage and streaming, to help you pick the one that's best for you.

Bullet Camera Head to Head

9.5

Lorex 4K Bullet Camera

Winner4X Optical Zoom

View Price

9.3

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

CMOS Image Sensor

View Price

Dome Camera Head to Head

9.6

Lorex PTZ Dome Camera

Winner355 Degrees Viewing Angle

View Price

9.4

Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera

4MP WDR

View Price

Turret Camera Head to Head

9.4

Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera

Winner4MP Resolution

View Price

9.3

Lorex 8MP Turret Camera

113° Field of View

View Price

PTZ Camera Head to Head

9.4

Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera

WinnerObject Counting technology

View Price

9.2

Lorex PTZ IP Camera

12× Optical Zoom

View Price

Today’s security cameras come with a bunch of advanced features. Most of them have night vision, motion detection, video streaming, face recognition, and other great features.

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

Score: 9.3

View Price

Lorex 4K Bullet Camera

Score: 9.5

View Price

Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Lorex PTZ Dome Camera

Score: 9.6

View Price

Resolution and Field of View

9.3

9.2

The Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera can record at a 4 MP (2688 × 1520) resolution and covers 98 Feet.

Similarly, the Lorex PTZ Dome Camera can capture 4MP resolution videos. This model comes with ClearNight imaging technology.

Power & Installation Options

9.4

9.3

Both the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera (1.1 pounds) and the Lorex PTZ Dome Camera (4.69 pounds) are very lightweight and easy to install.

They require only one PoE (Power over Ethernet) cable for power and data transfer. The Lorex PTZ Dome Camera needs only one 100′ Cat5e Ethernet Cable, which is included in the package.

Night Vision, Motion Detection & Audio

9.4

9.2

The Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera has a 100 Feet range at night. Multiple IR LEDs and IR cut filter with auto-switch allow it to capture sharp videos when it’s dark.

On the other hand, the Lorex PTZ Network Dome comes with Color Night Vision (CNV) and ClearNight imaging technology for capturing clear videos in low-light conditions.

Footage Storage and Streaming

9.3

9.3

Footage storage and streaming is a serious concern for security cameras.

The Lorex PTZ Dome Camera only works with NVR, whereas the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera only supports SD card (128GB), and SDHC/SDXC cards.

Technical Comparison

	Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera	Lorex PTZ Dome Camera
Internal Storage	128 GB micro SD	Supports only NVR.
Night Vision Range	100 Feet	N/A
Video Resolution	4MP (2688 × 1520)	4MP
Alert type	Motion Detection, device tampering, and dynamic analysis	Built-in Motion Detection
Mounting Type	Wall mount	Wall Mount, Ceiling Mount
Item Dimensions	4.37 x 4.37 x 3.23 inches	14.4 x 7.1 x 7 inches
Free Cloud Storage	N/A	N/A
Image Sensor	CMOS Image Sensor	4MP Image Sensor

The Verdict: Hikvision vs Lorex

The Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera is undoubtedly the best dome security camera. The Lorex PTZ Dome Camera lags behind Hikvision in terms of ease of setup, advanced video detection features, and storage.

Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Lorex PTZ Dome Camera

Score: 9.6

View Price

9.4

Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera

4MP WDR

Model(s): DS-2CD2142FWD-I

The Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera can operate perfectly in -30 °C ~ 60 °C temperatures. This is possible because it is housed with IP66 weather-proof protection. It can record Full HD1080p videos. Its 120dB Wide Dynamic Range and 3D Digital Noise Reduction technology enable it to capture every small detail.

It can cover a 100 feet range. You can adjust the saturation, rotation mode, contrast, and brightness of this camera by using desktop software.

View Price
On Amazon.com

9.6

Lorex PTZ Dome Camera

355 Degrees Viewing Angle

vs

Model(s): LNZ44P4BW

The Lorex PTZ Dome Camera is an ideal DIY camera. It comes with a mounting kit and a quick setup guide for easy installation. It can record videos at a 4MP resolution.

Furthermore, this camera comes with a 355 degrees viewing angle, and 90 degrees pan & tilt, also Color Night Vision (CNV) technology.

View Price
On Lorex.com

Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Lorex 8MP Turret Camera

Score: 9.3

View Price

Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Lorex PTZ IP Camera

Score: 9.2

View Price

The post Comparing Hikvision vs Lorex: An In-Depth Analysis of 2024 Security Camera Solutions appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

From resolution, design, field of view, powering options, smart integration, and more, let’s see how their home security systems compare. By the end of this article, you’ll be able to decide for yourself whether you prefer Arlo vs Nest.

Factors To Consider When Buying A Home Surveillance System

• Alerts – Ensure your choice of camera system sends instant push notifications to your phone (and email) whenever an event is detected.
• Cloud Recording – Cloud storage ensures that you can access your recorded video from any location using your smartphone. It is available either as a freebie or for a monthly fee.
• Smart Integration – A smart home monitoring system is crucial for a smarter home. Check whether the camera system is compatible with Alexa, Google Assistant, and SmartThings, Apple Homekit, or any of your other preferred home automation systems.

Other factors worth considering are motion detection, field of view, resolution, power options, two-way audio, scheduling, and more.

Arlo Ultra

Score: 9.1

View Price

Nest Cam Outdoor Security C…

Score: 8.3

View Price

Outdoor Security Camera Head to Head

Outdoor Security Camera – Arlo Ultra vs Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

9.1

Arlo Ultra

Built-in Spotlight

Model(s): Arlo Ultra

The Arlo Ultra is a wide-angle outdoor security camera. With a 180 degrees field of view and 4K UHD video day resolution, images are both clean and detailed. Plus, you can monitor a wide area using just one camera. It also has an optional color night vision for easier recognition of intruders at night.

The Arlo Ultra camera has a built-in siren and spotlight. The siren rings every time your system is triggered or you can activate it remotely using your smartphone app. On the other hand, the spotlight automatically illuminates whenever the camera senses motion.

There is a two-way audio feature for two-way communication with the person on the other side. Plus, the Arlo Ultra security camera also works with Apple Homekit and Alexa.

Pros

• Built-in siren and spotlight helps to scare intruders away
• 4k UHD ensures top quality day video
• Wide 180 degrees viewing angle for better coverage

Cons

• Some users complained that activity zones were not accurate
• The battery life could have been longer
• Only one charging cable is provided regardless of the number of cameras

View Price

8.3

Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

24/7 Live Video

vs

Model(s): Nest Cam

The Nest Camera is a DIY camera that has a fairly wide 130 degrees field of view. It is weatherproof and is ideal for both indoor and outdoor use. Day vision is great since the camera has a 1080p HD day video resolution. And the infrared rays ensure night images are clean and clear too.

What’s more, the two-way audio lets you listen and communicate with the person outside. Notifications are sent to your phone immediately movement is detected. Plus, you no longer have to worry about replacing your batteries since the camera uses AC power.

The camera even has continuous monitoring to ensure no important detail is missed out.

Pros

• 8 infrared LEDs ensure clear night vision
• Optional continuous recording for complete surveillance
• Optional person identification

Cons

• Requires Nest Aware subscription to enjoy all the features
• Doesn’t support local storage of videos
• The magnetic base can make it easy for thieves to steal your camera if positioned within easy reach

View Price

Design, Resolution, & Field of View

Arlo Ultra

9.4

Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

8.9

Although both of these cameras have a white body with a black face, their shapes vary. The Nest Camera is round with a tall mounting base, on the other hand, Arlo Ultra is a square shape with a shorter mounting base.

Their video resolution is quite different too. The Arlo Ultra has an optional whopping 4k ultra high definition video resolution while the Nest Outdoor Camera features the standard 1080p HD resolution. Of course, the Arlo camera takes the trophy here. Its images are clearer and more detailed.

Arlo, once again, comes in with an extra broad viewing angle of 180 degrees. On the other hand, the Nest outdoor camera has a 130 degrees field of view. Although when compared to the Arlo Ultra’s field of view Nest’s resolution may seem too narrow, it is wider than most basic level outdoor security cameras.

Power, Installation, Storage, and Streaming

Arlo Ultra

9.2

Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

8.8

Arlo Ultra's outdoor camera is battery-operated. It can be installed almost anywhere with your network coverage.  The Nest cam on the other hand is a wired camera. It can only be installed in areas that are within a 25 meters radius from a power outlet.

The installation of both cameras is a breeze. Nest has a magnetic base and can be attached to any metal surface. However, it is best to install it with the included mounting screws to minimize the chances of the camera being stolen.

Another notable difference between these two cameras is their video storage. Arlo Ultra has a local storage option that supports up to 32GB. But the card is bought separately.

Cloud storage on both cameras requires a paid subscription. With Arlo, you can get up to 30 days cloud storage while Nest provides up to 60 days of cloud storage. The subscription also unlocks continuous recording and many more customization features. 

Night Vision, Motion & Audio Detection

Arlo Ultra

9.1

Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

8.7

Both the Arlo Ultra and Nest Outdoor cam have two-way audio and live view modes. You will receive instant alerts when an intruder or visitor walks within your camera's motion detection mode. Their movement sensing abilities are great. But, Arlo has an edge over Nest with tracking and automatic zooming features. The camera auto-zooms and tracks any person or object that enters its field of view.

The two cameras use infrared LEDs for night vision. The images are crisp. But, again, Arlo takes the lead with its enhanced night vision. It has a built-in spotlight that lights up automatically when motion is detected. This spotlight not only acts as a deterrent to trespassers but also allows better images even at night. The Arlo Ultra camera can record in either black and white or colored night vision. 

Smart Integration & Smartphone App

Arlo Ultra

8.8

Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

8.8

Both the Arlo Smartphone app and the Nest App have a straightforward user interface. Want to have real-time footage of your home? Simply use your app for live streaming.

And with the cameras’ two-way audio feature, you can use the app to talk remotely to the person standing in front of the camera. The cameras also send an alert to your phone app whenever motion is detected.

The apps also allow easy customization of your motion detection zones. You can also easily access your recorded video anytime anywhere.

The Nest Outdoor Camera works with both Alexa and Google Assistant. On the other hand, Arlo Ultra outdoor camera is compatible with Homekit and Amazon Alexa.

Technical Comparison – Arlo vs Nest

	Arlo Ultra	Nest Outdoor Cam
Video Resolution	4K and HDR	1080p
Spotlight	Yes	No
Siren	Yes	No
Field of View	180 degrees	130 degrees
Smart Integration	Homekit and Alexa	Alexa and Google Assistant
Power	Rechargeable	AC power option
Storage	Local and cloud storage	Cloud storage only
Installation	Wire-free	Wired
Warranty	1 year	2 year

The Verdict

9.1

Arlo Ultra

Built-in Spotlight

Model(s): Arlo Ultra

The Arlo Ultra is a wide-angle outdoor security camera. With a 180 degrees field of view and 4K UHD video day resolution, images are both clean and detailed. Plus, you can monitor a wide area using just one camera. It also has an optional color night vision for easier recognition of intruders at night.
The Arlo Ultra camera has a built-in siren and spotlight. The siren rings every time your system is triggered or you can activate it remotely using your smartphone app. On the other hand, the spotlight automatically illuminates whenever the camera senses motion.
There is a two-way audio feature for two-way communication with the person on the other side. Plus, the Arlo Ultra security camera also works with Apple Homekit and Alexa.

Pros

• Built-in siren and spotlight helps to scare intruders away
• 4k UHD ensures top quality day video
• Wide 180 degrees viewing angle for better coverage

Cons

• Some users complained that activity zones were not accurate
• The battery life could have been longer
• Only one charging cable is provided regardless of the number of cameras

View Price

8.3

Nest Cam Outdoor Security Camera

24/7 Live Video

vs

Model(s): Nest Cam

The Nest Camera is a DIY camera that has a fairly wide 130 degrees field of view. It is weatherproof and is ideal for both indoor and outdoor use. Day vision is great since the camera has a 1080p HD day video resolution. And the infrared rays ensure night images are clean and clear too.
What’s more, the two-way audio lets you listen and communicate with the person outside. Notifications are sent to your phone immediately movement is detected. Plus, you no longer have to worry about replacing your batteries since the camera uses AC power. The camera even has continuous monitoring to ensure no important detail is missed out.

Pros

• 8 infrared LEDs ensure clear night vision
• Optional continuous recording for complete surveillance
• Optional person identification

Cons

• Requires Nest Aware subscription to enjoy all the features
• Doesn’t support local storage of videos
• The magnetic base can make it easy for thieves to steal your camera if positioned within easy reach

View Price

Arlo Q

Score: 8.5

View Price

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

Score: 8.9

View Price

Indoor Camera Head to Head

Indoor Camera – Arlo Q vs Nest Cam IQ Indoor

8.5

Arlo Q

Local storage option

Model(s): VMC3040

The Arlo Q is an easy-to-install stand-alone indoor camera. You can either mount it or the wall or attach it to a metal surface using the magnetic base.

The camera also has a 1080p video resolution and a decent 130 degrees field of view. And its infrared night vision LEDs work within a range of 25 ft. to give crisp images.

Another feature worth noting is the 7-day free cloud storage. There is also an SD card for local storage of your recordings.

Pros

• Free seven-day cloud storage upgradeable to 30 days
• Arm or disarm your system based on your smartphone’s location
• Free and versatile customization of desired activity zones

Cons

• Video quality could have been better
• Complaints of occasional lag in the audio and video

View Price

8.9

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

24/7 live streaming

vs

Model(s): IQ Cam

The Nest Cam IQ has a 130 degrees field of view and a built-in 4K sensor. Its 12x digital zoom together with HDR video ensures all recordings are clean and clear.

Installation is also straightforward. And the camera has built-in motion and audio detection angles. Smart alerts are sent to your phone when your camera detects motion.

Also, the Nest camera has a microphone and speaker. However, you will need to download the Nest app to enjoy two-way communication. The app also allows you to stream the live events happening inside your home.

Pros

• Impressive 12x digital zoom of your videos
• People and familiar faces recognition
• Works with Amazon Alexa, Google Home, and Philips Hue light bulbs

Cons

• Requires a Nest Aware subscription to unlock all features
• A little pricey

View Price

Design, Resolution, and Field of View

Arlo Q

9.0

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

9.0

The Nest and Arlo indoor cameras are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have a simplistic design that blends in seamlessly with any space. And because they are meant for the indoors, the cameras are not waterproof.

Both the Nest Cam Indoor and Arlo Q have a video resolution of 1080p. This is the standard video quality for security cameras. Video images are clear and detailed. However, the Nest Cam IQ has an edge with a 4K sensor. This sensor autofocuses on objects whenever there is an event to give clearer and cleaner images.

The cameras can detect motion as far as 25 feet during the day and up to 15 feet at night. Another feature that is common to both of these cameras is the 130 degrees angle of view. The view is wide enough to provide total coverage to your home.

Power, Installation, Storage, and Streaming

Arlo Q

8.7

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

8.8

The installation process of both the Nest Cam and Arlo Q indoor cameras is straightforward. Simply plug in the provided power cables to the power source. Next, download the respective mobile App to your phone and register for an account (or login in if you already have one). With both apps, clear and easy-to-follow guidelines are provided on how to set up your camera.

The Arlo Q indoor camera comes with one week’s free cloud storage.  To get more storage space, you will need to pay a $300 annual subscription for 30 days of cloud storage.

On the other hand, the Nest Cam doesn’t have free storage space. You’ll need to purchase the Nest Aware plans for either 10 days or 30 days of cloud storage. You will need a subscription plan with both Arlo and Nest for nonstop recording. But live streaming is free and available for both cameras. The Nest Cam goes a step further and has a three hours live footage history stored on the cloud.

Night Vision, Motion Detection, & Audio

Arlo Q

8.6

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

8.9

Both the Nest Cam Indoor and the Arlo Q camera are packed with invisible infrared LEDs for enhanced video recording at night. The infrared LEDs give decent images even in low light surroundings. Arlo Q has an 850nm LED that can detect movement within a 25 feet radius.

The two cameras also have powerful built-in speakers and a mic with noise cancellation. You can hold two-way talks with your family or pets even when you’re miles away.

However, note that although the audio quality isn’t the clearest, it is audible enough. Some users of the Arlo Q camera also complained of an occasional lag when holding two-way talks.

Smart Integrations and Smartphone app

Arlo Q

9.0

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

9.4

If you want to enjoy convenient, hands-free, and remote control of your indoor home monitoring camera, go for one that offers versatile smart integration options. And these indoor cameras do not disappoint.

Both the Arlo Q and Nest Cam indoor camera gives a free smartphone app for iOS and Android users. The app allows remote control of your cameras. Use your app to set up motion zones, live feed, two-way communications, and more. The Nest app takes top position compared to Arlo App. It is easier to set up. Plus, it can differentiate people from other objects.

The Nest Cam takes lead when it comes to third-party integrations. Unlike the Arlo Q camera that only works with Amazon Alexa, it is also compatible with SmartThings, Google Assistant, and IFTTT.

Technical Comparison – Arlo vs Nest

	Arlo Q	Nest Indoor Cam
Video Resolution	1080p HD	1080p HD
Smart Integration	Amazon Alexa and Ring App	Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, SmartThings, and Nest App
Field of View	130 degrees	130 degrees
Cloud storage	7 days of free cloud recording	Requires a subscription
Night Vision	Infrared LEDs	Infrared LEDs
Power	Wired to AC	Wired to AC
Audio	Two-way recording and speaker	Two-way recording and speaker
Geo-fencing	Yes	Yes
Dimensions	2.75 x 2.80 x 4.50 inches	4.9 x 2.9 x 2.9 inches
Continuous Recording	Yes	Yes

The Verdict

8.5

Arlo Q

Local storage option

Model(s): VMC3040

The Arlo Q is an easy-to-install stand-alone indoor camera. You can either mount it or the wall or attach it to a metal surface using the magnetic base.
The camera also has a 1080p video resolution and a decent 130 degrees field of view. And its infrared night vision LEDs work within a range of 25 ft. to give crisp images.
Another feature worth noting is the 7-day free cloud storage. There is also an SD card for local storage of your recordings.

Pros

• Free seven-day cloud storage upgradeable to 30 days
• Arm or disarm your system based on your smartphone’s location
• Free and versatile customization of desired activity zones

Cons

• Video quality could have been better
• Complaints of occasional lag in the audio and video

View Price

8.9

Nest Cam IQ Indoor

24/7 live streaming

vs

Model(s): IQ Cam

The Nest Cam IQ has a 130 degrees field of view and a built-in 4K sensor. Its 12x digital zoom together with HDR video ensures all recordings are clean and clear.
Installation is also straightforward. And the camera has built-in motion and audio detection angles. Smart alerts are sent to your phone when your camera detects motion.
Also, the Nest camera has a microphone and speaker. However, you will need to download the Nest app to enjoy two-way communication. The app also allows you to stream the live events happening inside your home.

Pros

• Impressive 12x digital zoom of your videos
• People and familiar faces recognition
• Works with Amazon Alexa, Google Home, and Philips Hue light bulbs

Cons

• Requires a Nest Aware subscription to unlock all features
• A little pricey

View Price

Arlo Video Doorbell

Score: 8.5

View Price

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

Score: 8.6

View Price

Video Doorbell Head to Head

Video Doorbell – Arlo Video Doorbell vs Nest Hello Video Doorbell

8.5

Arlo Video Doorbell

Visitors can leave a message for you

Model(s): Arlo Video Doorbell

The Arlo Smart Video Doorbell has a wide-angle view of 180 degrees and a 1:1 display ratio that ensures total coverage of the events happening at your doorstep. It is a wired video doorbell that needs to be connected to your previous doorbell wiring to operate.

What’s more, the Arlo Smart Video Doorbell has a built-in siren. The siren is a great addition and can be used to deter unwanted guests. Plus, the Arlo Smart Plan subscription unlocks AI features such as a person, object, and animal recognition, cloud storage of up to 30 days, and more.

Pros

• Built-in siren to deter intruders
• Convenient “away” messages notify your visitors that no one is home
• Sleek and compact design

Cons

• Only works best when paired with an Arlo security system
• The doorbell is wired and its installation may be time-consuming

View Price

8.6

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

24/7 live streaming

vs

Model(s): Nest Hello Video Doorbell

Packed with a quick reply feature, built-in camera, and silent time setting, the Nest Hello Video Doorbell has all the key features necessary in a doorbell. It is sleek and has a premium finish. Plus, the mic and built-in speaker allow two-way communication with the guest at your door.

You can expand your doorbell’s capabilities by subscribing to the Nest Aware plan. This activates a facial detection feature that remembers familiar faces. Plus, a person recognition setting helps to minimize false alerts that may be caused by passing vehicles.

Pros

• 4.3 HD video resolution for top quality images
• Amazing night vision ability for low light viewing
• Facial recognition feature to remember familiar faces

Cons

• Storage space can be used up quickly

View Price

Design, Resolution, and Field of View

Arlo Video Doorbell

8.5

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

8.5

Both the Arlo and Nest Hello video doorbell easily replaces your existing doorbell. Installation is easy and doesn’t take much of your time. However, if you are installing a new connection, you may require help from a professional electrician.

None of the two options come with free cloud storage or a local storage option. You will need to subscribe to the Nest aware Plan for Nest and Arlo Smart plan to access cloud storage.

The Arlo Video doorbell includes a free three month Arlo Smart Subscription. After that, you’ll have to pay a monthly subscription for 30 days of cloud storage.

Both video doorbells support live streaming. Alerts are sent to your phone immediately when an event is detected. However, the Arlo video doorbell notifies you by calling your mobile phone. This is a great feature to ensure you miss no notification. But on the flip side, some lag is experienced between picking the call and switching to live streaming mode.

NigPower, Installation, Storage, and Streaming

Arlo Video Doorbell

8.3

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

8.7

Both the Arlo and Nest Hello video doorbell easily replaces your existing doorbell. Installation is easy and doesn’t take much of your time. However, if you are installing a new connection, you may require help from a professional electrician.

None of the two options come with free cloud storage or a local storage option. You will need to subscribe to the Nest aware Plan for Nest and Arlo Smart plan to access cloud storage.

The Arlo Video doorbell includes a free three month Arlo Smart Subscription. After that, you’ll have to pay a monthly subscription for 30 days of cloud storage.

Both video doorbells support live streaming. Alerts are sent to your phone immediately when an event is detected. However, the Arlo video doorbell notifies you by calling your mobile phone. This is a great feature to ensure you miss no notification. But on the flip side, some lag is experienced between picking the call and switching to live streaming mode.

Night Vision, Motion Detection, & Audio

Arlo Video Doorbell

8.7

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

8.7

When shopping for a video doorbell, an important factor that you need to consider is night vision. Intruders love the dark. And you want a system that works well even in low light.

Both the Nest Hello and Arlo video doorbells have great night vision abilities. They use invisible infrared rays to give you a view of what’s happening even at the wee hours of the night.

Another great feature is the two-way audio. You can hold a conversation with the parcel delivery guy without having to walk downstairs. There is also a quick reply option. You can leave pre-recorded images that you can play by the press of command on your app. But, the Arlo video doorbell has an edge as it allows your visitor to leave a message.

The video doorbells also have built-in motion sensors and will notify you whenever your doorbell detects movement. Arlo has smart notifications and can differentiate cars, animals, and people. On the other hand, the Nest doorbell has facial recognition, a setting that remembers familiar faces.

Smart Integrations and Smartphone App

Arlo Video Doorbell

8.8

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

8.7

Nest Hello and Arlo Video Doorbell are both compatible with Google Home and Amazon Alexa. This allows voice control of your video doorbell and can be integrated with your other automation system.

And with the respective smartphone app, you can access and control your video doorbell remotely using your phone. By simply logging in to the Arlo App or Nest App, you can stream live footage, review recorded, set up motion zones, and more. Both of the app’s user interfaces are user friendly and easy to follow.

Technical Comparison – Arlo vs Nest

	Arlo Video Doorbell	Nest Hello Video Doorbell
Field of View	180 degrees	160 degrees
Power	Standard AC connection	Standard AC connection
Cloud Storage	Paid subscription	Paid subscription
Smart Integration	Amazon Alexa and Google Home	Amazon Alexa and Google Home
Installation	Wired	Wireless
Sensors	Motion and video	Motion and audio
Night Vision	Infrared	Infrared
Continuous recording	None	24/7
Weight	4 oz.	4.28 oz.
Dimensions	1.8 x 1 x  1.5 inches	1.7 x 4.6 x 1.0 inches

The Verdict

8.5

Arlo Video Doorbell

Visitors can leave a message for you

Model(s): Arlo Video Doorbell

The Arlo Smart Video Doorbell has a wide-angle view of 180 degrees and a 1:1 display ratio that ensures total coverage of the events happening at your doorstep. It is a wired video doorbell that needs to be connected to your previous doorbell wiring to operate.
What’s more, the Arlo Smart Video Doorbell has a built-in siren. The siren is a great addition and can be used to deter unwanted guests. Plus, the Arlo Smart Plan subscription unlocks AI features such as a person, object, and animal recognition, cloud storage of up to 30 days, and more.

Pros

• Built-in siren to deter intruders
• Convenient “away” messages notify your visitors that no one is home
• Sleek and compact design

Cons

• Only works best when paired with an Arlo security system
• The doorbell is wired and its installation may be time-consuming

View Price

8.6

Nest Hello Video Doorbell

24/7 live streaming

vs

Model(s): Nest Hello Video Doorbell

Packed with a quick reply feature, built-in camera, and silent time setting, the Nest Hello Video Doorbell has all the key features necessary in a doorbell. It is sleek and has a premium finish. Plus, the mic and built-in speaker allow two-way communication with the guest at your door.
You can expand your doorbell’s capabilities by subscribing to the Nest Aware plan. This activates a facial detection feature that remembers familiar faces. Plus, a person recognition setting helps to minimize false alerts that may be caused by passing vehicles.

Pros

• 4.3 HD video resolution for top quality images
• Amazing night vision ability for low light viewing
• Facial recognition feature to remember familiar faces

Cons

• Storage space can be used up quickly

View Price

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

Score: 8.6

View Price

Nest Secure Alarm System St…

Score: 8.6

View Price

Kit & Protection Plans Head to Head

Kit & Protection Plans – Arlo Smart Home Security Kit vs Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

8.6

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

Weatherproof system

Model(s): Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

The Arlo Smart Home Security Kit comes with an Arlo Pro Camera, Doorbell, and Chime. The three work together to ensure no event is left unnoticed. The Pro camera has HD video resolution and it is wireless.

If you are away from home, the audio doorbell will notify you whenever there is someone outside the door, the camera takes a video of the guest.
The Arlo chime, on the other hand, comes in handy when you are running errands inside your house to ensure no notification is left unattended.

Pros

• Weatherproof and works all year round
• A wire-free system that is easy to install
• You can answer your door from any location using your smartphone

Cons

• Battery life could have been longer
• Slight lag during two-way communication

View Price

8.6

Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

Versatile customization options

vs

Model(s): Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

The Nest Alarm System comprises one Nest Guard, two Nest Detect Sensors, one Quick Start Card, and 2 Nest Tags.

You’ll receive notifications in case you forget to arm your system. And you can either arm your system remotely using your phone, enter your password on the keypad or tap your Tag on the Nest guard. What’s more, the alarm system works with both Alexa and Google Home.

Pros

• Easy DIY installation
• Compatible with Google Assistant for ultimate home automation
• Optional professional monitoring

Cons

• Alerts could have been louder
• Lacks a history lag option to know who armed or disarmed it and when they did so

View Price

Design, Resolution, and Field of View

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

8.5

Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

8.5

The Arlo Smart Home Security Kit comprises the Arlo Pro Camera, Doorbell, and chime. The Arlo Pro camera has a 110 degrees viewing angle, HD video, and is waterproof. Its video resolution is 1280 x 720. There is also an audio doorbell that lets you know when someone is at the door and the chime announces when someone rings the doorbell.

On the other hand, the Nest Smart Alarm system has a Nest Tag, Nest Detect, and Nest Guard. The Nest Guard comprises an alarm, motion sensors, and keypad. The Nest Tag is a personal key. Use the tag to arm or disarm the system without entering a password. And the Nest Detects has window (or door) sensors for added monitoring.

Both of these systems are well made and durable. All the components are white and will blend in easily with any home.

Power, Installation, Storage, and Streaming

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

8.7

Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

8.4

Both the Arlo and Nest protection kits are wireless. They are powered by rechargeable batteries and can be set up almost anywhere within your house. Installation is DIY. You only need a few minutes to complete their installation.

The Arlo protection kit comes with 7-day free cloud storage. When your camera system detects motion, push alerts are sent instantly to your phone and you can check your camera footage to see what is happening.

On the other hand, the Nest alarm system doesn’t include any camera. You’re only notified when a door or window is opened after which you can call the police or engage the alarm.

Night Vision, Motion Detection, & Audio

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

8.6

Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

8.6

The Arlo system has built-in motion and audio sensors that detect whenever someone or something approaches your door. The Arlo camera has invisible infrared LEDs for clear images even at night.

The Nest system, on the other hand, has motion sensors that can detect motion within a 10 feet radius and have a 90 degrees field of view. An 85dB siren comes in handy when your system is triggered. And the Nest detectors even have a magnet and tamper detectors.

Smart Integrations and Smartphone App

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

8.8

Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

8.9

Both of these home protection kits are compatible with Alexa. You can control either system by simply using your voice via select Alexa-enabled devices. The two systems also work with Google assistant.Plus, you can use your smartphone to control your system remotely. The app works with both Android and Alexa. Unlike most other alarm systems, the Nest alarm allows you to customize the delay duration. Thus, you don’t have to worry about frequent false alarms.           

Technical Comparison – Arlo vs Nest

	Arlo Smart Home Security Kit	Nest Alarm System Starter Pack
Field of View	110 degrees	N/A
Power	Rechargeable battery	Rechargeable battery
Cloud Storage	Free 7 day cloud storage	N/A
Smart Integration	Amazon Alexa and Google Home	Amazon Alexa and Google Home
Installation	Easy DIY wall mount	Easy DIY wall mount
Sensors	Motion, audio, and video	Motion and audio
Night Vision	Infrared	Infrared
Color	White	White

The Verdict

8.6

Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

Weatherproof system

Model(s): Arlo Smart Home Security Kit

The Arlo Smart Home Security Kit comes with an Arlo Pro Camera, Doorbell, and Chime. The three work together to ensure no event is left unnoticed. The Pro camera has HD video resolution and it is wireless.
If you are away from home, the audio doorbell will notify you whenever there is someone outside the door, the camera takes a video of the guest.
The Arlo chime, on the other hand, comes in handy when you are running errands inside your house to ensure no notification is left unattended.

Pros

• Weatherproof and works all year round
• A wire-free system that is easy to install
• You can answer your door from any location using your smartphone

Cons

• Battery life could have been longer
• Slight lag during two-way communication

View Price

8.6

Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

Versatile customization options

vs

Model(s): Nest Secure Alarm System Starter Pack

The Nest Alarm System comprises one Nest Guard, two Nest Detect Sensors, one Quick Start Card, and 2 Nest Tags. You’ll receive notifications in case you forget to arm your system. And you can either arm your system remotely using your phone, enter your password on the keypad or tap your Tag on the Nest guard.
What’s more, the alarm system works with both Alexa and Google Home.

Pros

• Easy DIY installation
• Compatible with Google Assistant for ultimate home automation
• Optional professional monitoring

Cons

• Alerts could have been louder
• Lacks a history lag option to know who armed or disarmed it and when they did so

View Price

Arlo vs Nest – Conclusion

Now that we have reviewed all the top products of Arlo and Nest, it’s time for the verdict. Arlo vs Nest, which is the better brand? Most Arlo security cameras are wire-free and can be installed almost anywhere. On the flipside, Nest offers 24/7 recording and includes alarm systems. The best brand depends on your needs.

Arlo vs Nest, which one do you prefer and why? Leave a comment and let us know what you think!

The post 2024 Ultimate Showdown: Arlo vs Nest – Which is the Best Smart Security Solution? appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

Amcrest 4K POE Bullet Camera

Score: 9.5

View Price

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Resolution and Field of View

In terms of Resolution and Field of View, both models are equal. The Amcrest 4K POE Bullet Camera can capture 4K (8-Megapixel)) videos at 30fps. On the other hand, the Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera does 2688 ×1520 resolution recording at 30fp.

However, they differ in the image sensor they use. The Amcrest 4K POE Bullet Camera comes with 1/1.8″ CMOS, whereas the Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera comes with 1/3″  CMOS.

Power & Installation Options

Both models are easy to set up and configure. The Amcrest 4K POE Bullet Camera (1.31 pounds) comes with a single PoE wire. To get it up and running, all you need to do is plug-in the wire.

On the flip side, the Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera supports both a PoE wire and an Ethernet connection.

Night Vision, Motion Detection & Audio

The Amcrest ProHD Indoor Camera can cover 164 feet at night. The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera falls short by covering only 100 feet. It also does not come with a separate IR LED light.

Motion alert is a common feature among all security cameras, and both of these models have it.

Footage Storage and Streaming

The Amcrest 4K POE Bullet Camera has both local and remote storage features. Moreover, it can stream its footage via the Amcrest App. You can also access its videos via Amcrest Surveillance Pro software on your windows/Mac device. 

On the contrary, the Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera offers support for 128GB microSD card, NAS, SMB/CIFS, and ANR storage.

Technical Comparison

The Verdict: Amcrest vs Hikvision

The Amcrest 4K POE Bullet Camera is the best bullet security camera. It beats its Hikvision counterpart in terms of video resolution, night vision, and storage options.

The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera came very close to beating the Amcrest model in the storage area but failed as it offered no cloud storage option.

Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera

Score: 9.3

View Price

Resolution and Field of View

The Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera offers an ultra-high quality 4K resolution. Moreover, its Dual H.265/H.246 compression allows for maximum encryption.

Whereas, the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera can record at a 4 MP (2688 × 1520) resolution.

Power & Installation Options

Both the Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera (1.4 pounds) and the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera (1.1 pounds) are very lightweight and easy to install.

These models require only one PoE (Power over Ethernet) cable for power and data transfer. You don’t have to worry about unnecessary wire clutter.

Night Vision, Motion Detection & Audio

The Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera  covers 98 Feet, whereas the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera covers 100 Feet at night.

The Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera supports multiple motion detection zones, meanwhile the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera comes with multiple IR LEDs and IR cut filter with the auto switch to capture crisp videos at night and in low light.

Footage Storage and Streaming

Like all other security cameras, these two models also come with strong local storage so that you don’t have to worry about new footage automatically erasing old ones.

The Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera  is compatible with MicroSD, Amcrest Cloud, Amcrest Surveillance Pro (PC & MAC), Amcrest NVRs, Synology & QNAP NAS, FTP, Blue Iris. Quite the opposite, the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera only supports an SD card. (128GB).

Technical Comparison

The Verdict: Amcrest vs Hikvision

The Amcrest 4K Dome POE Camera and the Hikvision 4MP Dome Camera sit very close to each other in almost all four areas. But Amcrest manages to beat its Hikvision counterpart with better motion detection, so it takes the top spot for being the best security camera.

Amcrest WiFi PTZ IP Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera

Score: 9.2

View Price

Resolution and Field of View

The Amcrest WiFi PTZ IP Camera captures videos at 1080P and 30fps. Its Sony STARVIS IMX290 image sensor and Ambarella S3LM chipset make sure it captures sharp videos too. Moreover, it has a whopping 328 feet of view sight. 

Meanwhile, the Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera can record 3MP videos.

Power & Installation Options

Both models are very easy to setup.

On your Amcrest Security Camera, you can stream recorded video using the View App. Setting up this app is very simple and takes only a few steps.

Night Vision, Motion Detection & Audio

The Amcrest WiFi PTZ IP Camera comes with Sony Starvis 1/3” progressive image sensor and built-in IR LEDs. Thanks to these advanced specs, it can cover 329 feet in front. The Amcrest WiFi Outdoor PTZ IP Camera comes with two-way- audio, whereas the Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera has 16x Digital Zoom that only takes 4.5 seconds to respond.

Footage Storage and Streaming

The Amcrest WiFi PTZ IP Camera Camera supports MicroSD Card, Amcrest NVR, Amcrest Cloud, FTP, NAS. 

The Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera supports 128GB SD Card as well as Edge Recording. It also comes with H.264 / MJPEG technology.

Technical Comparison

The Verdict: Amcrest vs Hikvision

The Amcrest WiFi PTZ IP Camera takes the winner spot. It is the best security camera in this category as it has good video resolution, versatile storage options, and great night vision.

The post Amcrest vs Hikvision: 2024 Powerhouse Showdown Security Camera Head to Head! appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

Ring has gained popularity for its user-friendly video doorbells and comprehensive surveillance solutions, while Arlo stands out with its wireless cameras and advanced customization options. 

To provide insights into selecting the brand that best suits your home security requirements, I looked into a total of 20 security cameras, including 12 from Ring and 9 from Arlo, and a detailed list of product codes can be found at the end of the article.

The Winners

Best for Simple Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Comprehensive Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Simple Security: Ring

Ring is best for simple, cloud-based security due to its easy setup, emphasis on cloud storage, and seamless integration with cloud services. 

With cloud storage, Ring cameras offer the convenience of remotely storing and accessing video footage online, ensuring that valuable recordings are protected even if the camera or local storage gets damaged. 

This provides added security and convenience for users who can easily access their footage from anywhere. While there is usually a recurring fee for cloud storage services, the benefits of remote access and added security makes it a worthwhile investment for many. 

Overall, Ring's cloud-focused approach and integration with cloud services make it an excellent choice for those seeking convenient remote access and enhanced security through cloud storage.

Best for Comprehensive Security: Arlo

Arlo is an ideal choice for those seeking comprehensive security solutions with 24/7 professional monitoring.

With optional cloud subscriptions and storage options, Arlo offers flexibility in choosing the level of cloud storage and advanced features that best suit individual needs and budgets. 

Additionally, Arlo cameras integrate with a wide range of smart home platforms, including popular ones like Apple HomeKit, Amazon Sidewalk, Chromecast, SmartThings, Google Nest Hub, and IFTTT. This extensive compatibility enables seamless integration and enhanced smart home security capabilities. 

Winners per Category

Arlo vs Ring Doorbell: Overview

Here, I specifically looked at Ring and Arlo’s camera types, cloud subscription options, wire types, color options, price range, and warranty duration. 

Camera Types 

Ring mainly provides video doorbells, floodlights, and spotlight cameras. Ring's video doorbells come in wired and wireless options, with the latter being battery-powered.

On the other hand, Arlo also offers a comprehensive selection of security cameras such as video doorbells, spotlights, floodlights, and indoor cameras. Arlo's camera models feature both wireless and wired options, with several models operating on battery power.

Cloud Subscription

Ring generally requires a mandatory subscription for its camera models to have access to cloud storage for video recordings, advanced motion detection settings, and extended warranties.

Arlo, on the other hand, offers optional cloud subscriptions for all camera models in this research.

Pricing

Both Arlo and Ring offer products in the mid-range and high-end price segments. As of the time of writing, Arlo cameras were coming in slightly more expensive than Ring. For up-to-date pricing, check out the packages above.

Warranty

The standard warranty duration for most Ring products included in this analysis is one year, with the Pro 2 offering a two-year warranty. Similarly, Arlo's standard warranty on cameras included in this research is one year.

Power & Data Feeds

In terms of power and data feeds, I analyzed both brands’ power options, data transmission processes, and data types.

Winner: Draw

Very little to set them apart here. Both offer cameras with battery, solar, AC/DC power options, and Wi-Fi. Ring has 1 PoE camera, while Arlo has a 4G camera.

Power Options 

Ring cameras mostly support DC and AC power, with some models supporting battery and solar power such as Spotlight Cam Plus Battery and Stick Up Cam Battery. The Video Doorbell Elite also runs on PoE (power-over-ethernet).

On the other hand,  Arlo models mostly support battery and AC power such as the Pro 5S 2K, Pro 4, and Ultra 2. Some cameras also support solar power such as Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi, Essential, and Pro 3. 

Data transmission 

Both Ring and Arlo support 2.4GHz Wi-Fi in nearly all their camera models, and also offer additional data transmission options in certain models. 

With Ring, the Video Doorbell Elite and Floodlight Cam Wired Pro also support 5GHz Wi-Fi and Power over Ethernet (PoE). In contrast, Arlo provides 5GHz Wi-Fi in the Pro 5S 2K and Ultra 2 models and 4G LTE support in the Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi model.

Storage & Interoperability

When analyzing the storage and smart integration functionalities of each brand, I primarily focused on its storage options and integration features. 

Winner: Arlo

Ring offers cloud storage for footage which secures your data, while Arlo provides flexibility in its storage options.

Storage 

Ring has a consistent focus on cloud storage, with all their models, including the Video Doorbell Series, Indoor Cam, Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, Spotlight Cam, and Stick Up Cam, supporting this feature exclusively. 

This means that your video footage will be stored remotely and accessible online, providing convenience and added security in case the camera or local storage gets damaged. However, it is essential to note that there is usually a recurring fee for cloud storage services, which may add to the overall cost.

On the other hand, Arlo offers more versatility when it comes to storage options. Most of their models, such as Essential Wireless, Essential Wired, Pro 3, Pro 4, and Ultra 2, support microSD, cloud, and USB flash drive storage via the wireless hub. 

This mix of local and cloud storage options provides users with more flexibility in choosing the storage method that best meets their security and budgetary needs. 

The Arlo Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi model goes one step further, including an onboard storage capacity of 2GB, which allows video recording even without an external storage device or cloud subscription.

Interoperability features

Neither of these brands plays well with external systems. If you’re looking for ONVIF, RTSP or FTP capabilities, then I recommend checking out my Reolink vs Amcrest guide.

Arlo vs Ring Doorbell: Smart Detection

In examining smart integration and intelligence features, I analyzed the smart integration capabilities and customization of motion zones and sensitivity. 

Winner: Arlo

Arlo has more models with integrations to smart assistants and platforms, provides an added email notification when detecting motions, and caters to more smart detection features as compared to Ring. 

Smart Integrations

Both Ring and Arlo cameras provide support for popular voice assistants such as Amazon, Alexa, and Google Assistant. 

However, I noticed that Arlo has a slight edge in terms of compatibility because its cameras generally integrate with a wider range of smart home platforms including Apple HomeKit, Amazon Sidewalk, Chromecast, SmartThings, Google Nest Hub, and IFTTT. 

On the other hand, Ring cameras focus mainly on Amazon devices such as Echo Show and Fire TV.

Despite being a third-party vendor, Arlo’s integration into Amazon’s ecosystem is quite extensive.

Configurable Motion Zones and Sensitivity

Ring and Arlo offer these features in most of their models, allowing you to customize your camera's motion detection capabilities according to your preferences. 

Motion Alerts and Notification

Users receive push notifications for motion alerts on both brands.

Some Arlo models like the Pro 5S 2K, Essential Wireless, Essential Indoor,  Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi and Pro 3 also provide the option for email alerts, adding an additional layer of notification flexibility.

Smart Detection Features

Although both brands offer smart motion detection features, Arlo appears to have a more extensive list of detection options. Arlo cameras can detect not only the presence of a person but also vehicles, objects, and even animals. 

Ring cameras included in this research mainly focus on person detection, with the Pro 2 offering object detection as well.

Audio

Here, I specifically looked at Ring and Arlo’s audio capabilities like integrated microphones and speakers, alarms, and sirens. 

Winner: Draw

Both brands support two-way chat and have integrated alarms.

Integrated Microphones and Speakers

Ring and Arlo cameras generally offer integrated microphones and speakers, allowing for a seamless two-way audio experience. This means users can listen to and speak with the people in front of the camera. 

An integrated microphone is a crucial feature for communicating with people on the other end, whether it's through a doorbell camera or an indoor/outdoor security camera.

Integrated siren or alarm

All models from both brands included in the research feature an integrated siren or alarm, which can alert homeowners to any potential threats and scare away intruders.

Some of the Ring models like Floodlight Cam Wired Pro and Spotlight Cam Plus Wired have sirens that can reach an impressive 110 dB of loudness, ensuring the alarm can be heard clearly.

Low Light and Full Night Vision

Here, I took into consideration the night vision capabilities of both brands focusing on types of night vision, and spotlight features. 

Winner: Draw

Both Ring and Arlo feature night vision, and spotlight features on selected models.

Night Vision Types

Both Ring and Arlo cameras offer night vision functionality, but they differ in their night vision types. 

Ring primarily uses infrared night vision, which provides good visibility in total darkness, while some Ring also offer full-color night vision via a spotlight feature with Floodlight Cam Wired Plus, Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, Spotlight Cam Plus Battery, and Spotlight Cam Plus Wired models. 

Arlo, on the other hand, tends to have infrared night vision as well, but they also provide full-color night vision via a spotlight in Pro 5S 2K, Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi, Pro 3, Essential, and Pro 4 models.

Spotlight Feature

Ring has models with powerful spotlights, like the Floodlight Cam Wired Pro, which uses two 2000-lumen spotlights.

Arlo also offers the spotlight option on several models, like the Pro 3, which features a 3000-lumen spotlight, one of the brightest in their lineup. 

Camera & Lens

Here, I've looked at the specifics of the field of view, image sensor, lens type, and resolution of camera models included in the research.

Winner: Arlo

Arlo wins this category, particularly with the Arlo Ultra 2 which has 4k resolution and a large 1/2″ image sensor.

Continuous vs Motion Activated Recording 

Continuous recording could be essential for those who want round-the-clock coverage at their property. 

A few Arlo models, such as the Essential Indoor and Ultra 2, offer continuous recording capabilities. The Ring Elite doorbell also supports it.

Contrastingly, motion-activated recording is a common feature in both brands, ensuring that the cameras only record when movement is detected. This helps in saving storage space and provides more focused surveillance.

Field of view (FOV)

This determines how much area the camera is able to capture. My research shows that Ring offers an extensive range of FOV options, with horizontal angles ranging from 110° to 160° and vertical angles from 57° to 150°.

On the other hand, Arlo provides fewer variations but offers cameras with either a broader 180° diagonal FOV or a narrower 130° diagonal FOV.      

Image Sensors & Lenses

Ring primarily uses CMOS sensors known for their great low-light performance. Certain Arlo models like the Arlo Pro 3 and Arlo Pro 4 feature a 1/3″ image sensor size, while the Arlo Ultra 2 has a bigger 1/2″ image sensor size. A larger sensor size allows the camera to capture more detail in images.

Both Ring and Arlo cameras come equipped with fixed-focus lenses, which maintain a sharp focus on objects at a specific distance. 

Resolution

As for resolution, Ring cameras offer 2MP (1080p) Full HD resolution, ensuring clear and crisp image quality. 

Arlo provides a wider range of resolutions, from 2MP (1080p) Full HD up to 8MP (4K) Ultra HD, like the Arlo Ultra 2. 

Higher-resolution cameras deliver more detail and better picture quality, which can be crucial for identifying intruders or reading license plates.

Pan-Tilt-Zoom 

Here, I scrutinized the pan, tilt, and zoom capabilities of Ring and Arlo camera models included in this research. 

Winner: Ring

Ring has one PT camera, the Ring’s Stick Up Cam Plug-In with a PT Mount.

Pan and Tilt

In terms of pan and tilt features, all models included in this research lack these features with the exception of Ring’s Stick Up Cam Plug-In, which offers a 360-degree pan angle and a 90-degree tilt angle with the add-on mount. 

Zoom Options

With regards to zoom options, neither Ring nor Arlo cameras included in this research offer optical zoom.

Camera Quality

When examining the device features of Ring and Arlo, I specifically checked the camera dimensions, build quality, and weight. 

Winner: Draw

Both Ring and Arlo provide weather-resistant cameras that suit your security needs in both indoor and outdoor spaces.

Camera Dimensions

Ring cameras tend to be more streamlined and minimalist in design, while Arlo devices can be larger and bulkier, which may impact your decision based on aesthetic preferences.

For example, Ring's Video Doorbell 4 measures 5.1 in. x 2.4 in x 1.1 in, compared to the slightly larger Arlo Pro 5S 2K at 89mm x 52mm x 78.4mm.

Build Quality

My research shows that both Ring and Arlo security cameras are generally built to withstand various weather conditions. 

They have weather-resistant exteriors and are designed to perform well in a range of temperatures – most models can operate in temperatures as low as -5°F and as high as 120°F. 

Arlo offers cameras with higher IP ratings, such as the Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi camera with an IP65 rating, indicating a higher level of protection against dust and water.

How I Tested

Resources

https://ring.com/

https://www.arlo.com/en-us/

The post Arlo vs Ring Doorbell: Ultimate Showdown of Smart Home Security Systems in 2024 appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

Join me as I explore the key features of 7 models from Blink and 29 models from Lorex! You can find the specific product codes of the cameras included at the end of this article.  

The Winners

Best for Simple Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Professional Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Simple Security: Blink

Blink offers an easy and budget-friendly installation process. With its wireless setup and reliance on cloud storage, Blink cameras eliminate the need for complex wiring and provide convenient access to recorded footage from anywhere. 

Despite their affordability, these cameras still pack advanced features such as customizable motion detection and impressive battery life, ensuring continuous surveillance coverage. 

For hassle-free and cost-effective security solutions without compromising on quality, Blink is my winner.

Best for Professional Security: Lorex

Lorex offers a variety of camera types for different uses and eliminates the need for monthly cloud subscription costs. 

Further, a majority of its cameras support third-party security systems and boast advanced motion detection and smart detection features. 

With digital WDR, higher resolution, and advanced video features, such as 3D Noise Reduction, Lorex cameras deliver clear and detailed footage even at night!

Additionally, Lorex cameras are known for their durability and weather resistance.

For reliable and high-performance security solutions, Lorex is my winner.

Winners per Category

Lorex generally has higher-grade cameras than Blink which is why they win in most categories. That's not to say that a Blink camera is not worth it, as they are ideal for simple security with no hassle.

Overview

In this overview, I compared Blink and Lorex across various attributes such as camera types, power, and data options, pricing, cloud subscription services, and standard warranty.

Camera Types

Blink offers a range of camera types, including floodlight, cube, and video doorbell models. 

In comparison, Lorex provides a wider variety of camera types, including bullet, turret, PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom), floodlight, spotlight, and video doorbell models.

Power and Data Types

Blink has a combination of wireless data and wired power security cameras, along with a wireless data and battery-powered option, while Lorex offers more variety in connectivity with models that are completely wired, wireless cameras with wired power, and a few wireless and battery-powered options.

Pricing

Both brands provide cameras at different price points to cater to various budgets. 

Blink cameras are generally more affordable, with most models falling in the budget and mid-range categories, like the Mini Pan-Tilt Camera, which is a budget-friendly option for an indoor PT camera. 

For those who prefer battery-powered cameras, Blink offers the Indoor and Outdoor 3rd Gen models, which provide wireless data and battery power. 

For floodlight cameras, Blink has the Budget Wired Floodlight Camera and the Outdoor 3rd Gen model.

In contrast, Lorex has more high-end cameras, although there are some budget and mid-range options available.

Lorex provides the LNZ44P12B, a high-end PTZ camera that can be used outdoors with wired data and power.

Cloud Subscription Services 

All Blink cameras have cloud subscription options, allowing you to store your footage remotely. 

However, Lorex cameras do not offer cloud subscription options.

Standard Warranty Offered

In terms of warranties, both Blink and Lorex offer the same 1-year standard warranty for their cameras.

Wired vs Wireless

When analyzing the power and data functionalities, I focused on the power options, data transmission techniques, and data formats supported by Blink and Lorex.

Winner: Draw

While Lorex provides a wider range of power and data transmission options, offering flexibility in setup, Blink stands out with its wireless and battery-powered design.

Power Options

Blink offers cameras with battery, solar panel, DC, and AC power options. Interestingly, most Blink models are battery-powered, with some featuring solar panel support. 

Lorex provides a variety of power options, including battery, solar panel, DC, AC, and Power over Ethernet (PoE).

Data Transmission

While comparing data transmission methods, I found that all Blink models rely on 2.4GHz WiFi for data transmission, whereas Lorex cameras offer a broader range of options, with some supporting both 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi, and others exclusively using PoE. 

Additionally, some Lorex models utilize coaxial cables for transmitting data, catering to those who prefer analog systems.

Data Type

Blink exclusively offers IP cameras while Lorex offers both IP (Internet Protocol) and analog cameras.

IP cameras transmit digital video signals over an IP network, whereas analog cameras primarily use older technology with HD analog data formats such as HD-AHD, HD-TVI, HD-CVI, and HD-CVBS.  

Storage and Third Party Compatibility

In analyzing the storage and smart integration capabilities of each brand, I put emphasis on evaluating storage capacity, the range of storage options available, and interoperability features.

Winner: Lorex

Both Blink and Lorex offer different options for storage. However, Lorex has models that support compatibility with other third-party applications.

Storage Capacity

One common feature across most Blink models is their reliance on wireless hubs and cloud storage or USB flash drives for storage. This means that Blink cameras generally do not have their own on-board storage.

Several Lorex models include on-board storage with capacities of up to 256GB using microSD cards such as the W881AAD-E, and W452ASDB-E.

Storage Options

Blink cameras are generally wireless and come with various storage options, including cloud storage and wireless hubs with USB flash drives in some models. 

In addition to microSD storage, some Lorex cameras such as the LNZ81P25, LBV2531W, and LZV2925SC, are compatible with Network Video Recorders (NVRs), Digital Video Recorders (DVRs), NAS, and FTP systems, offering diverse storage options to suit a variety of needs.

Interoperability

Blink cameras generally don’t play well with other security systems.

On the other hand, some Lorex cameras like the LNZ44P4BW, LNZ44P12B, and LNE9383  offer ONVIF, RTSP, and CGI compatibility, allowing them to work seamlessly with a range of third-party systems. 

Smart Detection

In this comparison, I assessed the smart features of Blink and Lorex cameras, with a specific focus on their smart integrations, customizable motion zones and sensitivity, motion alerts, smart motion detection capabilities, and other functionalities offered by both brands.

Winner: Draw

Both brands offer models that integrate into a variety of popular voice assistants. Blink has an edge for its configurable motion zones in all its models, while Lorex stands out for its advanced motion alerts and advanced smart detection features in some of its models.

Smart Integrations

Both brands support popular platforms such as Alexa and Google Assistant. This compatibility allows future owners to conveniently control their security systems with the help of voice commands. 

All Blink cameras in this research support Alexa, with some also supporting Fire TV and Echo Show like the Video Doorbell, while its Mini Indoor Security Camera also supports Google Assistant. 

Comparatively, Lorex cameras generally support Alexa and Google Assistant. Some models like  W461ASC-E and V261LCD-E also support Chromecast and Apple TV.

Configurable Motion Zones and Sensitivity

Both brands also offer configurable motion sensitivity, a helpful tool that allows users to adjust how easily motion triggers the cameras.

For Blink, almost all of its camera models support this feature except for the Wired Floodlight Camera. Meanwhile, a small number of Lorex cameras have this feature among the 29 models included in this research.

Motion Alerts

Push notifications are a standard feature in both brands, ensuring that users receive immediate alerts when suspicious or interesting activity occurs in their vicinity. 

Additionally, some Lorex cameras like the LNE9383, E896AB, and E893DD-E support other event-triggering options, such as video tampering, missing object, and abandoned object detection.

Smart Motion Detection Features

A crucial feature of contemporary security cameras is their ability to detect motion in specified zones which enable users to designate areas that need special attention and receive notifications when motion is detected.

In my research, I found that a majority of Blink and Lorex cameras are equipped with this capability. 

Blink's range of cameras generally comes with person detection, while Lorex cameras have a more extensive array of specialized detection options. 

Several Lorex models such as the W881AAD-E and support person detection, vehicle detection, object detection, and animal detection, with the LNZ44P12B incorporating advanced features such as heat mapping and people counting.

Two-Way Audio

When examining the audio capabilities of each brand, I considered the microphone and speaker quality, two-way audio features, siren and alarm options, and audio and alarm interface.

Winner: Draw

Blink has two-way audio communication capabilities in the majority of its models, while Lorex has models that offer integrated sirens.

Integrated Microphone, Speakers, and Two-Way Audio

The majority of cameras from both brands come with integrated microphones and speakers, which allow two-way audio communication between the camera and an external device like a smartphone. 

In particular, almost all cameras in the Blink lineup include this feature, while a large portion of Lorex models come equipped with two-way audio.

Siren and Alarm Features

When it comes to security alarm features, there are a few differences between the two brands. While the majority of Lorex models do not have integrated sirens and alarms, a healthy portion does include them. 

Blink, on the other hand, incorporates an integrated siren in one of its models, the Wired Floodlight Camera. 

The sirens found in selected models from both brands have loudness ratings of up to 105 dB for Blink and 110 dB for Lorex, making them effective deterrents against intruders.

Audio and Alarm Interface

For those considering a camera with an alarm interface, options are more limited; just one Lorex model, E881AP-W, includes such an interface. Audio interfaces, on the other hand, are generally not included in the cameras from either brand.

Footage

Here, I particularly focused on the video features of both brands, closely examining the recording capabilities, number of frame rates, video coding formats, WDR functionality, and advanced features.

Winner: Draw

Lorex offers digital WDR and advanced features such as 3D Noise Reduction, Image Rotation, and Mirror Control, but Blink generally has a higher FPS rate and privacy masking in some of its models.

Continuous Recording vs Motion-Activated Recording

Blink cameras can only support motion-activated recording as they are usually battery-powered with low storage capacity.

For Lorex, their PoE, Coax, and even some hardwired Wi-Fi cameras can support 24/7 recording while also supporting motion-activated footage. 

Maximum Supported Frame Rates

This feature ensures smoother video playback. In this research, I found out that most Blink cameras support 30 frames per second (fps). Similarly, most Lorex cameras also support 30fps, but some models have lower frame rates like 15fps.

Video Coding Format

Video coding format plays a role in determining video quality and compression efficiency. Both brands support H.264 format, which is a widely-used video compression standard. 

Many Lorex models like the W881AAD-E, W452ASDB-E, and E881AP-W  also support the more advanced H.265 format, which provides better compression efficiency and video quality compared to H.264. 

Wide Dynamic Range (WDR)

This feature helps to balance contrasting bright and dark areas within an image. It is a useful feature for outdoor cameras or cameras operating in environments with uneven lighting. 

Digital WDR appears more prominently in Lorex camera models like the LNB9242B-W, E841CD-E, and E841CA-E than in Blink cameras.

Advanced video features

In terms of advanced video features, Lorex cameras provide a wider range of options such as 3D Digital Noise Reduction (DNR), White Balance Control, Gain Control, Image Rotation Control, and Mirror Control, among others. 

The majority of Blink models included in this research offer privacy masking but don't provide as many advanced video features compared to Lorex.

Low Light and Full Night Vision

When considering the night vision capabilities of both brands, I specifically looked at the different types of night vision, spotlight functionalities, and the infrared distance offered by the cameras.

Winner: Lorex

Lorex offers models with different types of night vision and spotlight features while Blink generally has infrared night vision across its models.

Types of Night Vision

In terms of night vision functionality and type, Blink primarily focuses on infrared night vision, with its Wired Floodlight Camera and Outdoor 3rd Gen models offering full-color night vision via a spotlight. 

On the other hand, Lorex boasts models that provide infrared night vision, full-color night vision via spotlight, and even full-color night vision via low-light sensor technology. 

Spotlights

The spotlight feature is another notable difference between these two brands.

As earlier stated, among the Blink models included in this research only the Wired Floodlight Camera, and Outdoor 3rd Gen have this feature. 

On the other hand,  a more significant number of Lorex models such as E896AB, E893DD-E,E893AB-E and C883DA-Z include spotlights with varying lumen output.

This feature, combined with low-light sensor technology in some models, can significantly improve overall visibility at night.

Infrared Distance

Both brands provide a range of infrared (IR) distance options for both ambient lighting conditions and total darkness. 

Blink mostly offers cameras with infrared night vision, while Lorex expands upon this feature with full-color night vision through low-light sensor technology, which can enhance the visibility of objects and people during nighttime.

Camera Image Sensors

Here, I examined the camera and lens specifications of Blink and Lorex, focusing on features such as the field of view, lens type, and resolution of the cameras.

Winner: Lorex

Lorex provides cameras with higher resolution and motorized lenses which enable the camera to zoom in or out remotely.

Field of View

Blink offers a range of cameras with field of view (FOV) options that vary depending on the model. 

For example, their wired floodlight camera has a diagonal FOV of 143 degrees, the indoor and mini indoor security cameras offer 110 degrees, and the outdoor 3rd generation has 110 degrees as well. The video doorbell boasts a horizontal FOV of 135 degrees and a vertical FOV of 80 degrees. 

Lorex provides an even wider array of security cameras with more diverse FOV options. For instance, the LNZ44P4BW model has a motorized lens with a horizontal FOV ranging from 104 to 33 degrees, while the LNZ44P12B model has a horizontal FOV of 54 to 4 degrees.

Lens Type

Most Blink cameras are built with fixed focus lenses, which means they maintain a fixed focal length without the need for adjustments.

Lorex cameras are equipped with fixed focus lenses like Blink; however, several Lorex models such as the LNZ81P25 and E881AP-W feature motorized lenses.

Resolution

Another key distinction between the two brands is camera resolution. Blink cameras typically offer a resolution of 2MP, while Lorex offers a range of resolutions, including 2MP, 4MP, and even 8MP for crystal-clear image quality.

Image Sensors

Regarding image sensors, both brands equip their cameras with CMOS sensors to ensure high-quality image capture. While not all Blink cameras specify the size of their image sensors, Lorex often includes this information – with 1/3″, 1/2.7″, or 1/2.8″ sensors listed on various models. Larger sensors generally result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions.

Optical Zoom and PT Features

Here, I assessed the PTZ capabilities of both brands, focusing on pan, tilt, and zoom options.

Winner: Lorex

Lorex offers various PTZ cameras across its camera lineup compared to Blink.

PTZ Capabilities

PTZ features (pan, tilt, and zoom) are essential if you're looking for a security camera that can automatically cover a wide area, track subjects, or be remotely controlled. 

Pan and tilt abilities are essential for broader coverage areas, and Blink’s Mini Pan-Tilt Camera, offers a pan angle of 350° and a tilt angle of 125°, while Lorex models like LNZ44P12B, LNZ81P25, and E881AP-W feature pan angles of 360°, providing a comprehensive view of the surroundings. 

Zoom Features

Some Blink models offer digital zoom, such as the Wired Floodlight Camera and Video Doorbell. 

Conversely, Lorex has multiple models with both digital and optical zoom capabilities. Notably, models LNZ44P12B, LNZ81P25, and LZV2925SC offer 16x digital zoom, while models LNZ44P4BW and LNE9292B provide optical zoom with 4x magnification.

PTZ Camera Choices

Lorex has multiple PTZ cameras like the LNZ44P12B, LNZ81P25, and LZV2925SC, which include various tours, presets, scans, and patterns. In contrast, Blink does not have any models with PTZ features.

Camera Quality

In assessing the build quality of camera models, I focused on factors such as durability in different weather conditions, the choice of materials, and the recommended operating temperature range.

Winner: Lorex

Lorex cameras are better built and provide a wider range of operating temperatures to withstand the changing weather.

Weather Resistance 

Blink offers a weather-resistant Wired Floodlight Camera and two IP65-rated models (Outdoor 3rd Gen and Video Doorbell).

However, Lorex has a much wider range of options. They provide cameras with IP65, IP66, and IP67 ratings, thus meeting the needs of those who want a high level of protection against various weather conditions.

Build Quality

When it comes to materials, Lorex offers cameras made of metal, heavy-duty metal, aluminum alloy, polycarbonate, and aluminum.

Blink, on the other hand, focuses on using metal and plastic materials for their camera construction.

Operating Temperature

The operating temperature range is a significant consideration for users in extreme climates. 

Blink has a narrow range of temperatures, with a maximum of 95°F to 113°F and a minimum of 32°F to -4°F. 

Lorex, on the other hand, has a wider range, with a maximum of 45°F to 158°F and a minimum of -10°F to -40°F. This makes Lorex suitable for regions with more extreme temperatures.

How I Researched

Resources

https://blinkforhome.com/

https://www.lorex.com/

The post Blink vs Lorex: Battle of the Security Cameras appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

I compared them across several categories to figure out what sets them apart. I’ve listed all of the product codes at the bottom of the page. Let’s get started!

The Winners

Best for Smart Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Comprehensive Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Smart Security: Eufy

For a smart security solution, with no hidden fees, Eufy is my winner.

Firstly, Eufy doesn't charge monthly fees, providing you with a cost-effective security solution. Additionally, it offers local storage, ensuring that your data is kept securely within your own premises without relying on cloud services.

Eufy also provides an array of smart integrations and motion detection intelligence, including features like facial recognition. 

One of Eufy’s key advantages is its RTSP (Real-Time Streaming Protocol) support, which allows for greater flexibility in terms of video streaming and integration with third-party systems. This means that you have more options for customizing and expanding your security setup, integrating it with other devices or software that support RTSP.

Best for Comprehensive Security: Arlo

If you prefer 24/7 external professional monitoring, cloud storage and features, and cameras with smart integrations and motion detection intelligence, Arlo is a good choice. However, it is worth noting that these services do come with a monthly subscription cost.

With their cloud storage, your footage is securely stored and accessible from anywhere, eliminating the risk of losing crucial evidence. This allows you to review recordings, check live feeds, and share footage with ease.

Their cameras also feature advanced motion detection capabilities, like intelligent motion detection and facial recognition.

Winners per Category

Summary

To kick off, I examined the different fundamentals of the camera models, with a particular focus on the camera types, power and data transmission, pricing, cloud subscription services, and warranty duration provided by the two brands.

Camera Types

Eufy offers a variety of camera types, including wall lights, bullet, freestanding, PT, floodlight, video doorbell, and spotlight cameras. 

Arlo, on the other hand, provides cameras in the spotlight, video doorbell, bullet, and floodlight categories.

Power and Data Types

Both the Eufy and Arlo camera models in this research have wireless data with either wired power or battery power options.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, both brands offer cameras from budget to high-end price ranges.

Some notable models from Eufy include the Solo IndoorCam C24, a freestanding camera with wireless data and wired power offered in the mid-range price category at $39.99.  In the high-end tier, the Eufy Floodlight Cam 2 Pro is an impressive floodlight camera using wireless data and wired power at a price of $299.99.

As for Arlo, the Pro 4 Spotlight camera has wireless data and battery power at a price of $179.99 in the mid-range category, and the Arlo Essential Spotlight camera at $99.99, targeting budget-conscious consumers.

Cloud Subscription Services 

Eufy and Arlo both offer optional cloud subscriptions on a monthly contract basis. However Arlo's cloud plan is much more expansive, and some camera features are limited without it.

Standard Warranty Offered

Both brands provide a standard 1-year warranty for all of the camera models included in this research, which ensures that you have manufacturer support in case of any defects or issues. 

Power & Data Options

Here, I specifically looked at the power options, data transmission techniques, and data formats of Eufy and Arlo.

Winner: Arlo

Eufy focuses primarily on 2.4GHz WiFi connection while Arlo provides more versatility in terms of data transmission with both 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi, and even 4G LTE options.

Power Options

Eufy security cameras offer a variety of power options, including AC power, DC power, and battery power, with some models even being solar panel-compatible. For example, the Eufy 4G Starlight and SoloCam S40 can be powered by a solar panel or a battery. 

On the other hand, Arlo cameras also support a mix of power options, such as battery, AC power, and solar panel compatibility, like the Arlo Pro 3 and Essential models.

Data Transmission

When it comes to data transmission, most Eufy cameras use a 2.4GHz WiFi connection, like the Solo IndoorCam C24 and eufyCam 2 Pro. 

There's also a Eufy 4G Starlight model that uses a 4G LTE connection for remote areas without traditional WiFi.

In contrast, Arlo models support a wider range of data transmission methods. Most Arlo cameras use a 2.4GHz WiFi connection, but some high-end models like the Pro 5S 2K and Ultra 2 also offer a 5GHz WiFi connection. 

Additionally, the Arlo Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi is equipped with both a 2.4GHz WiFi and a 4G LTE connection, making it a versatile choice for various environments.

Data Type

Both Eufy and Arlo security camera systems use IP (Internet Protocol) data types, which means they can send and receive data over the internet. This enables the devices to offer features like live streaming, remote access, and real-time alerts.

Storage and Third-Party Compatibility

When examining the storage and smart integration capabilities of each brand, I focused on storage capacity, available storage choices, and interoperability functions.

Winner: Eufy

Eufy stands out for its support of RTSP, which Arlo does not.

Storage Capacity

Many Eufy models, such as Solo IndoorCam C24, Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X, Solo OutdoorCam C24, and Solo OutdoorCam C22, come with a storage capacity of up to 128 GB.

Storage Options

In terms of storage options, Eufy cameras provide a mix of eMMC, microSD, NAS, wireless hub, and cloud storage capabilities. For example, the S100 and 4G Starlight support eMMC only while Solo IndoorCam C24 and Solo OutdoorCam C24 support a combination of microSD, NAS, and cloud storage.

On the other hand, Arlo cameras tend to have more diverse storage options. For instance, the Arlo Pro 5S 2K, Essential Wireless, Essential Wired, Pro 3, Essential, Pro 4, and Ultra 2 models all support microSD, Cloud, and USB flash drive storage. 

Interoperability

Certain Eufy models, such as Solo IndoorCam C24, Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X, Solo OutdoorCam C24, and Solo OutdoorCam C22, support RTSP or Real-Time Streaming Protocol. 

This protocol allows users to connect their cameras to third-party systems and applications, offering greater flexibility and customization.

Arlo models, on the other hand, have not specified support for any specific interoperability protocols in the research data.

If you're looking for cameras with ONVIF compatibility, then check out my list here.

Smart Detection

Here, I contrasted the intelligence features of Eufy and Arlo cameras. I particularly examined its smart integrations, customizable motion zones and sensitivity, motion alerts, smart motion detection capabilities, and supplementary features provided by both brands.

Winner: Arlo

Eufy has broader compatibility with different voice assistants, while Arlo supports a wider range of smart home ecosystems, more diverse smart detections, and additional alert methods.

Smart Integrations

Eufy stands out for its smart integrations, as all models are compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant, with some even working with Apple HomeKit like the eufyCam 2C Pro. 

Similarly, Arlo offers a multitude of smart integrations. Almost all models in the research work with multiple platforms, including Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple HomeKit, SmartThings, and IFTTT. This increases their compatibility with other smart devices and systems. 

Configurable Motion Zones and Sensitivity

Both Eufy and Arlo cameras offer configurable motion zones and sensitivity settings, which are important features for minimizing false alerts and improving overall security.

Motion Alerts

In terms of alerts, Arlo has an edge as their cameras offer push notifications as well as email alerts. In contrast, Eufy cameras only provide push notifications. This may be an essential factor for those who prefer multiple channels for receiving alerts about potential security concerns.

Smart Motion Detection Features

Most Eufy cameras have person detection, while some also include animal detection, sound detection, or face detection like the Solo IndoorCam C24, eufyCam 2 Pro, and Solo OutdoorCam C22.

Arlo cameras offer more diverse motion detection features, with most models including person, vehicle, and object detection, with the Essential Wireless, Essential Indoor, and Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi also having animal detection.

Microphones and Speakers

In assessing the audio capabilities of each brand, I specifically looked at the microphone and speaker performance, two-way audio functionality, siren, and alarm options, and the overall audio and alarm interface.

Winner: Arlo

Arlo generally has more models equipped with integrated siren alarms compared to Eufy.

Integrated Microphone, Speakers, and Two-Way Audio

Both Eufy and Arlo have models with a built-in microphone, and speaker, with two-way audio capabilities. Two-way audio allows homeowners to communicate with the person on the other side of the camera. 

Siren and Alarm Features

This feature is helpful in scaring off intruders and alerting neighbors about any security breach. 

Several Eufy models have integrated sirens such as the Eufy S100, Floodlight Cam 2 Pro, and eufyCam 2 Pro with decibel levels ranging from 90 to 105 decibels, which indicates a fairly loud alarm.

Contrastingly, all of the nine Arlo models in this analysis also have integrated alarm features.

Video Specs

In terms of the video features of Eufy and Arlo, I closely looked at each brand’s recording capabilities, video quality, video coding format, WDR functionality, and distinctive features.

Winner: Draw

Both Eufy and Arlo offer cameras with unique features geared toward different consumer needs.

Continuous Recording vs Motion-Activated Recording

In terms of continuous recording, most Eufy security cameras do not support continuous recording. However, there are some exceptions, such as the Solo IndoorCam C24, Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X, Solo OutdoorCam C24, and Solo OutdoorCam C22.

The same is true with most Arlo cameras, with the exception of the Essential Indoor model and the Ultra 2 model. 

It's clear that continuous recording is not a standard feature for either brand, but both offer select models with this capability.

With regard to motion-activated recording, Both Eufy and Arlo have cameras that support this feature in which the recording only starts when activity is detected. This conserves storage space and battery life.

Video Quality

Eufy cameras' max supported frame rates range from 15 to 17 frames per second (FPS), with specific models like the S100, Floodlight Cam 2, and eufyCam 2C Pro boasting a 15 FPS rate, while the SoloCam S40 reaches 17 FPS. Data for Arlo cameras are not provided in this regard, but a higher FPS is generally desirable for smoother video.

Video Coding Format

Video codecs provide efficient compression without sacrificing video quality. Both Eufy and Arlo support H.265 and H.264 video compression formats, which are best known for their high compression efficiency. 

Eufy models with these formats include the Solo IndoorCam C24, Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X, eufyCam 2 Pro, and eufyCam 2. For Arlo, the Pro 5S 2K, Essential Indoor, Pro 3, and Pro 4 models also utilize these video coding formats.

Wide Dynamic Range (WDR)

WDR allows cameras to capture details in both high and low-lit situations, offering balanced exposures and improved video quality.

Eufy models with digital WDR/HDR include the Video Doorbell 2K (Battery), Solo IndoorCam C24, and Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X. In comparison, the Arlo models with digital WDR/HDR include the Pro 5S 2K, Pro 3, and Ultra 2.

Night Vision

Here, I take into consideration the night vision capabilities of both brands focusing on types of night vision, and spotlight features.

Winner: Draw

Both brands offer night vision functionalities, with models also offering spotlights for illumination.

Types of Night Vision

Most Eufy and Arlo cameras offer infrared night vision features. However, some Eufy models, such as the Solo OutdoorCam C24 and the SoloCam S40, provide full-color night vision via Spotlight in addition to infrared.

The Arlo Pro 3, Pro 4, and the Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi models provide full-color night vision using a spotlight. This means that these cameras provide clearer and more detailed images at night than those with only infrared night vision.

Spotlights

Eufy cameras such as the S100, 4G Starlight, Floodlight Cam 2 Pro, and Floodlight Cam 2 come with spotlight features with the Floodlight Cam 2 Pro standing out with a powerful 3000 lumens, allowing for an excellent range of illumination.

Meanwhile, Arlo cameras like the Pro 5S 2K, Go 2 LTE/Wi-Fi, and Pro 3 also offer this feature.

Camera Lens Specs

When examining the camera and lens features of both brands, I specifically looked at various factors such as field of view, lens type, and resolution of camera models included in the research.

Winner: Arlo

Arlo offers a wider FOV and higher resolution across all camera models.

Field of View

Eufy cameras generally have FOVs ranging from 105 degrees to 160 degrees, with the Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X boasting a 360 degrees horizontal FOV.

On the other hand, Arlo’s FOV measurements are more varied than Eufy, with the minimum being 130 degrees and the maximum extending to 180 degrees. 

Wider angles mean the camera can capture more in a single frame which is important for outdoor or large indoor areas. This makes Arlo cameras suitable for covering wide areas and perfect for outdoor surveillance.

Resolution

Eufy models have resolution options that go from 2MP (1920×1080) to 5MP (2592×1944), with most models offering 2K resolution (2304×1296 or 2560×1920). 

As for Arlo, their camera models have a wider range of resolutions from HD (1536×1536) to 4K (3840×2160). This means that if you are in need of higher-resolution security footage, Arlo might be the ideal choice for you.

Pan & Tilt Capabilities

Here, I analyzed the pan, tilt, and optical zoom capabilities, and the camera options of Eufy and Arlo that has PTZ features.

Winner: Eufy

Eufy has more camera models offering PT features.

PTZ Capabilities

If you're looking for cameras with PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom) features, you'll find more options within the Eufy lineup. For example, Eufy's Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X offers a 360-degree pan feature and 96-degree tilt capability. The Floodlight Cam 2 Pro also comes with a 360-degree pan and 130-degree tilt functions. On the other hand, Arlo doesn't provide any PTZ cameras. 

Zoom Features

Regarding optical zoom, which often provides a higher-quality image and allows you to see more details when zooming in, neither Eufy nor Arlo offers this feature in the cameras in this research.

Camera Quality

In terms of device characteristics and durability of Eufy and Arlo cameras, I conducted a thorough analysis of factors such as size, weight, resistance to various weather conditions, and recommended operating temperature range.

Winner: Draw

Eufy and Arlo both have models that are weather-resistant and share the same operating temperature ranges.

Dimensions and Weight

Among the Eufy camera models listed, the smallest camera is the Eufy Solo IndoorCam C24, measuring 2.17 x 2.17 x 4.09 inches. On the other hand, the largest camera is the Eufy Floodlight Cam 2, with dimensions of 17.7 x 10.4 x 8.2 inches.

For Arlo cameras, the smallest camera is the Arlo Essential Indoor, which measures 2.0 x 1.9 x 4.5 inches. The biggest camera among the Arlo models listed is the Arlo Pro 3, with dimensions of 218.52 x 190.5 x 77.93 mm.

Taking weight into consideration, the most lightweight Eufy model is the Solo IndoorCam C24, while the heaviest is the Eufy Floodlight Cam 2 at 2220g. For Arlo, the lightest is the Arlo Essential Wireless and Essential Wired, while the heaviest model is the Arlo Pro 3.

Weather Resistance 

Most of the Eufy security cameras have either IP65 or IP67 ratings, ensuring their durability in various weather conditions. Arlo, on the other hand, uses a more generic term, “weather-resistant,” which does not provide as much detail about the protection level offered.

Operating Temperature

Eufy offers a wide range of security cameras, including indoor, outdoor, and doorbell cameras. The Eufy Solo IndoorCam C24 and Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X are both designed for indoor use, and both have a similar operating temperature range (32°F – 104°F) and humidity of up to 90%. 

Additionally, the Eufy Solo OutdoorCam C24 and Solo OutdoorCam C22 are built for outdoor use and have an IP67 rating, which means they are protected from dust and water immersion up to 1m in depth.

On the other hand, Arlo's lineup includes options such as the Arlo Pro 5S 2K, Pro 3, and Pro 4, all of which are weather-resistant and have an operating temperature range of -4°F to 113°F. 

The Arlo Essential Wireless, Essential Wired, and Essential have similar weather-resistant features and temperature ranges. One important distinction is the Arlo Essential Indoor, which is not weatherproof.

Camera Models Included in Analysis

Sources

• https://us.eufy.com
• https://www.arlo.com/en-us/

The post Eufy vs Arlo: Security Camera Showdown appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

In this article, I examined and compared the features, capabilities, and performance of 15 Eufy cameras and 31 Reolink security cameras across nine categories to help you decide which is best for you.

A comprehensive list of model codes included in the analysis is included at the end of the article. Let’s get started! 

The Winners

Both Eufy vs Reolink have a lot in common, such as offering good-quality cameras with local storage for privacy and no monthly fees. Pricing for both brands is also on par (with the exception of the very high-end Reolink PTZ cameras)

Best for Smart Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Comprehensive Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Smart Security: Eufy

Eufy cameras generally have an advantage when it comes to installation, as they rely more on Wi-Fi than Power over Ethernet (PoE). 

Additionally, they offer enhanced smart motion detection capabilities, including facial recognition, and often feature built-in sirens, setting them apart from Reolink models. 

In terms of integration with smart home systems, most Eufy models seamlessly work with Alexa, Google Assistant, and even Apple HomeKit, while Reolink cameras have more limited support. 

These cameras are ideal for individuals seeking one or two cameras for home surveillance purposes as their cameras tend to provide a wider field of view, making them suitable for users who desire broad coverage with just a couple of cameras, rather than a meticulous arrangement of wide and narrow-focused surveillance devices

Best for Comprehensive Security: Reolink

Reolink cameras provide a more comprehensive surveillance solution for homes or businesses, thanks to their reliance on a professional-grade wired setup rather than just Wi-Fi. They offer convenient kits that include up to 8 cameras and a Network Video Recorder (NVR), allowing for a scalable and robust security system. 

Their cameras also excel in interoperability with their compatibility with ONVIF, a standard protocol for IP-based security products. 

Unlike Eufy, Reolink also offers camera models with optical zoom and motorized lenses, enabling users to adjust the zoom level remotely for enhanced visibility.

 In terms of PTZ (Pan-Tilt-Zoom) functionality, Reolink surpasses Eufy with superior camera models that provide greater control and flexibility for monitoring larger areas. 

Additionally, Reolink cameras support 5GHz Wi-Fi, offering faster and more reliable wireless connectivity compared to Eufy's limited Wi-Fi support.

Winners per Category

Summary

In this section, I compared the camera types, power and data transmission options, pricing, cloud subscription services, and standard warranty of Eufy vs Reolink.

Camera Types

When it comes to camera types, both Eufy vs Reolink offer a variety, such as bullet, freestanding, floodlight, video doorbell, and more. 

Eufy also has a selection of wall light and spotlight cameras, while Reolink has additional offerings, such as PTZ (Pan-Tilt-Zoom) and dome cameras.

PTZ cameras are popular for their ability to cover larger areas, as they can pan and tilt their lens to survey different parts of a location. Dome cameras are known for their discreet appearance and ability to blend into a location's aesthetics, making them ideal for businesses and public spaces.

Power and Data Transmission

Eufy mainly offers wireless data transmission and a mix of wired and battery power options. 

Similarly, Reolink has a selection of wireless and wired data transmission choices, but they focus more on wired power options. 

If you're looking for a wireless option with battery power, both brands provide viable choices, such as Eufy's eufyCam 2 and Reolink's Argus 2.

Pricing

Both brands cover a wide range, from budget to high-end options. Eufy's Solo IndoorCam C24 and Reolink's Argus Eco, for example, are reasonably priced options for those on a tight budget. 

If you're looking for top-of-the-line cameras, you might consider Eufy's Floodlight Cam 2 Pro, SoloCam S40, or Reolink's RLC-823A 16X, a high-end PTZ camera.

Cloud Subscription Services 

Eufy offers optional subscriptions for most models, while Reolink also provides optional subscriptions, with a few models not having that option available. 

This flexibility allows users to choose whether or not they want to pay for additional cloud storage on a case-by-case basis, depending on the features associated with Eufy vs Reolink.

Standard Warranty Offered

Most Eufy cameras have a 1-year warranty, while Reolink models come with a 2-year warranty. 

This could be a deciding factor if you're looking for added peace of mind and assurance in the longevity and support of your security camera.

Video Transmission and Camera Power

Here, I specifically looked at power options, data transmission processes, and data types of Eufy and Reolink.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink stands out with a wider range of power options and data transmission options, including PoE and 5GHz WiFi.

Power Options

Eufy cameras offer multiple power choices, such as AC power, DC power, and batteries, with some models like the Eufy S120 and SoloCam S40 also compatible with solar panels. 

Reolink's camera models have diverse power options such as DC power, PoE (Power over Ethernet), and battery, and many models like Argus 3 Pro are compatible with solar panels as well.

Data Transmission

Both Eufy and Reolink offer wireless transmission methods such as 2.4GHz WiFi, making them ideal for easy installation and setup. 

Reolink goes a step further by providing 5GHz WiFi support in several models like the E1 Zoom and RLC-542WA. A few models from both brands also offer 4G LTE support, such as the Eufy 4G Starlight and Reolink Go PT Plus.

Local & Cloud Storage

With regard to the storage and smart interaction capabilities of each brand, I focused on its storage capacity, storage options, and compatibility features. 

Winner: Reolink 

Reolink cameras have larger and more diverse storage capacity and broader interoperability features such as ONVIF, RTSP, and P2P.

Storage Capacity

Eufy and Reolink vary in their onboard storage options. Eufy cameras tend to have smaller storage capacities, ranging from 4GB to 128 GB. In contrast, Reolink cameras usually offer larger capacities, going up to 256GB. 

Storage Options

Eufy has a mix of eMMC (embedded multimedia card), microSD, NAS (network-attached storage), and Cloud storage options across its camera models. Some Eufy models also use wireless hubs for storage. 

Reolink also offers a variety of storage options including microSD, NVR (network video recorder), FTP (file transfer protocol), and Cloud storage.

For example, Eufy's Floodlight Cam 2 Pro stands out with its 8GB internal storage and compatibility with NAS and eMMC. 

The Duo 4G, on the other hand, has 128GB onboard storage and supports microSD and Cloud storage options, making it a versatile choice for those seeking a camera with more elaborate storage capabilities.

Interoperability

In terms of the cameras’ capability to communicate and work with other systems and devices, both Eufy and Reolink offer this feature. 

However, Reolink has a more significant advantage, as most of their models support ONVIF, RTSP, and P2P protocols, which enable easy integration with various devices and systems such as NVRs and smart home ecosystems. 

Eufy cameras typically support RTSP in some models, which is a standard protocol for streaming video.

Smart Monitoring

In terms of smart integration and intelligence features, I analyzed both brands’ capabilities and customization of motion zones and sensitivity. 

Winner: Eufy

Eufy products are compatible with a broader range of smart home devices and come equipped with advanced smart motion detection features.

Smart Integrations

Both Eufy and Reolink have various smart integrations. 

Most Eufy models integrate with Alexa, Google Assistant, and some even with Apple HomeKit like the Solo IndoorCam C24 and eufyCam 2 Pro, making them compatible with a wider range of smart home ecosystems.

Reolink offers Google Assistant and Chromecast compatibility, while some models also support Google Nest Hub and Alexa integration like the E1 Zoom, RLC-823A 16X, RLC-830A, RLC-1224A.

Configurable Motion Zones

This feature, which allows you to customize the areas that the camera monitors, is available in most Eufy and Reolink models included in this research. 

Both Eufy and Reolink generally offer configurable motion sensitivity options in their cameras, allowing you to adjust how easily motion is detected. 

Motion Alerts

Both brands provide motion alerts, most commonly through push notifications. Reolink models also offer email alerts, giving users an additional method to receive notifications about detected motion events.

Smart Motion Detection Features

In this aspect, Eufy tends to provide more advanced features than Reolink. Most Eufy cameras offer Person Detection and several models also include Animal Detection, Sound Detection, and Face Detection. 

Reolink models typically provide Person Detection and Vehicle Detection, with some models offering Animal Detection as well. If you are looking for advanced smart motion detection features, Eufy may be a better option.

Two-Way Audio

Here, I specifically looked at Eufy and Reolink’s audio capabilities like integrated microphones and speakers, alarms, and sirens. 

Winner: Eufy

A majority of Eufy cameras support two-way communication and come with integrated sirens.

Integrated Microphone, Speakers, and Two-Way Audio

Eufy and Reolink offer several security camera models with impressive audio capabilities. 

Most of the cameras from both brands support an integrated microphone, an integrated speaker, and two-way audio. 

This is crucial for users who need to engage in real-time communication with visitors or potential threats through the camera system.

Siren and Alarm features

Eufy and Reolink models have different offerings in this regard. 

Several Eufy cameras come with an integrated siren, and its loudness typically ranges from 90 to 105 decibels. This is important for people who want their cameras to be able to emit loud sound alarms to deter intruders. 

Out of the various Eufy models, notable ones include the Solo IndoorCam C24 and the Floodlight Cam 2 Pro. 

The Solo IndoorCam C24 is an indoor camera that features an integrated microphone and speaker, as well as two-way audio capabilities. The Floodlight Cam 2 Pro is an outdoor camera with similar audio features, plus a 100-decibel siren for deterring intruders.

Some Reolink cameras also have integrated sirens like E1 Zoom and Argus 2E. Both models come with an integrated microphone, speaker, siren alarm, and two-way audio support. 

Footage

Here I examined the brands’ video features including the recording capabilities, video coding formats, privacy masking options, and wide dynamic range (WDR).

Winner: Draw

While Eufy has Privacy Masking or adjustments in brightness, contrast, and sharpness and models with WDR features, Reolink predominantly has better efficiency in video file storage, and offers more flexibility in terms of frame rates, video streams, and recording options.

Continuous and Motion-Activated Recording 

Eufy offers a mix of continuous and motion-activated recording options in its portfolio. For example, the Solo IndoorCam C24 and Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X both support continuous recording, while the SoloCam S40 and the eufyCam 2C Pro rely on motion-activated recording. 

Reolink provides a variety of models with continuous or motion-activated recording, such as the RLC-410W and RLC-511WA featuring both, Argus Eco, Argus 2E, and Argus 2 with motion-activated recording only.

Frame Rates

In terms of frame rates, Eufy has some models having a maximum frame rate of 15. Reolink, on the other hand, provides more options in terms of frame rates.  For instance, the E1 Zoom supports a maximum frame rate of 20, RLC-823A 16X and RLC-830A models offer 25, while the RLC-511WA can go up to 30. 

Video Coding Formats

A few models from Eufy like the Solo IndoorCam C24 and SoloCam S40 are equipped with H.265 coding format. 

Reolink, on the other hand, primarily uses the H.265 coding format for all of its models included in this research, ensuring efficient compression of video files. 

Wide Dynamic Range

A few Eufy cameras offer WDR functionality such as the Solo IndoorCam C24, Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X, and the Video Doorbell 2K (Battery).

As for Reolink, digital WDR (Wide Dynamic Range) or HDR (High Dynamic Range) is only in its RLC-511W model.

Unique Features

Eufy cameras have unique features such as Privacy Masking in the S100 model and Saturation, Brightness, Contrast, and Sharpness adjustments on the SoloCam S40, while privacy masking is also present in Reolink’s Argus 2E model. 

Reolink has a mix of both single and dual video stream support. For instance, the E1 Zoom, Argus 3 Pro Solar, and Argus Pro have a single video stream, while other models like the RLC-823A 16X, RLC-833A, and E1 Pro have dual video stream support. 

Reolink also offers 3D-DNR or Digital Noise Reduction which decreases picture noise and reduces color mixture errors on its RLC-410W and RLC-511W models.

Infrared, Spotlights, and Low Light Sensors

Here, I took into consideration the night vision capabilities of both brands focusing on types of night vision, spotlight features, infrared distance, and active deterrence technology.

Winner: Draw

Both brands feature night vision and spotlight on selected models.

Types of Night Vision

Infrared night vision is available in most models, with Eufy offering it in 14 products and Reolink in 22. However, some security cameras also provide full-color night vision through a spotlight or low-light sensor technology. Eufy has 10 models with this feature, while Reolink has 13.

Spotlights

Eufy offers spotlight-equipped cameras with a range of lumens from 300 to 3000, while Reolink has a range of 180 to 945 lumens. 

Infrared Distance

Reolink generally offers a larger range, providing up to 262 feet in total darkness for some models, such as the RLC-823A 16X. Eufy cameras, on the other hand, have infrared distances from 25 feet to 32.8 feet for most models.

If you're looking for an indoor camera, Eufy has options like the Solo IndoorCam C24 and Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X with an Infrared Distance of 32.8 feet.

Reolink also has indoor camera options, such as the E1 Pro, E1 Zoom, and Argus PT 2K, boasting infrared distances of up to 40 feet.

For homeowners who require outdoor cameras, both brands have options with added features. Eufy's Solo OutdoorCam C24 and C22 offer Infrared and Full Color via a Spotlight.

Reolink also has outdoor cameras like Argus 2E, Argus Eco, Argus 2, and Argus Pro, all equipped with Infrared Night Vision.

Active deterrence technology

This feature deters intruders through light, sound, or other means. Reolink offers this feature in 14 models. However, Eufy does provide extra deterrence through its Floodlight Cam 2 Pro and Floodlight Cam 2 models, which have powerful lights of 2500 and 3000 lumens, respectively.

Camera Image Sensors

Here, I've looked at various factors such as field of view, lens type, and resolution of camera models included in the research.

Winner: Draw

Eufy cameras generally offer a wider field of view, while Reolink offers higher resolution options and more flexible lens configurations. 

Field of View

Eufy cameras have a wide field of view, with most models ranging from 105 to 160 degrees in the horizontal plane. This broad coverage allows for monitoring larger areas with a single camera. 

On the other hand, the field of view for Reolink cameras is generally within a range of 80 to 122 degrees, which is narrower than some Eufy cameras, but still sufficient for most home security needs.

Types of Lenses

All Eufy cameras in this research come with fixed-focus lenses, while Reolink cameras offer either fixed-focus or motorized lenses like the E1 Zoom, RLC-833A, Argus Eco, and RLC-511WA, allowing users to zoom in and out or adjust the focus remotely.

Resolution

Some Eufy camera models provide 2K or 3MP output, with the 4G Starlight having the highest resolution of 5 MP.

Meanwhile, Reolink’s resolution ranges from 2 MP to 8 MP, with the RLC-1224A standing out with a 12MP resolution. 

Motorized Panning, Tilting, and Zooming

Here, I scrutinized the pan, tilt, and zoom capabilities of the camera models included in this research. 

Winner: Reolink

Reolink offers more cameras with pan and tilt functions compared to Eufy. They also have cameras with motorized lenses for optical zoom, unlike Eufy.

Pan and Tilt 

Reolink offers more models with pan and tilt functions compared to Eufy. 

For instance, models like the E1 Zoom, RLC-823A, and RLC-523WA have pan capabilities, covering an angle of 355 to 360 degrees. 

In contrast, only a few Eufy models, like the Solo IndoorCam P24 T8410X and the Floodlight Cam 2 Pro, feature a pan function with a similar range. 

Optical and Digital Zoom

When it comes to zoom functionality, Reolink has several models with optical zoom such as the RLC-823A 16X and RLC-833A with 3x optical zoom. Eufy, on the other hand, primarily offers digital zoom on some of their models like the Solo IndoorCam C24 and the eufyCam 2 Pro, both featuring up to 8x digital zoom.

Tracking

Both brands provide models with PTZ preset and tracking features, enabling users to set specific monitoring points or to make their cameras track moving objects. The Reolink RLC-823A and the RLC-523WA are notable examples of cameras with these features, while the Eufy Floodlight Cam 2 Pro also includes preset capabilities.

Build Quality

When examining the device features of Eufy and Reolink, I specifically checked the cameras’ build quality, weather resistance, operating temperature, and weight.

Winner: Draw

Eufy offers a variety of weather-resistant models with a generally lighter design, while Reolink’s higher-end range comes with metal aluminum casings. Other than these higher-end cameras, the build quality of both brands is on par.

Build Quality

When examining the build quality of the cameras, Eufy primarily uses plastic in its cameras. Reolink, on the other hand, often employs metal aluminum and even an IK10 vandal-proof casing in some models, like the RLC-542WA. This suggests higher durability and reliability for outdoor use in the Reolink range.

Weather Resistance 

Eufy cameras generally feature an IP65 or IP67 rating, with the latter being more resistant to the elements. Reolink cameras mostly possess an IP66 rating, with a few models labeled as “weather-resistant” without specifying an IP rating. 

Overall, both brands offer a good range of weather-resistant cameras suitable for various environments.

Operating Temperature

If you live in an area with extreme temperatures, this feature is valuable in deciding which camera to get.  

Eufy cameras can function in temperatures as low as -4°F, while Reolink cameras can operate from 14°F. However, both brands feature cameras that can withstand temperatures up to 122°F or 131°F, depending on the model.

Both Eufy and Reolink offer devices that can handle high humidity levels of up to 90%. 

Weight 

If you prefer lightweight cameras, Eufy has options like the Solo IndoorCam C24 and eufyCam 2C Pro, weighing 98g and 196g, respectively. 

Reolink also has lightweight models such as the Argus 2E and Lumus, with weights of 230g and 185g, respectively.

How I Tested

Sources

https://us.eufy.com

https://reolink.us.com/

The post Breaking It Down: Eufy vs Reolink Compared appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

In this article, I explore and compare the key features of 38 security cameras (7 camera models from Blink and 31 models from Reolink). You can see the full list of product codes included in this research, at the bottom of the article. 

Read on to discover which brand reigns supreme in this titanic battle!

The Winners

Best for Simple Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Comprehensive Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Simple Security: Blink

Blink is my winner when it comes to a simple security solution. They excel in providing a hassle-free installation process, thanks to their wireless setup, eliminating the need for complex wiring. 

Most of their cameras are battery-powered and Blink cameras rely on cloud storage to store video footage securely, ensuring easy access to recordings from anywhere. This cloud-focused approach means that there is no dependence on local storage devices that can be prone to damage or theft. 

One of the standout features of Blink cameras is their budget-friendly price points, making them an attractive choice for those seeking affordable security solutions without compromising on quality. (That being said, you’ll probably need to factor in the cloud cost over the lifetime of the cameras)

Despite their affordability, Blink cameras still offer advanced features such as motion detection and customizable alert settings. 

Additionally, Blink cameras boast impressive battery life, minimizing the need for frequent battery changes and ensuring continuous surveillance coverage.

Best for Comprehensive Security: Reolink

When it comes to comprehensive security, Reolink is my winner. 

Its cameras cater to different installation preferences and locations and provide flexibility with options for local storage using SD cards or external hard drives, as well as the choice of optional cloud storage for remote access to footage.

Reolink cameras are also equipped with advanced detection features for vehicles, objects, and even animals. 

Another notable feature is the inclusion of PTZ cameras and motorized lenses in certain Reolink camera models. This allows for remote control of the camera's zoom and focus, resulting in clearer resolution and the ability to capture important details even from a distance. 

Their cameras are also designed to withstand various weather conditions, ensuring reliable performance and protection even in challenging environments.

Winners per Category

As you can see below, I opt for Reolink in most categories. However, that’s not to say that Blink cameras aren’t any good. If you’re looking for a simple camera to set up, then it's well worth it. However, if you’re serious about home security, then a more comprehensive camera system from Reolink is definitely a better choice.

Summary

To kick off, I evaluated the various attributes of the camera models, paying special attention to the types of cameras available, pricing options, cloud subscription services, and warranty durations offered by Blink and Reolink.

Camera Types

Blink offers a limited range of cameras for both indoor and outdoor use, which include floodlights, cube cameras, video doorbells, and pan-tilt (PT) models. 

Reolink, on the other hand, has an extensive range of security cameras covering various types, including PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom), turret, bullet, spotlight, multisensor panoramic, and PT models.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, a majority of Blink cameras fall within the budget to mid-range price categories, making them an affordable choice for many homeowners. However, you need to factor in the cost of cloud subscriptions with Blink, as it is typically needed.

Reolink cameras span across budget, mid-range, to high-end. For example, at the time of writing, the Argus 2E bullet camera is available at $62.99, while the high-end RLC-823A PTZ model is priced at $314.99. Reolink Cloud is an optional extra, that most people don’t need. 

Cloud Subscription Services 

Both Blink and Reolink offer optional cloud subscriptions for some models, making it convenient for users to access their footage remotely.

Standard Warranty Offered

Blink provides a standard 1-year warranty for their products, while Reolink provides a 2-year standard warranty.

Video Transmission and Camera Power

When analyzing the power and data functionalities of both brands, I focused on the power options, data transmission techniques, and data formats supported by Blink and Reolink.

Winner: Reolink

Blink cameras tend to be battery or DC powered, transmitting over 2.4GHz Wi-Fi. Reolink, on the other hand, has a wide variety of options to suit different requirements (PoE, AC/DC, Battery, Solar, Wi-Fi, 4G)

Power Options

Blink cameras primarily rely on battery power, with the Wired Floodlight Camera, Mini Pan-Tilt Camera, and Mini Indoor Security Camera offering wired power options. 

On the other hand, Reolink cameras offer a broader range of power options, including DC power, PoE (Power over Ethernet), and battery options with solar panel compatibility such as the Argus Eco, Argus 2E, Duo 4G, and Go PT Plus.

Data Transmission

All Blink models use 2.4GHz WiFi to transmit data and are IP cameras, making them suitable for most modern home networks.

A significant portion of the Reolink models supports both 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi bands, offering greater flexibility and performance in wireless data transmission.

Additionally, some models like the Duo 4G and Go Plus also provide 4G LTE connectivity for remote locations without Wi-Fi access.

Data Type

Both Blink and Reolink use IP (Internet Protocol) data types, which means they can send and receive data over the internet. This enables the devices to offer features like live streaming, remote access, and real-time alerts.

Local & Cloud Storage

When examining the storage and smart integration capabilities of each brand, I focused on storage capacity, available storage choices, and interoperability functions.

Winner: Reolink

While Blink focuses on cloud-based storage for easy access, Reolink has a wide array of storage types ranging from on-device SD cards to NVRs, FTP, and even the cloud. Blink cameras are generally locked down, while Reolink’s are open ONVIF support.

Storage Capacity

All Reolink models included in this research support on-board storage, with capacities ranging from 64GB to 256 GB.

Storage Options

Blink cameras are generally wireless and come with various storage options, including cloud storage and wireless hubs with USB flash drives. 

Most Reolink models are compatible with microSD cards, NVR (Network Video Recorder), and FTP (File Transfer Protocol), providing a more versatile and secure option for footage storage. 

Additionally, a cloud storage option is also available for models like the Argus Eco, Argus 2E,  Argus PT 2K, and Lumus.

Interoperability

This feature ensures seamless integration with various security and surveillance applications and management tools.

Reolink models come with superior interoperability, offering compatibility with Synology, ONVIF (Open Network Video Interface Forum), RTSP (Real-Time Streaming Protocol), and P2P (Peer to Peer) in many models. 

Smart Monitoring

Here, I compared the intelligence features of Blink and Reolink cameras. I particularly examined their smart integrations, customizable motion zones and sensitivity, motion alerts, and smart motion detection capabilities.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink provides more smart integrations and has more advanced motion detection features, like vehicle and animal detection compared to Blink cameras.

Smart Integrations

As Blink is owned by Amazon, their cameras primarily integrate with Amazon Alexa, Echo Show, and Fire TV, while Reolink offers compatibility with Google Assistant, Chromecast, and Google Nest Hub. 

This makes Reolink a better option for those who use Google smart home devices, and Blink for those who prefer Amazon's ecosystem.

Configurable Motion Zones and Sensitivity

Almost all Blink models allow their users to customize motion zones and sensitivity. For Reolink, more than half of the models included in this research also provide this feature including the E1 Zoom, Argus 3, Go PT Plus, and E1 Pro. 

Motion Alerts

Both Blink and Reolink cameras can send push notifications when motion is detected. However, Reolink cameras take it a step further by providing the option to receive email alerts. Reolink users might appreciate this additional way of receiving important notifications.

Smart Motion Detection Features

Among the Blink models in this research, only the Wired Floodlight Camera supports person detection (as of the time of writing).

On the other hand, Reolink offers various models with sophisticated smart motion detection features. 

Many models, such as the RLC-823A 16X, RLC-830A, and RLC-833A, are equipped with person detection, vehicle detection, and even animal detection capabilities. 

In terms of customization of motion detection settings, most Blink and Reolink cameras allow users to configure motion zones and sensitivity levels. By adjusting these features, homeowners can reduce false alarms and receive more accurate notifications.

Microphones and Speakers

In analyzing the audio capabilities of each brand, I took into consideration factors such as the quality of the microphone and speaker, the effectiveness of the two-way audio feature, and siren and alarm options.

Winner: Draw

I’ve called this one a draw with the majority of models supporting two-way audio.

Integrated Microphone, Speakers, and Two-Way Audio

Almost all Blink and Reolink cameras I analyzed have two-way audio, with integrated microphones and speakers, except for a few Reolink models that only have microphones without two-way audio functionality. (like the RLC-410W, RLC-520A, RLC-810A, RLC-822A, RLC-542WA, and RLC-511W).

Siren and Alarm Features

Among the Blink models, only the Wired Floodlight Camera has a built-in siren, with a loudness of 105 dB. 

Most of the Reolink models come with an integrated siren, whereas a few, like the RLC-410W, RLC-520A, RLC-810A, RLC-822A, RLC-542WA, and RLC-511W do not have this feature.

Video Output

Here, I specifically focused on the video features of both brands, I closely looked at each of the camera’s recording capabilities, video quality, video coding format, and WDR functionality.

Winner: Draw

Both Blink and Reolink have almost the same functionalities, maximum frame rates, and video coding formats. 

Continuous Recording vs Motion-Activated Recording

Blink cameras generally do not support continuous recording, whereas all PoE Reolink cameras support this feature (like the RLC-511WA, RLC-410W, RLC-523WA, and RLC-511W). 

Motion-activated recording, on the other hand, is available for all Blink cameras and a majority of Reolink models also have this feature. 

Video Quality

Blink cameras have a max supported frame rate of 30 frames per second (FPS),  while the number for Reolink cameras varies across its models but ranges from 15 to 30 FPS. 

A higher FPS means smoother video playback, improved evidence documentation, enhanced live monitoring, and finer details in recorded footage.

Video Coding Format

Reolink cameras generally support H.265 and H.264 video compression formats.

For Blink cameras, only the Outdoor 3rd Gen and 3rd Generation models specified their video coding formats at H.264 format.

Video coding format is crucial as it directly impacts storage efficiency, network bandwidth utilization, video quality, and compatibility with various devices and systems.

Night Vision

In terms of the night vision capabilities of both brands, I focused on the types of night vision, spotlight features, and infrared distance of the cameras.

Winner: Draw

Both brands offer night vision functionalities, with models also offering spotlight features for illumination.

Types of Night Vision

Blink cameras feature infrared night vision in most of their models, while Reolink offers a mix of infrared and full-color night vision capabilities. 

Among the seven Blink camera models, the Wired Floodlight Camera and Outdoor 3rd Gen achieve full-color night vision through the spotlight feature.

As for Reolink, 14 out of the 31 models (such as the RLC-511WA, Lumus, and RLC-812A), also do the same, where the spotlights toggle on automatically when needed. 

This can provide greater detail in the captured footage and result in more accurate identification of subjects.

Spotlights

As earlier mentioned, both Blink and Reolink offer cameras with built-in spotlights.

Several Reolink models have spotlight lumens of 700 up to 945 for RLC-523WA and RLC-823A, while Blink has two models with this feature, the Outdoor 3rd Gen with a spotlight lumens of 700, and the Wired Floodlight Camera which has the highest lumen output of 2600 among all cameras from both brands.

Infrared Distance

Reolink generally provides longer infrared distances in their models, ranging from 33 to 262 feet depending on the camera. This is in comparison to Blink models, which show a maximum range of only 20 feet in one model.

Furthermore, Reolink cameras often feature a higher number of infrared LEDs, which can lead to more powerful night vision capabilities.

Camera & Lens

Field of view, lens type, and resolution of the camera are some of the features that I evaluated when analyzing the camera and lens specifications of Blink and Reolink.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink cameras generally have higher resolution and FOV than Blink, and also offer models with motorized lenses, allowing users to adjust the field of view, enabling them to zoom in or out to capture a wider or narrower scene.

Field of View

FOV determines the area the camera captures. A larger FOV means the camera can cover more ground, potentially reducing the number of cameras you need for your property. However, it tends to do this at the expense of image quality.

Blink cameras generally have a diagonal FOV ranging from 110° to 143°, while Reolink cameras offer a wider range, with some models reaching up to 180° in the Duo multi lens. 

This indicates that Reolink cameras may offer broader coverage, depending on the specific model.

Lens Type

Blink cameras included in this research feature fixed-focus lenses, which have a pre-set focal length and are less versatile in terms of adjusting the view range. 

On the other hand, Reolink offers both fixed-focus and motorized lenses. The E1 Zoom, RLC-823A 16X, and RLC-833A are some of the models that feature motorized lenses, which allow more control in zooming and adjusting the focus. 

This added flexibility is particularly beneficial for those looking to capture images over varying distances.

Resolution

Generally, cameras with higher resolution provide clearer and more detailed images, making it easier to identify intruders or other incidents. 

Most Blink cameras offer 2MP (1080P / HD: 1920×1080) resolution. Reolink, on the other hand, offers a wider range of resolutions, from 2MP (1920×1080) up to 12MP (4512×2512) for the RLC-1224A model. 

Aperture

This feature can affect the camera's low-light performance. Larger apertures capture more light and typically provide better performance under dim conditions. 

While there isn't much information available for Blink cameras' aperture sizes, Reolink cameras generally have aperture sizes ranging from F1.6 to F2.4. This suggests that Reolink cameras may perform better in low-light situations.

Pan-Tilt-Zoom

In this section I assessed the pan, tilt, and zoom capabilities, tracking functionalities, and PTZ camera options of Blink and Reolink.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink has a wider range of cameras with pan and tilt capabilities and also has superior zoom capabilities with optical zoom as opposed to digital zoom in some models.

PTZ Capabilities

Pan, tilt, and zoom (PTZ)  allow you to remotely control the camera's movement and zoom to monitor different areas of your property. These features are more prominent in Reolink cameras compared to Blink cameras. 

A number of Reolink models have pan and tilt features, such as the Reolink E1 Pro, which has a pan angle of 355 degrees and a tilt angle of 50 degrees.

In contrast, only the Mini Pan-Tilt Camera from Blink has this feature, with a pan angle of 350 degrees and a tilt angle of 125 degrees.

Zoom Features

When it comes to zoom functionality, Reolink cameras generally offer both digital and optical zoom, while Blink cameras usually offer only digital zoom. 

Optical zoom allows for higher quality images as it uses the camera's lenses to magnify an image, while digital zoom enlarges the image through software. For example, the E1 Zoom has a 3x optical zoom and the RLC-823A 16X has a 16x optical zoom.

Tracking

Tracking capabilities are also more commonly found in Reolink models, such as RLC-823A and RLC-523WA, which have preset and tracking features. 

These features help the camera track and follow moving objects within its field of view. On the other hand, Blink cameras do not generally have tracking capabilities.

PTZ Camera Choices

When comparing indoor cameras, Blink tends to focus on compact and inconspicuous designs, like the Blink Mini Indoor Security Camera. 

Conversely, Reolink prioritizes features like pan and tilt capabilities, as seen in the E1 Pro model.

For outdoor cameras, Reolink offers models with higher digital zoom magnification like the Argus 3 Pro Solar, which has a 16x digital zoom. 

Build Quality

In terms of camera quality, I specifically focused on factors such as resistance to various weather conditions, materials used, suitability for indoor and outdoor use,  and recommended operating temperature range.

Winner: Reolink

Reolink offers cameras with a higher IP rating than Blink and their cameras are generally made with sturdier materials.

Weather Resistance 

Blink has a few outdoor cameras with IP65 weather resistance while Reolink, on the other hand, offers several models with IP65 and IP66 ratings. IP66 models are even better at protecting the camera from harsh weather conditions and water. 

This suggests Reolink may offer more durable options for outdoor camera installations.

Build Quality

The Reolink range offers a number of cameras with metal aluminum cases. These metal cases are more resistant and can better handle outdoor conditions compared to the plastic cases used in some Blink camera models.

Indoor and Outdoor Use

Blink cameras are mainly designed for indoor use, with only a few models suited for outdoor installations. 

In contrast, Reolink offers a more extensive range of cameras for both indoors and outdoors. 

Some Reolink cameras, such as the RLC-523WA, even feature IK10 vandal-proof protection, which adds another security layer by resisting vandalism attempts.

Operating Temperature

Blink outdoor cameras can operate in temperatures ranging from -4°F to 113°F, which is suitable for most environments.

In comparison, Reolink outdoor cameras have a wider temperature range of 14°F to 131°F which indicates that Reolink cameras may perform better in extreme temperatures and are suitable for a more extensive range of climates.

Cameras Included in Analysis

Resources

• https://blinkforhome.com/
• https://reolink.com/

The post Blink vs Reolink: The Ultimate Faceoff! appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

Catering to DIYers and installers alike, they each sell directly to customers via their website and their cameras are generally well-regarded.

In my research, I analyzed 45 cameras (17 Lorex models, and 28 Reolink models), along with a selection of kits and recorders.

I’ve also tested a number of cameras from both brands over the years and have found them to be pretty good quality and very reliable. The list of cameras analyzed along with links to my individual product reviews is at the bottom of the page.

The Winners

Best for Home Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Commercial Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Home Security: Reolink

If you are a homeowner looking for a few cameras to help improve your home security, then I’d definitely recommend Reolink over Lorex. 

They have better budget and mid-range camera options, particularly in the wireless and wire-free categories. Wireless cameras are also easier to install with less pulling cables.

Reolink cameras usually have local and cloud storage, decent image quality and night vision, two-way audio, and a solid mobile app.

Best for Commercial Security: Lorex

For large homes or businesses looking for a more comprehensive security solution, then I’d recommend Lorex over Reolink. 

Their cameras have bigger image sensors and therefore better night vision, stronger build quality, and offer more commercial-grade models.

They support coax cabling, offer more variety in NVR and DVR packages and have financing options available.

Winners per Category

Below is a quick look at the winners in each category.

Overview

While the consumer market is a target for both companies, Lorex has a more business-leaning focus than Reolink, with a range of higher-end cameras.

They both offer a wide range of products, including NVR, PoE cameras, Wi-Fi cameras, wire-free cameras, NVR camera packages, indoor cameras, and video doorbells.

Company Origins

Lorex has a longer track record than Reolink, having been established in 1991 compared to 2009. 

Originally a Canadian company, Lorex was acquired by the Chinese manufacturer, Dahua a number of years ago. However, with the impending NDAA regulation in the USA, the company has since been sold to a Taiwanese company, Skywatch.

Reolink is owned by Shenzhen Baichuan Security Technology Co., Ltd, based out of China.

Camera Types

Both Reolink and Lorex offer a wide range of security cameras in different budget ranges and camera types. These include PoE (Power over Ethernet), Wi-Fi, wire-free, PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom) cameras, and video doorbells.

Reolink also develops some specialty cameras like the Reolink Duo 2 which is a multisensor panoramic camera, the Reolink TrackMix, which is a multisensor PTZ and the Reolink Go, which is a 4G/LTE camera.

Lorex sells analog cameras like the C861XC-W, while Reolink does not have any analog cameras on offer.

Wired vs Wireless Cameras

Both Reolink and Lorex offer a mix of wired (via PoE), wireless (Wi-Fi with DC power), and wire-free camera models. However, Lorex’s catalog is very much weighted toward fully wired camera solutions (IP or analog).

Apps & Cloud

Unlike Lorex, Reolink has a cloud storage offering, with a free plan and paid plans starting from $3.49 per month.

Both brands offer Android and iOS apps. The Lorex apps have a higher rating on the various app stores, however, I have had more joy in personally operating the Reolink app.

Price & Budget

When considering price and product range, Reolink cameras tend to feature a broader selection, with models available in the budget to mid-range brackets. The majority of Lorex cameras fall within the mid-range to high-end price category.

This reflects Reolink's focus on the consumer market, while Lorex targets both consumers and businesses alike.

Warranty

Reolink offers a standard two-year warranty on its cameras, while Lorex only provides a one-year warranty. This may be an important factor for those seeking additional assurance on their investment.

1. Power & Data

Winner: Tie

Not much to set them apart. Lorex does sell analog cameras for older setups but that's not enough to win the category

When it comes to power options, both brands offer versatile choices such as DC Power, PoE (Power over Ethernet), Battery, and Solar Panels, making them suitable for both indoor and outdoor use.

Transmitting Data

One advantage of Lorex cameras is that they have a range of both IP and analog, while Reolink only uses IP. This means that if you prefer an analog connection, Lorex would be the better choice for you.

Reolink cameras predominantly use 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, 5GHz Wi-Fi, or PoE for transmitting data, whereas Lorex cameras offer these methods or coax cable. 

In terms of wireless connectivity, both Reolink and Lorex offer both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi options. This is great for users who experience network congestion or interference, as the 5GHz WiFi option can provide a faster and more stable connection.

2. Camera & Lens

Winner: Lorex

Lorex cameras have bigger image sensors on average and offer more options for motorized lenses.

Lens type is an important consideration in choosing a security camera. Reolink mostly offers cameras with fixed-focus lenses, which means that they have a predetermined focal length for capturing images. 

In contrast, Lorex offers models with both fixed focus and motorized lenses, the latter of which allows you to adjust the focal length for greater flexibility in image capture.

Motorized lenses generally have a variable field of view, depending on the optical zoom level you are at.

Field of View

On average, Reolink cameras tend to have a wider field of view, with some like the Reolink Duo 2 offering 180 degrees horizontal thanks to its two image sensors. 

In contrast, Lorex cameras have a mix of wide and narrow fields of view, depending on the lens type.

Resolution

Another factor to consider is the camera's resolution, which affects the clarity and detail of the images captured. Lorex offers models with resolutions ranging from 2MP to 4K (8MP) while Reolink has models that deliver 12MP resolution (RLC-1224A). Night vision tends to degrade the higher the resolution, with ghost effects and artifacts. So it's not always advisable to go for the highest resolution.

CMOS Sensors

When it comes to image sensors, Reolink and Lorex both predominantly use CMOS sensors. These sensors are commonly used in digital cameras due to their lower cost and ability to deliver high-quality images.

Lorex sensors tend to be bigger from 1/1.8″ (in the LNZ81P25) to 1/3″ (in the C861XC-W). This is how these cameras can achieve night vision in low-lighting conditions.

Most Reolink sensors range from 1/2.7″ to 1/3″

3. Video

Winner: Tie

Nothing to set them apart

When it comes to continuous recording, Reolink’s catalog is more skewed to battery / solar-powered cameras. These cameras cannot support continuous recording.

Lorex offers more wired cameras than battery cameras, and wired cameras generally do support continuous recording.

In terms of frame rates, both Reolink and Lorex cameras generally have a maximum supported frame rate of 15 to 30 frames per second (fps). A higher frame rate typically results in smoother, more fluid video playback.

Motion-Activated Recording

Both brands offer models with motion-activated recording (standard in battery/solar-powered cameras). This feature allows cameras to start recording when there is movement detected, which is a useful way to save storage space and minimize unnecessary recordings.

On the video coding front, Reolink provides cameras that support either H.264 or H.265 video coding. H.265 is known for its enhanced video compression and efficiency compared to H.264. 

In contrast, as Lorex also offers analog cameras, they have a wider range of video coding formats, including H.265, H.264, H.264H, HEVC, and NTSC/PAL. 

With these additional options, certain Lorex cameras may provide higher compatibility with older playback and storage devices.

WDR

From my research, it looks like neither Lorex nor Reolink offers True WDR. They both have cameras that offer Digital WDR also known as HDR.

WDR technology helps balance the exposure in challenging lighting situations, such as when there are bright and dark areas within the same frame, to create a clearer, more detailed image.

Additional features available in select camera models include Privacy Masking (offered by the Reolink Argus 2E), Noise Reduction, 3D Digital Noise Reduction (DNR), White Balance Control, and Gain Control (primarily offered by various Lorex models). These features contribute to enhancing the overall video quality and user experience.

4. Storage

Winner: Reolink

Most Reolink cameras have a local storage backup. Also, Reolink offers Cloud Storage options and is upfront about its compatibility with other systems.

Reolink models generally offer more onboard storage capacity, better compatibility with other systems, and versatile storage options, including cloud storage.

Lorex cameras tend to rely more on external storage systems like NVR and DVR. Up to the end of 2022, their cameras were manufactured by Dahua and were usually ONVIF compatible (despite not advertising them as such). With Lorex’s acquisition by Skywatch, it will be interesting to see if Dahua continues manufacturing Lorex cameras and how that will work in the United States with the NDAA ban.

Local Storage

Firstly, when it comes to local storage capacity, Reolink offers a broader range of choices as compared to Lorex. 

Most Reolink models come with either 128GB or 256GB storage capacity, while only a few Lorex models offer 128GB or 256GB. 

Network Video Recorders

Most Lorex and Reolink cameras work with their respective NVR recorders. 

Lorex cameras, however, tend to rely more heavily on Network Video Recorder (NVR) or Digital Video Recorder (DVR) systems for storage, as opposed to on-board or cloud.

External Connections

Interoperability is another important factor to consider. Most Reolink models are compatible with Synology systems, Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), and Peer-To-Peer (P2P) connections. This allows for more flexible integration with other devices and systems, making it easier to set up and manage your home security network. 

On the other hand, Lorex does not advertise how compatible their cameras are with other systems. (Probably to push you to buy a full package). As mentioned, Dahua systems are typically ONVIF compatible so the PoE cameras should work with other systems (unofficially at least)

Cloud Storage

Reolink cameras also generally include cloud storage support. 

This means that Reolink users can access and manage their recorded footage from anywhere with an internet connection, providing an additional layer of convenience and security. 

5. Audio

Winner: Reolink

Most Reolink cameras support two-way audio with an integrated microphone and speaker. Lorex cameras tend to be pretty good at their main job, which is to capture video, to the detriment of audio.

A crucial feature of a security camera is its audio capabilities, and there are several aspects of audio to consider: integrated microphones, sirens, speakers, and two-way audio communication.

Two-way Audio

Based on my research, Reolink typically offers cameras with more comprehensive audio features. The majority of Reolink models come with integrated microphones, sirens, and speakers, which allow for live audio monitoring, intruder deterrence, and enhanced user interactivity through two-way audio.

Lorex, on the other hand, offers a more varied range of audio options. Some models, like the E881AP-W, have an alarm interface, enabling the camera to connect to an external alarm system. 

However, many Lorex models lack built-in microphones and two-way audio communication. With that being said, there are still a good number of Lorex models that do offer these features, such as the F461AQD-E and the W461ASC-E.

Sirens

Some Lorex cameras, like the U471AA-E, offer a recorded siren loudness of 84.4 dB, which should be loud enough to alert you and possibly deter intruders.

6. Smart Integrations and Notifications

Winner: Reolink

Reolink cameras tend to be more consumer-grade so have more compatibility with smart devices and systems. They also typically support Person and Vehicle detection. Lorex has more sophisticated intelligence features, however, these are usually reserved for their more expensive cameras.

When it comes to smart home integration, Reolink generally offers better compatibility, with most models supporting Alexa, Google Assistant, Chromecast, and Google Nest Hub. On the other hand, Lorex models tend to have more limited integration options, often supporting just one or two platforms like Alexa, Google Assistant, Chromecast, Fire TV, or Apple TV. 

Motion Detection

As for motion detection features, both Reolink and Lorex cameras have configurable motion sensitivity settings with most offering customizable motion zones.

Motion alerts play a crucial role in home security, and both Reolink and Lorex provide motion-based alerts. Most Reolink camera models offer push notifications and email alerts, while Lorex cameras typically provide push notifications. (Depending on how the Lorex NVR is setup)

Smart Detection Features

To avoid false positives, it's essential to discuss smart motion detection features. In this regard, Reolink tends to offer person detection and vehicle detection across a range of their models. 

Some Lorex models also include these features, but not as consistently as Reolink. Higher-end Lorex cameras even offer face detection and the ability to detect abandoned or missing objects.

7. Night Vision

Winner: Lorex

Lorex has better camera sensors that work in low-light conditions. Also offers a floodlight camera

Most Reolink models have night vision enabled, and many offer multiple types of night vision. 

The majority of Reolink devices utilize infrared night vision, whereas several devices offer full-color night vision, either via a built-in spotlight with a couple through low-light sensor technology. 

On the other hand, Lorex cameras also come with night vision functionality, but the distribution between infrared and full-color is more evenly split. Like Reolink, full-color night vision in Lorex devices is offered through low-light sensors or a built-in spotlight/floodlight.

Low Light Sensor

Compared to Reolink, more Lorex cameras, such as the LNB9242B-W and E841CA-E can achieve color night vision without a spotlight, in low ambient light conditions, thanks to its low-light image sensor.

This generally means, Lorex image sensors are bigger and can let in more light.

Spotlights / Floodlights

Most Reolink devices come without a built-in spotlight feature. However, there are a few models that do include this feature. 

Via the integrated light, these models usually offer full-color night vision capabilities, with spotlight lumens ranging from 180 to 945, depending on the model. 

In contrast, a significant number of Lorex cameras offer built-in spotlight functionality with full-color night vision capabilities, with the brightest being the Lorex Floodlight with 4000 lumens.

While not a camera per se, Reolink has released a 2000-lumen floodlight.

8. Pan-Tilt-Zoom Capabilities

Winner: Tie

Reolink generally offers budget to mid-range consumer PTZ cameras, while Lorex offers a number of high-end PTZs with impressive optical zoom.

Reolink has expanded its PTZ offerings in the last 2 years and now sells multi-sensor PTZs (TrackMix Series) along with 4G, Battery/Solar, Wi-Fi, and PoE options.

While Reolink offers a wider variety of cameras with zoom capabilities and PTZ features, Lorex provides more advanced PTZ options with a wider range of optical zoom magnification in their models.

Digital Zoom

Firstly, let's discuss the zoom capabilities of the cameras from both brands. Digital zoom is a feature available in practically all Reolink and Lorex models. 

Reolink cameras typically have digital zoom magnification of 6 or 16 times. Digital zoom essentially crops the image and enlarges the cropped area, which usually results in lower image quality. 

Optical Zoom

On the other hand, optical zoom allows the camera lens to physically move to magnify the image, resulting in better picture quality. 

Optical zoom is a feature more commonly found in Lorex models compared to Reolink models. For example, the Lorex LNZ81P25 and E881AP-W cameras both have an impressive 25 times optical zoom.

Pan-Tilt-Zoom

Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) capabilities are also essential for those seeking a camera with enhanced coverage and movement. In Reolink's offerings, the RLC-523WA, E1 Outdoor, and Argus PT 2K models have pan and tilt features. 

The RLC-523WA and RLC-823A models also offer preset, pattern, and tracking capabilities. They have also released the Reolink TrackMix PoE which looks like an interesting mix of multi-sensor and PTZ.

Lorex, on the other hand, has multiple models like LNZ81P25 and LZV2925SC with full PTZ capabilities, featuring 360-degree panning, 90 to 180-degree tilting, and features like tours, presets, scans, and patterns.

9. Camera Build

Winner: Lorex

Some Lorex cameras tend to be more commercial grade and robust, with higher IP ratings, sturdier build quality, and can operate in sub-zero temperatures.

Reolink tends to offer more consumer camera models than Lorex. So these cameras tend to be lighter and have a more compact design.

Ingress Protection

IP rating indicates how well a camera can resist dust and water. Reolink cameras mostly have an IP65 or IP66 rating, meaning they are designed to be dust-tight and withstand water jets from any direction. 

Lorex cameras have a wider range of ratings, with some models like the LNZ81P25 rated IP67, providing protection from dust and immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. If you need a camera to be placed in a wet or dust-prone environment, Lorex may be a better choice due to its higher-rated models.

Build Quality

Reolink cameras often use metal aluminum, while Lorex cameras can be found in aluminum, aluminum alloy, polycarbonate, metal, and plastic. A difference in materials may affect durability and resistance against potential vandalism. 

For example, the Reolink RLC-542WA is made of IK10 vandal-proof materials, providing added security against tampering.

Temperatures

Operating temperature is another crucial factor, especially if you live in an area with extreme temperature fluctuations. Both brands perform well in high temperatures, with Reolink cameras generally operating at a maximum temperature of 131°F (55°C) and Lorex cameras ranging up to 158°F (70°C). However, Lorex cameras tend to have a wider range, with some models like the LNZ81P25 capable of operating down to -40°F (-40°C).

Research & Citations

Hands-On Product Testing

• https://smarthomeperfected.com/reolink-argus-pt-2k-security-camera-review/
• https://smarthomeperfected.com/reolink-argus-pro-security-camera-review/
• https://smarthomeperfected.com/lorex-wire-free-security-camera-system-review/

Camera Models included in Research

Sources

• https://reolink.com/
• https://www.lorex.com/

The post Reolink vs Lorex: Security Camera Head to Head! appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

In this article I carry out a comprehensive comparison, evaluating the key similarities and differences across 9 different categories, including storage, camera specs, intelligence, night vision, and more.

Over the years, I’ve had the opportunity to test a number of cameras from both brands, which has provided me with some important first-hand experience. I also collated the specs for 52 security cameras (breakdown of 28 Reolink and 24 Amcrest models) to give a helicopter view of what sets these brands apart.

A full list of the analyzed cameras, accompanied by links to my individual product reviews, can be found at the end of this page.

The Winners

Best for Home Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Advanced Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Home Security: Reolink

This was a close call however I’ve gone with Reolink as the best for home security. Reolink cameras and systems are generally easier to set up than Amcrests. 

There are a number of reasons for this. A larger percentage of Reolinks catalog are wireless or battery-powered cameras which are easier to install than wired. 

The Reolink app is better than Amcrest and their full camera range is more “plug-and-play” than Amcrests. Reolink also integrates with more smart home devices than Amcrest.

The cameras also tend to be within a household budget for security while also having a longer warranty, compared to Amcrest.

Best for Advanced Security: Amcrest

A lot of people I know who buy Amcrest cameras, generally don’t use the Amcrest app or an Amcrest NVR and instead install the cameras into Blue Iris via ONVIF.

This usually requires a higher level of knowledge than most people just looking for a simple security solution.

Amcrest’s cameras generally have better specs than Reolinks and tend to perform better at night. They are also sturdier which is important in a commercial setting. 

That being said, the Reolink specs are typically acceptable for most homeowners.

Winners per Category

Below is a quick look at the winners in each category.

Overview

Both Amcrest and Reolink were founded in the late 2000s (Amcrest in 2013 and Reolink in 2009).

They have similar product ranges, including NVR, PoE Cameras, Wi-Fi Cameras, Wire-Free Cameras, PTZ Cameras, NVR Camera Packages, Indoor Cameras, and Video Doorbells.

Reolink has more wire-free camera options, particularly in the mid-range and high-end categories while Amcrest, has more wired and analog camera options in all budget categories.

Having reviewed their product ranges, while both brands target a mix of businesses and consumers, I think Amcrest leans a little more toward commercial customers, with their higher-end cameras.

Amcrest and Reolink’s PoE cameras generally support ONVIF and RTSP protocols for interoperability with third-party devices and systems.

About the Brands

Amcrest cameras are manufactured by Dahua, which means they are not NDAA compliant. Reolink on the other hand is owned by Shenzhen Baichuan Security Technology Co., Ltd.

Amcrest offers a wider variety of products beyond security cameras, including GPS trackers, baby monitors, car dash cameras, drones, binoculars, and more, while Reolink primarily focuses on security cameras and systems.

Cloud

Each brand offers cloud storage through their respective platforms, Amcrest Smart Home Cloud and Reolink Cloud. 

Amcrest's cloud subscription offers more features, including Smart/AI Notifications, Rich App Previews, and Advanced App Features, while Reolink's cloud subscription primarily focuses on Cloud Storage.

Reolink offers a free plan with the standard Plan starting at $3.49, while Amcrest's subscription plans start at $1.99.

It’s worth mentioning, these Cloud plans are more aligned to the consumer-grade Wi-Fi and Battery powered cameras than the PoE models.

Mobile Apps

Amcrest has multiple mobile apps, but their quality isn't amazing with poor scores on the iOS and Android stores.

The Reolink mobile app fares a little better and I personally never have had problems with it.

Power and Data Connections

Amcrest cameras mostly use wired connections for both data and power, with some models offering wireless data and wired power connections. 

Reolink has a more diverse range of connection options, including cameras with wireless data and battery power, making them ideal for locations without easy access to power outlets. 

Both brands also offer models with optional cloud subscriptions for additional storage and features.

Pricing

Amcrest cameras are available across various price ranges – from budget options to high-end models. 

Their prices range from $34.99 to $919.99, ensuring there's a camera option for different budgets. 

Reolink also offers a selection of cameras across different price points, with their cameras priced between $44.99 and $299.99. 

Both brands provide a mix of budget, mid-range, and high-end camera models.

Warranty

It is important to note the difference in standard warranty periods for these two brands. Amcrest offers a 1-year standard warranty on their cameras, while Reolink provides a longer 2-year standard warranty on their products. 

This difference in warranty periods could help sway buyers seeking longer coverage for their security cameras.

1. Power & Data Support

Winner: Reolink

Amcrest has a number of Coax / Analog cameras which Reolink doesn’t. However, Reolink supports 5Ghz Wi-Fi where as most Wi-Fi Amcrest cameras don’t. Also, Reolink has specialist cameras like their 4G LTE range and also most of their battery-powered cameras can be powered by solar which is not the case with Amcrest.

Amcrest

Amcrest cameras offer a mix of both IP (Internet Protocol) and Coax security camera options. 

IP cameras send and receive data through Ethernet and can usually be accessed remotely, while analog cameras use coaxial cables to transmit video signals. 

Amcrest has a wide range of power options for its cameras, such as PoE (Power over Ethernet), DC Power, and AC Power. 

PoE allows cameras to be powered using the same Ethernet cable that also transmits data, simplifying installations. 

Some of their cameras also support Wi-Fi connectivity with 2.4GHz frequency, such as IP4M-1041W and IP5M-1190W models.

Reolink

Reolink, on the other hand, focuses primarily on IP cameras with no coax camera options. An interesting feature of Reolink cameras is the availability of cameras that support solar panels and batteries, such as the Argus 2E and Argus Eco models. 

This makes them a more eco-friendly and convenient choice for people who want to minimize their dependency on traditional power sources. 

Reolink also offers cameras that connect through 4G LTE (e.g., Go Plus and Go PT Plus models) which can be useful in areas where Wi-Fi connectivity is limited or unavailable. 

Additionally, Reolink provides cameras with dual-band Wi-Fi support (2.4GHz and 5GHz), such as the Argus 3 Pro Solar and RLC-511WA models, which can help reduce interference and provide more stable connections.

While Amcrest seems to offer more options in terms of camera types (IP and Coax) and power options (PoE, AC, and DC Power), Reolink provides greater flexibility in terms of connectivity (Wi-Fi, 4G LTE) and power options (solar panel and battery-powered cameras). 

2. Storage (including NVR & Cloud)

Winner: Tie

Not much difference between the brands here. Both offer Cloud for their consumer models. Both are ONVIF compatible in their PoE range.

First, let's discuss storage options for these security cameras. 

Local Storage

On-board storage capacity is essential when it comes to saving footage directly on the camera. Amcrest offers higher on-board storage capacity in many of its models, up to 256 GB, using a microSD card. 

In comparison, Reolink offers on-board storage of up to 256 GB for some models and only 128 GB or 64 GB storage capacity for others.

In addition to on-board storage, both brands also offer other storage options. 

NVR/NAS/Cloud

Almost all Amcrest models support NVR (Network Video Recorder), NAS (Network-Attached Storage), and FTP (File Transfer Protocol) in addition to Cloud storage. 

On the other hand, Reolink's support for different types of storage options varies between models; some have only microSD and Cloud storage support, while others also support NVR, FTP, and Cloud.

Compatibility with other Systems

Interoperability is essential when integrating a security camera with other security system components or software. 

Amcrest excels in this area, providing compatibility with various software such as Synology, QNAP, Blue Iris, ONVIF, RTSP, and CGI for many models. 

Reolink's interoperability options are wider in it’s PoE camera range (with a number supporting ONVIF) while there are fewer options in its Wi-Fi or Wire-Free range.

3. Audio & Alarms

Winner: Tie

More Reolink models have two-way capabilities and integrated alarms. However, Amcrest models are more catered to commercial applications with audio and alarm interfaces for external systems. 

One of the essential features to consider is a camera's audio capabilities, which include an integrated microphone, an integrated speaker, and two-way audio support. 

The majority of both Amcrest and Reolink models offer integrated microphones. When it comes to integrated speakers, more Reolink models feature this option compared to Amcrest cameras. 

Two-way audio is supported by several models in both brands, making it easier to communicate with the person on the other end of the camera.

Integrated Siren

Another audio aspect to consider is the presence of an integrated siren. While only a few Amcrest models have this feature, many Reolink models offer an integrated siren or alarm, making them a more suitable choice if you are looking for an additional layer of security.

The Amcrest models with a siren, boast 110 dB which is more than enough to deter an intruder. 

Alarm and Audio Interface

While only a few Amcrest models have an integrated siren, quite a number of them have an alarm interface, to connect an external alarm.

Likewise, an audio interface is more predominant in Amcrest models than their Reolink counterparts.

4. Camera & Lens Specs

Winner: Amcrest

Amcrest cameras tend to have larger image sensors which makes all the difference.

Amcrest

Amcrest offers a variety of camera models with various lens types and image sensors. Most Amcrest cameras have a fixed focal length, with focal lengths ranging from 1.4mm to 4mm. 

The brand also provides a mix of CMOS image sensors, with sizes from 1/1.8″ to 1/2.7″. Amcrest also has a few camera models with motorized lenses, offering adjustable focal lengths for more flexibility.

The resolution of Amcrest cameras ranges from 2MP (1080P/HD) to 4K/Ultra HD. Some popular models include the Amcrest IP2M-1083EW-AI, which boasts a motorized lens and a 4MP resolution, and the Amcrest IP8M-VT2879EW-AI, offering a non-fixed max aperture of F1.5 and 4K resolution.

Reolink

On the other hand, Reolink offers security cameras with mostly fixed focus lenses, particularly with a 2.8mm focal length. 

The majority of Reolink cameras use CMOS image sensors sized at 1/3″ which is a good deal smaller than Amcrest. 

A few Reolink models are equipped with motorized lenses, such as the RLC-511WA and the RLC-823A, which provide adjustable focal lengths and accommodate various viewing angles.

Reolink camera resolutions range from 2MP (1080P/HD) all the way up to 12MP, with the RLC-1224A, which is even bigger than 4K! 

Some notable Reolink models are the Argus 3 Pro and the RLC-820A, both offering a 4MP resolution, while the RLC-822A provides a higher resolution at 8MP.

Field of View

In terms of field of view, both brands offer cameras with wide horizontal and diagonal viewing angles. Amcrest has a fisheye model with a 180-degree diagonal field of view, while Reolink has the Reolink Duo 2, which boasts a 180-degree horizontal field of view across two image sensors.

5. Intelligence & Smart Detection

Winner: Tie

Amcrest has a raft of advanced features, which in reality are more suited to commercial applications (For example: people counting, heat maps, and tripwire detection). Reolinks features are better suited to consumers with little setup required.

Amcrest

Amcrest's security cameras offer advanced features like configurable motion zones and motion sensitivity adjustment, which allow users to fine-tune their security preferences. Many Amcrest cameras have smart features such as person detection, vehicle detection, face detection, object detection, and in some cases, people counting and heat maps. 

Some models also offer unique features like tripwire detection, intrusion detection, and missing object alerts for added security.

Reolink

Reolink, on the other hand, focuses more on simplicity and ease of use. Many Reolink cameras come integrated with popular smart assistants like Alexa and Google Assistant, allowing users to control their cameras using voice commands. 

Reolink's major selling point is its compatibility with various smart home devices like Chromecast, Google Nest Hub, Echo Show, and Fire TV. Most Reolink models offer standard smart features such as person detection and vehicle detection. 

However, in comparison to Amcrest, Reolink models are not as feature-rich when it comes to perimeter protection or advanced analytics.

Motion Detection

When it comes to motion alerts and notifications, both Amcrest and Reolink offer push notifications and email alerts tailored to the user's preferences. Some Amcrest models also have configurable motion sensitivity and motion zones, which allow users to minimize false alerts by focusing on important areas within the camera's field of view. Reolink models generally provide motion detection with adjustable sensitivity and configurable motion zones also.

6. Video Processing

Winner: Amcrest

Amcrest’s the winner here as its cameras generally have higher frame rates, True WDR along with BLC, HLC, and digital noise reduction.

Firstly, frame rate is important as it determines the smoothness of the video. Amcrest cameras typically support higher frame rates, with most models being able to handle 30 frames per second (fps), which ensures smoother video playback. On the other hand, Reolink cameras generally come with a lower frame rate of 15fps. A higher frame rate might be preferred for higher-security areas where capturing fast movements is crucial.

24/7 Recording

When it comes to continuous recording, Amcrest has a clear advantage as several of its models support this feature, while most Reolink cameras do not. This very much relates to how the camera is powered. As Amcrest offers mostly PoE and Coax cameras, they generally have 24/7 recording; while Reolink’s catalog is weighted towards wireless cameras.

Continuous recording can be useful for monitoring critical areas where you don't want to miss any activity. On the flip side, Reolink cameras seem to focus more on motion-activated recording, which can save on storage space as well as power consumption. Motion-activated recording can be a better choice for low-risk areas or when you only need to record events when motion is detected.

Coding Formats

Another important factor to consider is the video coding format. Amcrest cameras offer a wider range of supported formats, including H.265, H.264, and MJPEG, whereas most Reolink cameras work with either H.264 or H.265 only. The H.265 format is more advanced and efficient compared to H.264, providing greater compression without compromising video quality. This means that H.265 allows you to save more video footage while using less storage space.

True WDR

As for the Wide Dynamic Range (WDR), a feature that helps balance lighting in high-contrast scenes, many Amcrest cameras offer True WDR, with some providing up to 120-140dB of WDR. 

On the other hand, Reolink models are more limited in this regard, featuring Digital WDR / HDR. This means that Amcrest cameras generally have better performance in challenging lighting conditions.

Image Adjustments

Amcrest cameras also provide more video advanced features, such as Backlight Compensation (BLC), Highlight Compensation (HLC), and 2D/3D Digital Noise Reduction (DNR), which help improve video quality and clarity. Reolink cameras, conversely, typically have fewer advanced features, although some models come with 3D DNR or support privacy masking.

7. Camera Body

Winner: Amcrest

The Amcrest cameras tend to be heavier (Based on the 52 cameras reviewed, the average weight of Amcrest cameras was double Reolinks!) which usually correlates to being sturdier. And they can operate at lower temperatures. 

Amcrest offers a wider variety of materials used in their camera construction, such as plastic, aluminum, and heavy-duty metal cases. This means that they have options for different levels of durability and vandal resistance, depending on the model. Reolink cameras are typically made with metal aluminum, which still offers good durability.

Weather Rating & Temperature

In terms of weather resistance, both brands offer options ranging from IP65 to IP67 ratings, with Amcrest having a slightly higher number of IP67-rated models. This means that, overall, these cameras should be able to withstand harsh weather conditions, such as heavy rain and dust, making them suitable for outdoor use.

When it comes to operating temperature ranges, Amcrest cameras generally have a wider range compared to Reolink models, with some Amcrest options able to function at temperatures as low as -40°F and as high as 158°F. Reolink cameras typically have a temperature range of 14°F to 131°F. This might be an essential factor if you live in an area with extreme temperatures.

Size & Weight

Regarding camera dimensions, Amcrest offers a broader range of sizes, from compact cameras to larger models. Reolink cameras are generally more consistent in size, mostly sticking to a medium-sized form factor. This means that, depending on your preferences and installation area, you may find the appropriate camera size from either brand.

Regarding the camera's weight, Amcrest cameras generally weigh more than Reolink models. Heavier cameras can often be an indicator of sturdier construction and higher durability. However, lighter cameras, like those offered by Reolink, can be more manageable when installing or moving locations.

Vandal Resistance

It's important to note that some specific features, such as vandal-resistance, are available in a few models of Amcrest cameras (like the IP2M-866W). Reolink also offers some models, such as the RLC-542WA, with IK10 vandal-proof ratings. Make sure to check individual models for these features according to your security needs.

8. Night Vision

Winner: Amcrest

This was a close call as Reolink tends to perform better in Infrared, however, Amcrest cameras work better in low lighting conditions, with a larger image sensor and True WDR.

Night vision is a crucial component of security cameras, and in my research, it’s clear that both brands offer an Infrared (IR) night vision capability. 

However, there are differences in night vision functionality across various models. Some Amcrest cameras provide infrared and full-color night vision via a low-light sensor, while Reolink cameras often achieve this through spotlight technology. 

Infrared LEDs

Reolink cameras tend to have more integrated Infrared LEDs which results in those cameras having a slightly longer infrared range in total darkness.

For those looking for cameras with spotlight functionality, both brands offer some models with spotlights/floodlights included. The Amcrest floodlight (ASH26-W) is the brightest of all cameras reviewed, with 2000 lumens of light.

Minimum illumination for color is another factor to consider, as it represents the lowest amount of light needed for the camera to produce a color image. Lower values indicate that the camera can produce a color image in very low light conditions. Amcrest models have lower minimum illumination values, such as 0.005 and 0.009. This generally corresponds to the camera having a larger image sensor to let light in.

9. PTZ Functionality

Winner: Reolink

If you're looking for a security camera with very advanced PTZ features and much higher optical zoom capabilities, Amcrest has a couple of models worth looking at. For everything else, Reolink has an impressive range of options, in a variety of power and data formats (wired, wireless, wire-free, 4G). They also have multi-sensor PTZ cameras, for wide-angle and telescopic auto-tracking (TrackMix Series).

PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom) capabilities allow a camera to pan (move horizontally), tilt (move vertically), and zoom (enlarge view) to cover a larger area. 

Digital zoom is a software-based zoom that enlarges the image, but the resolution will decrease as the image is enlarged. 

Optical zoom, on the other hand, uses a lens to provide a higher-quality, clearer image when zooming in.

Amcrest

Amcrest offers a wide range of security cameras with both digital and optical zoom features. Specifically, most Amcrest cameras provide digital zoom with up to 16x magnification, whereas the optical zoom feature varies between 3x to 32x, depending on the model. 

In addition, Amcrest also offers multiple models with pan and tilt features, some even come with PTZ presets, tours, scans, and patterns.

Examples include the Amcrest IP2M-863EW-AI and IP4M-1063EW-AI which offer pan, tilt, and up to 25x-32x optical zoom, for tracking and monitoring larger areas more effectively.

Reolink

Reolink, on the other hand, tends to focus on digital zoom, with many models having 6x to 16x magnification. While fewer Reolink cameras offer optical zoom, the ones that do, provide a range of 3x to 16x magnification. 

Pan and tilt features are available on a number of Reolink models, which tend to be more consumer-grade than Amcrests.

Research & Citations

Hands-On Product Testing

• https://smarthomeperfected.com/reolink-argus-pt-2k-security-camera-review/
• https://smarthomeperfected.com/reolink-argus-pro-security-camera-review/

Camera Models included in Research

Sources

https://reolink.com/

https://amcrest.com/

The post Amcrest vs Reolink: Security Camera Head to Head! appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

In this analysis, I examined a total of 52 security cameras, including 29 from Amcrest and 23 from Lorex, to provide you with essential information on their camera lineup. A comprehensive list of product codes can be found at the end of the article.

The Winners

Best for Customized Security

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Comprehensive Kits

View Cameras & Kits

Best for Customized Security: Amcrest

I've picked Amcrest as “Best for Customized Security” as it offers people the flexibility and compatibility they need to create a tailored surveillance system.

With ONVIF compatibility, Amcrest cameras can easily integrate with other platforms, such as Blue Iris, without being confined to a specific package.

Amcrest cameras also tend to have better low-light visibility for enhanced night vision compared to Lorex. Despite their cameras having a similar price to Lorex, Amcrest cameras also feature True WDR (Wide Dynamic Range) technology, which provides a higher quality image than the HDR or Digital WDR found in Lorex cameras.

Additionally, Amcrest cameras come with alarm interfaces, a feature that is less common in Lorex products.

Best for Comprehensive Kits: Lorex

I've picked Lorex as “Best for Comprehensive Kits” as it's more of a one-stop shop than Amcrest. They have better mobile apps, making it simple to monitor and manage your security system from anywhere.

With a Lorex package or kit, you receive all the necessary components for a complete surveillance system, without the need to piece together individual elements.

Some Lorex cameras have Active Deterrence Technology, a feature that Amcrest lacks, which helps to prevent potential security breaches before they occur. With support for Google Assistant and Chromecast, Lorex offers seamless integration with popular smart home platforms, further differentiating it from Amcrest.

Financing options are also available for customers.

Amcrest vs Lorex: Overview

Founded in 2013, Amcrest offers a diverse range of security camera products, including NVR, DVR, PoE Cameras, Wi-Fi Cameras, Wire-Free Cameras, PTZ Cameras, and various camera packages. 

Most Amcrest cameras utilize a wired data and power connection, but there are some wireless options available as well. For cloud subscriptions, Amcrest has optional plans for most of their models, allowing you the flexibility to choose based on your requirements. 

All Amcrest cameras come with a standard 1-year warranty.

Lorex

In contrast, Lorex, founded in 1991, primarily focuses on business users and provides a similar product range.

Similar to Amcrest, most Lorex cameras have wired data and power connections with a few wireless options. Notably, Lorex cameras do not have optional cloud subscription plans, so you'll need to rely on local storage for your footage. 

The standard warranty for Lorex cameras is 1 year, similar to Amcrest.

Dahua OEM

Both brands manufacture their equipment through Dahua, while Amcrest’s key benefits lies in its ONVIF compatibility, allowing for integration with third-party devices and systems. 

Lorex distinguishes itself with its 30-year history, financing options, and a well-regarded reputation among DIYers and installers.

Mobile App

When it comes to the mobile app experience, Amcrest's average app review score is 2.25/5, while Lorex scores slightly better with a 3.6/5. Also, Amcrest offers a cloud platform called the “Amcrest Smart Home Cloud,” which provides additional features such as cloud storage and AI notifications, whereas Lorex does not have a similar offering.

One downside of Amcrest is the multiple mobile apps with a not-so-stellar quality compared to the competition. Lorex, on the other hand, suffers from low interoperability, as they don't officially advertise support for third-party systems, even though some of their products do have ONVIF and RTSP support.

Budget

Price-wise, Amcrest has options for various budgets, starting as low as $34.99 up to $919.99. In comparison, Lorex's prices range from $39.99 to $1,199.99. 

Power & Data

For power options, both brands offer cameras that can be powered by PoE (Power over Ethernet), DC power, and AC power. Some Lorex cameras, such as the U471AA-E model, can also be powered by batteries and solar panels, which can make them more versatile and eco-friendly.

When it comes to data transmission, Amcrest cameras primarily use PoE and 2.4GHz WiFi. Some Amcrest models also support 5GHz WiFi and coaxial cables for data transmission. On the other hand, Lorex cameras offer more variety in their data transmission options, integrating PoE, 2.4GHz WiFi, 5GHz WiFi, and coaxial cables across their different models.

In terms of data transmission range, Amcrest analog cameras, like the AMC4KBC28-W, can transmit data over long distances (up to 2,296 ft) through coaxial cables. Lorex cameras also offer long-range transmission such as in the E892ABW model, which has a 300 ft PoE transmission range.

IP and Analog

Another difference to consider is the type of data each camera handles. Both Amcrest and Lorex offer IP cameras, which transmit digital video data over the internet or computer networks. In addition to IP cameras, Amcrest also provides analog cameras supporting HD-CVI, HD-CVBS, HD-TVI, and HD-AHD formats, while Lorex has analog cameras compatible with HD-AHD, HD-TVI, HD-CVI, and HD-CVBS formats as well. 

This means that both brands cater to a range of consumer needs, offering both modern IP cameras and analog cameras for those with existing coaxial cable infrastructure.

Video Quality

When it comes to video quality, many Amcrest models support continuous recording with max supported frame rates of around 30 frames per second (FPS). On the other hand, Lorex cameras offer a mix of continuous and motion-activated recording, with some models offering frame rates of 15 to 30 FPS.

Amcrest cameras utilize video coding formats such as H.265 and H.264, while Lorex uses a mix of H.265, H.264, and NTSC/PAL formats. H.265 is a newer and more efficient format than H.264, allowing for better video quality and reduced file sizes. NTSC/PAL formats are mainly used for analog cameras.

WDR

Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) is a feature that helps balance exposure in scenes with contrasting lighting conditions. Amcrest offers models with both true and digital WDR, ranging from 120 to 140 dB (IP4M-1046EW-AI). Lorex models typically have digital WDR.

Noise reduction is essential for producing clear, sharp images in various lighting conditions. Most Amcrest models feature 2D and 3D Digital Noise Reduction (DNR), while Lorex models primarily offer 3D DNR (such as the LNE9383). Both companies also provide advanced video features such as Back Light Compensation (BLC), High Light Compensation (HLC), white balance control, and gain control.

Multiple Video Streams

Amcrest and Lorex cameras can support multiple video streams, with Amcrest cameras supporting up to three streams. Offering multiple video streams allows for different users to access the camera simultaneously with separate settings.

Lastly, privacy masking is essential in safeguarding personal privacy. Amcrest models often include privacy masking as a standard feature, while it's available in select Lorex models as well.

Audio & Alarms

Starting with audio features, my research shows that the majority of both Amcrest and Lorex security cameras offer integrated microphones (like the AMC4KBC28-W and E893DD-E). This means that these cameras can deliver clear audio alongside video, providing a more detailed understanding of events taking place in your property. 

Integrated microphones are especially useful in scenarios where communication between people captured on video might be important for security purposes.

Alarms

Moving on to alarm systems, the presence of external alarm interfaces seems to be more common in Amcrest cameras compared to Lorex models. Having an alarm interface allows your camera to connect with other security devices, creating a centralized security system that can streamline monitoring and control efforts.

Some Amcrest cameras are equipped with sirens, while many Lorex models have built-in sirens as well. Integrated sirens can provide an additional layer of security by attracting attention and potentially scaring off burglars. It's important to note that the siren loudness varies across different models, with some of the Amcrest cameras reaching up to 110 decibels.

Two Way Audio

Another noteworthy feature to consider when comparing these two brands is two-way audio. This capability allows you to listen and talk through the camera, enhancing communication with people on your property or even potentially warding off intruders. Many Amcrest and Lorex models offer this feature.

Camera Storage

Amcrest cameras tend to have onboard storage capacities ranging from 128GB to 512GB, with most models supporting 256GB microSD cards for local storage. In addition to microSD, Amcrest cameras are compatible with storage options like Network Video Recorders (NVR), Network Attached Storage (NAS), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), and Cloud. 

Notably, some Amcrest models require a Digital Video Recorder (DVR) for storage, such as the AMC4KBC28-W and AMC4KDM28-B.

Regarding interoperability, many Amcrest cameras support popular protocols and third-party applications like Blue Iris, ONVIF, RTSP, and CGI. These systems allow for seamless integration with existing security infrastructures, making Amcrest cameras a versatile choice for users looking to expand or improve their home security.

On the other hand, Lorex cameras offer onboard storage capacities of 256GB, available with models like the W881AAD-E, W452ASDB-E, and F461AQD-E. Lorex storage options include microSD cards, NVR, DVR, NAS, FTP, and Wireless Hubs, with certain devices limited to specific storage means. For instance, the LNE9383 camera works with NAS and FTP, while the B451AJD-E camera is compatible with microSD and NVR.

Although Lorex cameras officially support fewer interoperability options than Amcrest, select models are compatible with ONVIF, RTSP, and CGI, as seen with the LNZ44P4BW, LNZ44P12B, and LNE9383. These industry-standard protocols ensure that Lorex cameras can integrate with many security systems and provide dependable surveillance solutions.

Camera Lens Specs

Amcrest offers a wide variety of models catering to different requirements. They have cameras with focal lengths ranging from 1.4mm to 4mm, providing comprehensive coverage of the area under surveillance. 

Many Amcrest models come with a fixed focus lens, which allows for a constant focus and sharp image quality. Some models also offer a motorized lens for zooming capabilities. Amcrest cameras have a resolution spectrum from 2MP to 12MP (like the IP12M-F2380EW), giving you the option to choose the right resolution for your specific needs.

Field of View

When it comes to the field of view, Amcrest is not short on options either. Their cameras have a field of view range between 90 degrees to 180 degrees horizontally. This means you can get a solution for monitoring a narrow alley or a large room without any issues. Moreover, their image sensors range from sizes 1/3″ to 1/1.7″, which means that you can expect good quality images, especially in low light conditions.

Lorex, on the other hand, also offers a diverse selection of security camera models. With focal lengths ranging from 2.6mm to 5.3mm and both fixed focus and motorized lens options, Lorex cameras excel in covering various surveillance needs. Their camera resolutions are also competitive, offering models with resolutions from 2MP to 8MP (like the LNE9383).

Lorex cameras feature a horizontal field of view starting from around 54 degrees up to 164 degrees, providing a range of coverage suitable for various surveillance scenarios. Their image sensor sizes are predominantly 1/2.8″ or 1/3″, ensuring image clarity in different lighting environments.

Night Vision

Amcrest offers a wide selection of camera models with various night vision functionalities, the majority of which utilize Infrared and Full-Color technology via a low light sensor. Some models, such as the IP8M-TB2886EW-AI, IP8M-2496EW-V2, and A5TN28-W, also feature a spotlight to improve visibility in dark situations. The infrared distance for Amcrest cameras typically ranges between 32 feet and 328 feet, providing expansive coverage during nighttime hours.

Lorex cameras also come equipped with diverse night vision capabilities, including Infrared, Full Color technology via a low light sensor, and Full Color via a spotlight. Models like the W881AAD-E, W452ASDB-E, V261LCD-E, and U471AA-E even boast Active Deterrence Technology, which enhances security by discouraging intruders from attempting any breach. Lorex cameras have infrared coverage that spans from 27 feet up to 300 feet, depending on the model.

Minimum Illumination for Color

Minimum illumination for color is an essential factor to consider, as a lower value suggests improved functionality in low light situations. Throughout the Amcrest range, the minimum illumination values range from 0.005 to 0.0840, while Lorex models vary between 0.005 and 0.02. In most circumstances, Amcrest offers superior low-light color visibility.

When it comes to the number of Infrared LEDs, both Amcrest and Lorex cameras offer varying options. Some models have as few as 1 LED, while others boast up to 12 LEDs. The presence of more Infrared LEDs generally results in better visibility during nighttime hours.

Camera Smarts

In terms of smart integrations, Lorex appears to offer more options, supporting Alexa, Google Assistant, Chromecast, Fire TV, and Apple TV for certain models. Amcrest supports Alexa for some models but does not currently offer Google Assistant or Chromecast support. This means that if you prefer a security camera system that easily integrates with your existing smart home ecosystem, Lorex may have an edge.

Motion Detection

Motion detection features are crucial for effective home security. Both Amcrest and Lorex offer configurable motion zones and motion sensitivity in many of their models, which allows users to focus the camera's attention on specific areas while reducing false alarms. Additionally, both brands provide motion alerts, with push notifications being the most common method.

When it comes to advanced detection features, Amcrest has a wide variety of options across its models, including person detection, vehicle detection, face detection, heat maps, and people counting (such as the IP12M-F2380EW). On the other hand, Lorex offers person detection, vehicle detection, animal detection, and object detection in some of its models (like the W881AAD-E).

Advanced Features

Perimeter protection features in security cameras add an extra layer of security to your property. Amcrest offers robust perimeter protection options (like in the IP8M-MD180E-AI), including tripwire detection and intrusion detection in many models, with additional features like crowd gathering detection and region entrance/exit detection available in select models. Lorex, however, appears to have fewer models with these advanced features.

Finally, both Amcrest and Lorex provide other event triggers in some of their models. Amcrest models may include triggers such as abandoned objects, missing objects, video tampering, and storage anomalies. Lorex offers similar triggers like abandoned objects, missing objects, and video tampering in some models (such as the E893AB-E).

Pan-Tilt-Zoom

In terms of PTZ (Pan-Tilt-Zoom) capabilities, Amcrest offers a wider range of cameras that support PTZ features compared to Lorex cameras. The PTZ capabilities allow the camera to pan, tilt, and zoom, enabling more precise monitoring of the surroundings. Most Amcrest PTZ cameras offer an extensive range of pan and tilt angles, often providing 360° pan and 90° tilt coverage.

Zoom

Zooming is a significant factor to consider when selecting a security camera. Both Amcrest and Lorex offer models with digital zoom and optical zoom capabilities. Digital zoom magnifies the image using software, while optical zoom uses a physical lens to magnify the image, providing better image quality. In my research, I found that Amcrest has more cameras with digital zoom, and many models also offer optical zoom (such as the IP2M-863EW-AI and the IP4M-1083EW-AI). Lorex cameras also have digital zoom capability, but only some models feature optical zoom (like the LZV2925SC).

When it comes to AI-based features like tracking and motion detection, both brands offer select models with these advanced capabilities. These features help ensure the security system is more efficient and effective by tracking and highlighting possible threats in real-time.

Build Quality

In terms of weather resistance, Amcrest offers a variety of models with high IP ratings, such as IP67 and IP66, ensuring that their cameras can withstand harsh weather conditions. Most Amcrest models are made from metal, heavy-duty metal, or aluminum, indicating that they are built to be durable and long-lasting. Amcrest also offers models designed specifically for indoor use, featuring plastic construction and weather-resistant ratings for indoor security options.

On the other hand, Lorex also offers models with high IP ratings (IP66 and IP67) for weather resistance, but you can find a few models with lower IP ratings such as IP65. Lorex's camera materials include metal, heavy-duty metal, aluminum alloy, and polycarbonate, providing strength and durability to their product lineup as well. 

Temperature Resistance

In terms of temperature resistance, Amcrest cameras generally have a wider operating temperature range, with most models capable of functioning within -40°F to 140°F (-40°C to 60°C). Lorex cameras offer similar temperature resistance, with some models even capable of functioning within -40°F to 158°F (-40°C to 70°C), ensuring that they can operate in extreme weather conditions.

As for camera weights, both Amcrest and Lorex offer lightweight and heavy-duty options. Amcrest camera weights range from 240g to 4,699g (which is the IP4M-1083EW-AI), while Lorex cameras range from 190g to 5,300g (LNZ81P25). Heavier cameras typically come with more advanced features and higher durability, while lighter cameras may be easier to install and may be more appropriate for indoor use. 

Lastly, the maximum operating humidity for Amcrest cameras is generally around 95%, while Lorex cameras have a slightly lower operating humidity, ranging from 90% to 98%. This indicates that both brands can handle high levels of humidity in the environment.

Camera Models Included in my Research

Sources

https://amcrest.com/

https://www.lorex.com/

The post Amcrest vs Lorex: In-Depth 2024 Comparison of Leading Security Camera Brands appeared first on Smart Home Perfected.

Bullet Camera

9.5

Swann Wired Bullet Camera

Winner4K video

View Price

9.4

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

CMOS Image Sensor

View Price

Turret Camera

9.4

Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera

WinnerIntrusion Detection

View Price

9.2

Swann Wired Turret Camera

Thermal Sensing

View Price

PTZ Camera

9.4

Hikvision Outdoor PTZ Camera

WinnerObject Counting technology

View Price

9.3

Swann CCTV PTZ Camera

Backlight Compensation

View Price

We score Hikvision vs Swann camera models based on resolution and field of view, power & installation options, night vision, motion detection & audio, as well as footage storage and streaming.

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Swann Wired Bullet Camera

Score: 9.5

View Price

Bullet Camera Head to Head

9.4

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

CMOS Image Sensor

Model(s): DS-2CD2043G0-I

The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera comes in 2 different colors: white and black. It also has a 1/3″ Progressive Scan CMOS image sensor and a 4mm fixed lens. It can capture 4MP (2688 ×1520) resolution videos at 30 fps.

Also, it’s available with 0° to 360° pan, 0° to 90° tilt, and 0° to 360° rotation.

View Price
On Amazon.com

9.5

Swann Wired Bullet Camera

4K video

vs

Model(s): SWNHD-885MSB

The Swann Wired Bullet Camera is an outdoor security camera that is completely waterproof. It comes with a 93 degree viewing angle to cover more area in front of it.

Moreover, it comes with a zoom feature. You can zoom in to see distant objects very clearly. This camera can see 250-200 feet in low-light.

View Price
On Amazon.com

Pros

• Water- and dust-resistant (IP67).
• Comes with full metal housing.

Cons

• Does not support a BNC connector.

Pros

• Sends push notifications.
• Works perfectly in -22°F ~ 131°F, -30°C ~ 55°C.

Cons

• Requires a Swann NVR.

Hikvision vs Swann: Resolution and Field of View

9.3

9.6

The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera can deliver 2688 × 1520px resolution recordings at 30 fps. Moreover, it also comes with a CMOS image sensor.

In contrast, the Swann Wired Bullet Camera can record 4K videos. It operates in -22°F ~ 131°F, -30°C ~ 55°C temperatures.

Power & Installation Options

9.7

9.6

The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera supports a PoE Ethernet connection.

The Swann Wired Bullet Camera requires a hard-wired connection to a compatible Swann NVR. It comes with a 60 feet CAT5 wire, but you can also buy a larger wire for it if needed.

Night Vision, Motion Detection & Audio

9.5

9.4

The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera supports face recognition and behavior analysis. Its night vision range can cover 100 feet.

Comparatively, with the Swann Wired Bullet Camera, you can view 150-200 feet in low light. Moreover, the device comes with True Detect technology to sense the heat and movement of objects for enhanced security.

Footage Storage and Streaming

9.5

9.4

With the Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera, you only get a local storage option. You can use 128GB microSD cards, or NAS, SMB/CIFS, and ANR storage. 

On the other hand, the Swann Wired Bullet Camera stores videos on a Swann NVR, which needs to be purchased separately. You only need one PoE cable for the setup process.

Technical Comparison

	Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera	Swann Wired Bullet Camera
Night Vision Range	100 Feet	150-200 Feet
Video Resolution	4 MP	4K
Alert type	Motion Detection	Motion & Heat Detection
Mounting Type	Wall Mount	Wall Mount
Viewing Angle	360 degrees	93 degree
Frame Rate	30 fps	N/A
Item Dimensions	6.3 x 2.76 x 2.76 inches	2.76 x 2.76 x 5.94 inches
IR LEDs	N/A	N/A

The Verdict

9.4

Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera

CMOS Image Sensor

Model(s): DS-2CD2043G0-I

The Hikvision 4MP Bullet Camera comes in 2 different colors: white and black. It also has a 1/3″ Progressive Scan CMOS image sensor and a 4mm fixed lens. It can capture 4MP (2688 ×1520) resolution videos at 30 fps.

Also, it’s available with 0° to 360° pan, 0° to 90° tilt, and 0° to 360° rotation.

View Price
On Amazon.com

9.5

Swann Wired Bullet Camera

4K video

vs

Model(s): SWNHD-885MSB

The Swann Wired Bullet Camera is an outdoor security camera that is completely waterproof. It comes with a 93 degree viewing angle to cover more area in front of it.

Moreover, it comes with a zoom feature. You can zoom in to see distant objects very clearly. This camera can see 250-200 feet in low-light.

View Price
On Amazon.com

Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera

Score: 9.4

View Price

Swann Wired Turret Camera

Score: 9.2

View Price

Turret Camera Head to Head

9.4

Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera

Intrusion Detection

The Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera records Full HD 1080p videos at 20 frames per second. It comes packed with advanced features including a 2.8mm/4mm/6mm fixed lens, 120dB wide dynamic range, 3D digital noise reduction, and backlit compensation technology.

It can detect motion, intrusion, and tampering. Setting it up is very simple, too. You only need to plug the CAT5 cable in and you're done.

View Price
On Amazon.com

9.2

Swann Wired Turret Camera

Thermal Sensing

vs

Model(s): SWNHD-886MSD

The Swann Wired Turret Camera is a reliable security option for both home and office use. It comes with True Detect technology that picks up heat and motion.

This camera also supports audio which is useful if deployed indoors to monitor children.

View Price
On Amazon.com

Pros

• Uses one PoE cable for power and data transfer.
• Uses H.264/MJPEG/H.264+ for video compression.

Cons

• Some users complained of the unit getting hot after continuous use.

Pros

• Comes with waterproof housing.
• 93-degree wide field of view.

Cons

• More expensive than similar models.

Resolution and Field of View

9.4

9.2

The Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera can capture 2560x1920p 4MP resolution videos at 20 fps. Meanwhile, the Swann Wired Turret Camera can record 4K Ultra HD videos. With this camera, you can also zoom in on objects and people, a feature that's missing from the Hikvision EXIR.

Power & Installation Options

9.4

9.3

Both models require only one PoE (Power over Ethernet) cable for power and data transfer. You just have to connect the Ethernet cable to the DIN port. AFterwards, once you connect the camera to the PoE injector using the other cable, you are all set.

The Swann Wired Turret Camera comes with a cable, stickers, mouse, and other necessary accessories.

Night Vision, Motion Detection & Audio

9.3

9.2

With both models, you can specify certain zones for motion detection, schedule detection intervals, and set their sensibility level.

The Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera covers only 100 feet at night. However, it supports face recognition, intrusion detection, device tampering, and network failure failsafe.

Footage Storage and Streaming

9.6

9.1

The Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera only supports NFS, SMB/CIFS storage. It comes with Dual H. 265/H. 246 compression for maximum encryption. This technology increases its video storage and bandwidth capacity.

On the opposite, the Swann Wired Turret Camera uses an NVR for storing videos.

Technical Comparison

	Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera	Swann Wired Turret Camera
Internal Storage	NFS Storage	128GB
Night Vision Range	100 Feet	200 Feet
Video Resolution	1080p	4K
Alert type	Motion Detection	Motion Detection
Viewing Angle	N/A	113 degrees
Frame Rate	20-30 fps	15 fps
Item Dimensions	6 x 6 x 5.5 inches	14 x 10 x 8 inches
Zoom	N/A	N/A

The Verdict

Both the Hikvision EXIR IP and the Swann Wired Turret Cameras have many similar features. But the Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera takes the winners spot as it has ultra-HD video resolution, night vision, great field of view, and versatile video storage.

9.4

Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera

Intrusion Detection

The Hikvision EXIR Turret Camera records Full HD 1080p videos at 20 frames per second. It comes packed with advanced features including a 2.8mm/4mm/6mm fixed lens, 120dB wide dynamic range, 3D digital noise reduction, and backlit compensation technology.

It can detect motion, intrusion, and tampering. Setting it up is very simple, too. You only need to plug the CAT5 cable in and you're done.

View Price
On Amazon.com

9.2

Swann Wired Turret Camera

Thermal Sensing

vs

Model(s): SWNHD-886MSD

The Swann Wired Turret Camera is a reliable security option for both home and office use. It comes with True Detect technology that picks up heat and motion.

This camera also supports audio which is useful if deployed indoors to monitor children.

View Price
On Amazon.com